Post by been_there on Apr 19, 2022 8:45:38 GMT
Anybody reading RODOH and seeing the repeated refusal by one person to admit numerous simple facts of science or reason if they contradict the holocaust narrative, will understand that the issue is psychological not historical.
There is a term for this type of delusional psychology.
Here is an excerpt from an article on it:
The great irony is that trying to look objectively, fairly, honestly and accurately at the narrative concerning the Jewish experience during WW2 has since the 1980s has been misrepresented and demonised as a form of denial.
Whereas the obvious reality is that such an approach is actually the complete opposite of denial.
Of course it is undoubtedly true that there can have been and likely still are people who look at that particular history unobjectively, unfairly, dishonestly and innaccurately. But the irrefutable fact remains that ALL critical inspection and publishing of this particular narrative has been â and inceasingly still is â tarred with the same brush.
This is the regretable situation we are now in with the current state of outlawing ANY objective approach to this particular history as heresy!
And the misuse of the term denial to silence scientific evaluation, critical analysis or just doubt and healthy skepticism is indicative of another mental disorder: that known as psychological projection.
From the proven plagiarist and fraud using the name Elie Wiesel, to Professor of Religion Deborah Lipstadt, to fraudster and debunked âholocaustâ author Herman Rosenblat, the common factor appears to me to be forms of denial of reality.
The irony is in my opinion collossal!
There is a term for this type of delusional psychology.
Here is an excerpt from an article on it:
Denial is a defence mechanism in which an individual refuses to recognise or acknowledge objective facts or experiences. Itâs often an unconscious process that serves to protect the person from discomfort or anxiety.
The concept [of denial] arose from the work of Sigmund Freud, whose daughter, Anna Freud, developed the idea of defence mechanisms, unconscious strategies whereby people protect themselves from anxious thoughts or feelings.
Anna believed that denial unconsciously protected the ego from discomfort and distress by rejecting aspects of reality itself. Denial was primarily used in childhood and adolescence, she believed, and could be damaging when employed regularly in adulthood.
Although many of Freud's ideas have been disproven, psychologists today still believe that defence mechanisms like denial are a valid concept.
Denial can encompass truths too difficult for an individual to confront or to accept.
In many instances, denial leads to short-term satisfaction but long-term pain. In the end, confronting reality â even when itâs difficult â is the best path forward.
www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/denial
The concept [of denial] arose from the work of Sigmund Freud, whose daughter, Anna Freud, developed the idea of defence mechanisms, unconscious strategies whereby people protect themselves from anxious thoughts or feelings.
Anna believed that denial unconsciously protected the ego from discomfort and distress by rejecting aspects of reality itself. Denial was primarily used in childhood and adolescence, she believed, and could be damaging when employed regularly in adulthood.
Although many of Freud's ideas have been disproven, psychologists today still believe that defence mechanisms like denial are a valid concept.
Denial can encompass truths too difficult for an individual to confront or to accept.
In many instances, denial leads to short-term satisfaction but long-term pain. In the end, confronting reality â even when itâs difficult â is the best path forward.
www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/denial
Whereas the obvious reality is that such an approach is actually the complete opposite of denial.
Of course it is undoubtedly true that there can have been and likely still are people who look at that particular history unobjectively, unfairly, dishonestly and innaccurately. But the irrefutable fact remains that ALL critical inspection and publishing of this particular narrative has been â and inceasingly still is â tarred with the same brush.
This is the regretable situation we are now in with the current state of outlawing ANY objective approach to this particular history as heresy!
And the misuse of the term denial to silence scientific evaluation, critical analysis or just doubt and healthy skepticism is indicative of another mental disorder: that known as psychological projection.
From the proven plagiarist and fraud using the name Elie Wiesel, to Professor of Religion Deborah Lipstadt, to fraudster and debunked âholocaustâ author Herman Rosenblat, the common factor appears to me to be forms of denial of reality.
The irony is in my opinion collossal!