AR camp transports, the evidence.

There are numerous documents recording transports to the AR camps. Examples include the Hofle telegram, Ganzenmuller Letter, the Warsaw Shuttle train record, the Monastir to Treblinka transport report, referring to Treblinka as the "final destination" and then there are the numerous ghetto transit records that have enabled historians to put together timelines of transports to the AR camps.

All of those records have survived. There is no record at all, of regular mass transports back out of the AR camps, or arrivals anywhere else. 

Off topic posts have been relocated to logic & absurdities.  Stick to the topic please gentlemen.

That is great. I often make posts, re read them and think, "what the hell is that about", then delete whole paragraphs; no one is perfect.
How do you know that the wagons did not back into the siding or spur (if PR is wrong), drop off a few hundred people, allow people to embark and move on to Siedlce with the new people and the rest who stayed in their carriages.

The evidence Turnagain supplied about 10 thousand or so relocating elsewhere got on transports somehow. We need more clarification on that point if he has it.

Not all evidence and eyewitness testimony is reliable.
As Sobibor had various functions: work classification, sorting valuables and euthanasia then it is likely that Treblinka had a similar theme. ( I don't care if the euthanized were gassed or shot, hanged or injected with strychnine). The assessment of witness credibility is important but outside the scope of this thread; that can be discussed elsewhere.

If there are transports across the Bug to wherever, they (the Nazis) would not want the elderly and infirm to head there; the best idea is to get them dealt with while the valuables were confiscated in the same place.

As the prisoners were just whisked off the street and onto transports for the most part they were given inmate clothing (striped pajamas or whatever); the best place is some camp near the border so that clothes do not need to be sent to the various judenlagers 100km away. Trains going to those places are for troops and ammo etc not inmate garb.

I am putting it to you Nessie that like Sobibor where euthanasia was mistaken for "extermination" and people moved on as the witnesses stated, Treblinka and perhaps Belzec all border camps at one time or another had a similar function.

It seems you go with whatever, fits your preconceptions; there is no need to repeat the "narrative" time again but to provide new information.
The issue you have not proved is those transports arrived at a camp; it only seems you think they did without definitive proof.  It is logical in any administration who has a presence to name nearby locations the same as the institution.  For instance departures from London by air are referred simply as Heathrow (named after a small hamlet); no one assumes they are going to the location of the old town.

As Treblinka like the other AR camps were border camps of course they are a final destination; there are customs to deal with.  Not even the SS could bypass the revenue gatherers.  They were going into a different district which was controlled in a different manner than the GG.
To sort the paper work etc for border crossings would be timely; people also needed to be in different attire so a nearby camp would be needed.


   In the case of the AR camps, all near borders I suggest the border exit point is named after the nearest facility or town.  There was an existing camp there which did have something to do with the border.  Why murder people at the border?  This could have been done anywhere; if they wanted to fool them let them cross the Bug to give a false sense of security.  Instead of doing that these border camps a few km from the border were alleged to have done "the deed".  I do hope you realize how absurd this seems.
Helen Schwartz was never at Treblinka, only at Auschwitz and Belsen.  In her biography she never mentions Treblinka at all, it is only you who have said this.



This is nonsense and I think you well know.  Aktion 14f13, also called invalid or prisoner euthanasia, the campaign culled the sick, elderly and those deemed no longer fit for work; this involved about 20 thousand people at the most.  Not many would deny this Aktion was a fact; this is evidenced by the Sobibor Dutch survivors and highly unethical.  

What has happened is the conceptual slippery slope to mass exterminations.  From this absurdity claims were made as though they were fact, with little or no evidence to support them.  Euthanizing those not fit to work is hardly a holocaust nor is it genocide as the aim was not to get rid of a group; it was applied equally to all groups across the spectrum.  It is only the Jews who seem to think they were the ones worthy of such horrors. 

Pierre Berg at Auschwitz (non Jew) got sick and thought he was going to be euthanized; this was the rumors going around.  He did meet Dr Mengele who got extra nutritious rations for him; the same happened to Schlomo Pivnik a jew.  Both men got better.