|
Post by been_there on May 25, 2022 15:42:59 GMT
Further evidence of the hypocrisy and double standard that the cultish compulsion to conform, regarding this Hollow-hoax mass-gassing mythology has created, is the following. Compare the hateful and hypocrotical reaction NOW to the clearly honest and genuine answers Diana Mosley gave (quoted below), to the reaction to Fisher’s documentary about the 6 million mythology (quoted above).
|
|
|
Post by been_there on May 25, 2022 17:03:42 GMT
Here is link to the interview with Lady Mosley, for anyone interested.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Jun 26, 2022 19:03:36 GMT
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Aug 14, 2022 12:26:21 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Turnagain on Aug 17, 2022 5:57:14 GMT
Anecdotal only. I remember reading that in US executions such precautions as ruffling the hair of the condemned after gassing was required to release any cyanide that was trapped in the hair. Also that the gas chamber was kept under a slight negative pressure to ensure no leakage of the gas.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Sept 11, 2022 8:43:45 GMT
If it takes about one hundred years after an event for historians and other related branches of academia to be able to discuss it, contextualise it, demystify it and write about it objectively and without subconscious bias, then WW2 and the rather ludicrous holocaust mass-gassing meme will soon be up for re-assessment.
It has of course already been occurring since the 1950s with history Professor AJPTaylor’s deeply unwelcome controversial scholarly assessment and debunking of WW2 mythologies, (The origins of the Second World War)
and with Rassanier’s writings debunking of the preposterous Jewish mass-gassing mythology.
That debunking has continued very cautiously, tentatively and mildly with Prof. Nolte’s, Prof Hayward’s, Prof Norman Finkelstein’s and other scholarly writings.
We can add Professor Bloxham to that growing list of qualified academics who are questioning and dismantling the pseudo-religious edifice world-Jewry is increasingly desperately trying to shore up and maintain.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Oct 2, 2022 8:21:30 GMT
If it takes about one hundred years after an event for historians and other related branches of academia to be able to discuss it, contextualise it, demystify it and write about it objectively and without subconscious bias, then WW2 and the rather ludicrous holocaust mass-gassing meme will soon be up for re-assessment. It has of course already been occurring since the 1950s with history Professor AJPTaylor’s deeply unwelcome controversial scholarly assessment and debunking of WW2 mythologies, ( The origins of the Second World War) and with Rassanier’s writings debunking of the preposterous Jewish mass-gassing mythology. That debunking has continued very cautiously, tentatively and mildly with Prof. Nolte’s, Prof Hayward’s, Prof Norman Finkelstein’s and other scholarly writings. We can add Professor Bloxham to that growing list of qualified academics who are questioning and dismantling the pseudo-religious edifice world-Jewry is increasingly desperately trying to shore up and maintain. Here below is reference to another book by an academic who verrrrrrry tentatively attempted a mild reconstructing of the ‘holocaust’ pseudo-historical edifice, while simultaneously trying to blur and conceal the blatant discrepancies and biases it is based upon. The following is a recent review of it by another academic trying to do the same: This is just the beginning of the review and already the reviewer is admitting two things: 1.) that the origins of the mythology claiming a ‘special’ suffering by Jews during the mass-carnage and mass-murder that was conducted by all sides during WW2, plus the claim of there having been an attempted ‘genocide’ of ALL Jews by the Third Reich, was created by Jews. 2.) that this mythology “changed” in 1961 due to the world televised farce of a fair trial of Adolf Eichmann by the quasi-legal, colonial-settler, racist, Jewish state called Israel. Here above the reviewer admits that in chapter 3 another aspect of the jewish bias to this pseudo-historical narrative has been omitted. But presumably because of the conscious or subliminal fear of the weaponised accusation of ‘anti-semitism’, he doesn’t acknowledge that this Jewish bias pervades the whole mythology. Here the Professor inadvertently reveals the raison d’etre of the whole ‘holocaust’ historiography: viz. to emphasis the unique specialness of Jooish suffering amidst the world-wide suffering during WW2. He continues... The reviewer didn’t like this redefining/analysing by another qualified academic of the Jewish bias that pervades the H-mythology. Notice how in the first seven chapters of this book supposedly explaining for newcomers to the topic the areas of ‘debate’, absolutely no space or even reference has been given to the body of research that is erroneously demonised and censored as being ‘Holocaust denial’!! Not a word about that debate of what is vaguely defined as ‘THE Holocaust’ . Not a single reference or even acknowledgement about all that research and genuine debate. This fact alone demonstrates the deep dishonesty and ironic ‘denial’ of this officially sanctioned and protected pseudo-history. Get ready for the discussion of the last chapter: lie-witness (eye-witness) testimony: There we have it: this is ‘holocaust denial’ lite. 🙂 The reviewer responds with this: Yes, Professor, we understand. 😎
