PSYCHOLOGY: holocaust, mythology and the subconscious

Regarding belief in ‘the holocaust’, similar approaches to Tertullian’s and Fideism are commonplace, and possibly obligatory. Because, as anyone who honestly and intelligently explores the holocaust narrative critically will soon learn, aspects of its core premises defy reason, probability and often physical possibility.

Also, anyone who has attempted to discuss those particular non-credible aspects of the holocaust narrative with a diehard, Holocaust enthusiast will soon learn, reason, logic, empirical science and physical possibility are no match for a holocaust true-believer’s willingness to believe absurdities in order to avoid reality and to maintain their belief.

This is why I argue that ‘the holocaust’ has become more of a secular religion than a genuine historiography, and for the majority of people they have a cult-like belief that to be corrected requires cult exit-counselling and therapy, not facts and information. The reason being that facts and logic are ironically ignored and denied if they undermine the cultish ‘exterminatory mass-gassing’ belief-system.

Example 1
An example of the above is the reaction to the Doctoral thesis of Henri Roques.

Roques demonstrated the internal inconsistencies and discrepancies between the six texts of what is claimed to be the ‘confession of Kurt Gerstein’. 
In response the L.I.C.R.A. (Ligue Internationale Contre le Racisme et l'Anti-Sémitisme) and other Jewish groups pressured the French government into illegally cancelling Roques' degree!

In addition Leon Poliakov and Pierre Vidal-Naquet collected the signatures of thirty-two other historians to put their names to a letter printed in a prominent French newspaper which included this religiously-faithful but illogical support of particular holocaust-narrative absurdities:

It was possible technically because it took place. 

Such is the obligatory point of departure for all historical inquiry on the subject.”

On the 21st of February 1979, the newspaper Le Monde published the above illogical nonsense in a text entitled "The Hitler policy of Extermination: a declaration by historians."

Their letter also included an early example of the appeal to the ‘argument from ignorance’ logical fallacy. A fallacy that in this instance can be shortened to: ‘if they didn’t get gassed where did they go?’

Here is what they wrote:
“Since the end of the Second World War, it has happened on several occasions that publicists, sometimes taking the title of historians, have cast doubt on the veracity of the evidence of the Hitler policy of extermination. This evidence had, in 1945, a glaring obviousness. The great majority of the deportees today are dead.”

I won’t bore regular readers with the refutation of this illogical, defensive posture. There are links here at RODOH devoted to this for anyone interested. What I want to do instead is show how a true-believer mind-set fails to see the irony when these illogical defence mechanisms for avoiding the flaws in the holocaust narrative are presented back to them. 

SUMMARY: If anyone critically studies the compulsory holocaust creed and does not detect inconsistencies, contradictions, flaws and fundamental improbabilities regarding its two core premises of i.) Nazi policy of extermination of ALL Jews and ii.) mass-murder of approximately 4 million Jews in homicidal gas chambers, then this implies that they have regrettably not been capable of studying the topic either honestly or logically.

As the following discussions demonstrate:
.. .. .. ..

Example 2
.. .. .. .. ..

Example 3