AR camp transports, the evidence.

It seems you go with whatever, fits your preconceptions; there is no need to repeat the "narrative" time again but to provide new information.
The issue you have not proved is those transports arrived at a camp; it only seems you think they did without definitive proof.  It is logical in any administration who has a presence to name nearby locations the same as the institution.  For instance departures from London by air are referred simply as Heathrow (named after a small hamlet); no one assumes they are going to the location of the old town.

As Treblinka like the other AR camps were border camps of course they are a final destination; there are customs to deal with.  Not even the SS could bypass the revenue gatherers.  They were going into a different district which was controlled in a different manner than the GG.
To sort the paper work etc for border crossings would be timely; people also needed to be in different attire so a nearby camp would be needed.


   In the case of the AR camps, all near borders I suggest the border exit point is named after the nearest facility or town.  There was an existing camp there which did have something to do with the border.  Why murder people at the border?  This could have been done anywhere; if they wanted to fool them let them cross the Bug to give a false sense of security.  Instead of doing that these border camps a few km from the border were alleged to have done "the deed".  I do hope you realize how absurd this seems.
Helen Schwartz was never at Treblinka, only at Auschwitz and Belsen.  In her biography she never mentions Treblinka at all, it is only you who have said this.



This is nonsense and I think you well know.  Aktion 14f13, also called invalid or prisoner euthanasia, the campaign culled the sick, elderly and those deemed no longer fit for work; this involved about 20 thousand people at the most.  Not many would deny this Aktion was a fact; this is evidenced by the Sobibor Dutch survivors and highly unethical.  

What has happened is the conceptual slippery slope to mass exterminations.  From this absurdity claims were made as though they were fact, with little or no evidence to support them.  Euthanizing those not fit to work is hardly a holocaust nor is it genocide as the aim was not to get rid of a group; it was applied equally to all groups across the spectrum.  It is only the Jews who seem to think they were the ones worthy of such horrors. 

Pierre Berg at Auschwitz (non Jew) got sick and thought he was going to be euthanized; this was the rumors going around.  He did meet Dr Mengele who got extra nutritious rations for him; the same happened to Schlomo Pivnik a jew.  Both men got better.