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Oct 13, 2022 15:21:44 GMT
Here is further proof that more people are not only questioning the sacrosanct and protected holyhoax mass-gassing mythology, but that they are daring to voice that disbelief in public and online and in print.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Oct 16, 2022 12:45:59 GMT
For all those die-hard, holyhoax true-believers who are in denial about the gradual and increasing drift towards skepticism, disbelief and refutation of holyhoax racist exaggerations and lies, here is an article by a Jewish historian conceding that this IS the current “trend”.
The historian was writing about how Poland is also starting to react to the carte blanche that Jews have been given for decades to accuse, slander and cast aspersions upon whoever they like with nothing to support their accusations/calumny other than anecdotal lie-witness/eye-witness (?) testimony.
This Jewish Polish-American academic was whingeing and whining about it this January in the Jew York Times. He had been ordered by a Polish court to apologise to the relatives of a “a long-deceased Polish village mayor” for unevidenced, disparaging assertions about the Mayor, made in a book the Jewish academic had co-edited. He regarded it as “a dangerous trend”.
|
|
𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐭𝐭
🦅
𝐈𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐞𝐭 𝐑𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐮𝐬
Posts: 209
|
Post by 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐭𝐭 on Oct 16, 2022 18:18:31 GMT
Anecdotal only. I remember reading that in US executions such precautions as ruffling the hair of the condemned after gassing was required to release any cyanide that was trapped in the hair. Also that the gas chamber was kept under a slight negative pressure to ensure no leakage of the gas. I just saw this post. In addition to what Turnagain already said, I have been through a lot of Medical Examiner literature where cyanide poisoning has been suspected. HCN can certainly be absorbed through the skin and be dangerous in that respect, but not nearly as effectively as through simple inhalation. Medical personnel are usually not too concerned about cyanide poisoning unless the decedent has actually ingested the cyanide in its salt form. When this happens it is usually far in excess of lethal amounts, and an ongoing chemical reaction with stomach acid can be very dangerous for medical personnel handling the body, especially breathing in confined spaces. Sorry, I don't remember the citations in the literature. Although Faurisson's claim that gassed bodies would pose a hazard is not wrong, it is also greatly overstated. Leuchter was not technically competent, let alone an Engineer as he claimed, and Chemist Germar Rudolf even recently admitted that he was either ignorant or incompetent ─ some candor that Revisionist Engineer Fritz Berg would have appreciated to hear while he was still alive. Designing or maintaining execution equipment is a very different problem than fumigation ─ let alone killing people ─ as a survey of the technical fumigation literature clearly shows. Leuchter was an expert in American execution hardware, but NOT fumigation ─ and he was not a competent engineer by a long shot. An execution is predicated around a certain amount of "performance theater," and some of the performative aspects of an execution involve keeping the legal witnesses perfectly safe and feeling comfortable. So Faurisson was being ill-advised about how "impossible" any homicidal gassings would have been. That being said, Leuchter was not wrong that after an execution with HCN such as in Arizona, which recently refurbished its execution gas chamber, bodies after the execution are often sprayed with a light ammonia cleaner, and the clothing and hair of the corpse is ruffled to let any residual HCN gas escape before being removed from the execution chamber, which also has a negative pressure to keep witnesses and execution technicians safe. I agree with the John Wear article. One can only marvel at the motivations of the "self-help gurus" who can confidently spread the most fabulistic lies about the Germans and Nazis to peddle their crass motivational messages. If we go back to the original Stanislavsky Lech story, he claims to have escaped from the Nazis by hiding naked in a pile of bodies that were gassed and then hauled off somewhere by truck. I am not aware of the standard Holocaust narrative stating that bodies were removed from the Nazi homicidal gaschambers and then carted off somewhere by truck. But the fairy tale is absurd on its face. I don't see how our Semitic hero could have hid naked underneath a pile of already gassed bodies to the point of almost being crushed and not suffer any ill-effects from either breathing or absorbing HCN from the skin. And then the dead bodies were handled, and somehow he was loaded into a truck and carted off somewhere alive ─ and this was not noticed by the bad guys, and our hero then went running in the buff through the forest to escape the Nazis? These are the types of fables that Jews apparently tell to their children. 
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Dec 8, 2022 14:58:27 GMT
Here is more evidence that increasing numbers of people are realising the nonsensical nature of the core ingredients of the narrative forced-fed to us with the title ‘the holocaust’.
The ludicrous ‘holocaust’ core premises being:
1. that the NSDAP attempted to kill every single person of Jewish or half-Jewish ethnicity that they had within their control. An obviously nonsensically FALSE claim. The wonder is that any brainwashed fools gullibly believe it.
2. that this attempted genocide of ALL Jews was partially achieved by murdering 6 million Jews, most of them in planned and designed (but impractically ad hoc) homicidal gas chambers.
Any intelligent, honest person who looks into either of these claims will notice it is a nonsense.
But most people have been intimidated by years of conditioning into thinking only evil people would look into it and would analyse intelligently the absurd claims.
This conditioning of portraying historiography as being about ‘evil’ skeptics (falsely demonised as racist deniers) versus ‘good’ believers, demonstrates it is a quasi religious indoctrination.
As proof of the religious nature of this pseudo-history, here is a recent article ridiculing an American Jew who has been ‘preaching’ that anyone who questions the accuracy of the holocaust mass-gassing mythology will be going to Hell after death. Hallelujah!!! 🙄 🤪🤪🤪
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Dec 8, 2022 15:06:22 GMT
The ‘holocaust’s core premises are two obviously false claims. Ridiculously false!! Yet the majority of people don’t seem to yet have looked into them rationally and intelligently. Thankfully, that seems to be slowly but increasingly changing. As the above-linked article ridiculing the nonsense claims of a Jewish true-believer demonstrates. The Jewish true-believer being rightly ridiculed posted this quasi-religious nonsense online:
See the article ridiculing this guy’s true- believer insanity here:
|
|
|
Post by been_there on May 20, 2023 13:30:09 GMT
Here below is an article that provides further evidence that more people are not only questioning the legally-protected, thought-police maintained ‘holocaust’ narrative, but are analysing the social structures that permits this mass-deception to occur.
And they are devising ways to combat that structure and its mass influence.
What follows is an excerpt from an article published online that I have edited considerably to be less offensive to my own views. I post it as it has an interesting suggestion on how best to discuss the obvious flaws of the holocaust narrative with your average man in the street.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Jun 6, 2023 16:34:54 GMT
Here is an excerpt confirming that increasing numbers of people are expressing their true opinions of the anti-German hate-speech protected and promoted as ‘the holocaust’.
The standard response is to demonise such honest, courageous people as H-deniers who supposedly doubt the narrative BECAUSE they are ‘anti-semites’. This is a false but submissively-accepted conjecture, as the following quotes from an article written by a person born and raised in Israel as an Israeli Jew, demonstrate. The only recourse that holocaust-promoting haters have is to demonise such honest people of jewish ethnicity with the nonsense accusation of being a ‘self-hating jew’. Which is how they describe this blogger, musician and author. 🙄
|
|
Nessie
✍️
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Jun 7, 2023 8:30:41 GMT
That Jews denounce the "Holocaust religion" makes the revisionist claim it is a hoax, even more suspect. How can a hoax survive, when people will not cooperate to maintain it?
|
|