|
Post by Ulios on Jan 17, 2022 22:12:07 GMT
It would not surprise me if this was a scam just to get people to pay a buck to subscribe. It is noticed that Jewish Internet sites are so full of ads etc it makes them almost unreadable. Here is a more readable version of the same story, sadly with the ads. Times of Israel
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Jan 19, 2022 15:23:34 GMT
Here is further evidence that the public’s understanding of the ‘h’-narrative is changing. And the change is towards increasing awareness that ‘the holocaust’ as history is deeply flawed and innaccurate. Here is an admission — in this case by Jewish organisations dedicated to promoting a particular version of WW2 history — that ‘holocaust revisionism’ is gaining adherents. And to combat this increase in factual awareness of the actual empirical and historical evidence regarding the Jewish experience during WW2, these Jewish organisations are increasing their programmes to indoctrinate impressionable school children with their legally-protected version. www.jns.org/yad-vashem-launches-academy-to-train-future-leaders-in-holocaust-awareness/Here is another proof that the understanding and attitude to this legally protected ‘history’ is changing. For decades the promoters of the ‘holocaust’ narrative who have been relentlessly claiming there was an attempted genocide of ALL Jews, have also insisted that this claim is the most evidenced historiography ever! So... Check out this filmed interview with Ephraim Kaye, a director at Yad Vashem Holocaust Museum in Israel. In this segment taken from an interview on how to combat increasing acceptance of revisionist arguments (which he falsely misrepresents as ‘denial’) Mr. Kaye admits that in reality there is no physical, forensic, archeological empirical evidence for the Jewish, genocidal, mass-murder narrative called ‘the holocaust’. www.bitchute.com/video/RIks1sxQ19Xl/ If you are in Europe and so forbidden to watch this revealing segment on BITCHUTE taken from an interview with a Jewish Holocaust Museum director, here is the full interview on Youtube. Watch from 4:00 to hear him admitting what REVISIONISTS revealed to the world: viz. that the H mass-gassing narrative has NO supporting forensic, archeological or empirical evidence supporting it at the alleged mass-gassing sites.
The intro is interesting as by this man’s definition Nick Terry, Nessie and many other H-promoters who like to argue online are actually holocaust d-e-n-i-e-r-s. 😀
|
|
|
Post by Turnagain on Jan 20, 2022 4:51:01 GMT
Geez, if we don't believe what the Jews say we're "anti-semitic". Who knew?
BTW, does anyone believe this clown? Such mindless crap as "steam shovels" were used to dig the mass graves? Every trace of the murdered Jews was hidden? Ashes dumped into the river and the "ash pond"? Jeezus H, gimme' a break.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Feb 1, 2022 12:03:49 GMT
Further evidence that attitudes to WW2 are slowly, slowly changing, here is a recent news story in a main-stream media news outlet that is admitting and informing about the wider context of incarcerating people for their ethnicity. It is admitting and informing its readers that this did NOT only happen in Axis-occupied territories in Europe. Here it concentrates on the experience of that in Britain. The journalism is edited extracts from a book to be published this month called The island of extraordinary captives by Simon Parkin. Previously, main-stream media has concealed this history. And holocaust promulgators have effectively ‘lied by omission’ by not including this context in their quasi-religious, Jew-centric ’holocaust’ This journalism is still lying by ommission by infering that it was only newly arrived refugees who were treated as potential ’fifth columnists’. But it is still a welcome step in the right direction. The article can be read here: www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/01/when-britain-imprisoned-refugees-second-world-war-internment-camps The above photo shows part of an internment camp for ‘ enemy aliens’ in Huyton, Liverpool in 1940.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Feb 4, 2022 15:14:37 GMT
Here is an article put on the internet on March 14th, 2013. And the person put his name to it!! Very commendable and courageous. Proof that attitudes are not only changing in private, but that the changed understandings are being made public also. As the recent cases of Ursula Haverbeck, Alison Chabloz and Monika Schaefer also more recently demonstrate! The whole article been read here: immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-holocaust-organized-jewrys.html
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Apr 12, 2022 7:37:23 GMT
Here is an interesting account showing how propaganda and main-stream media works. It concerns the changing portrayal of the Finns and Stalin to the British people during WW2.
It reminds me of my own experience of this during the run-up to and aftermath of the first Iraq war, 1990-91. I was in India at the time for a period of about six months. The Indian newspapers (in English) were all pro-Saddam and were criticising the neo-imperialist behaviour of Britain and America. When it was clear the defeat of Saddam’s armies was over, the news content changed abruptly and literally overnight. Suddenly all the reporting was anti-Saddam.
Here is the reminiscence that shows this also occurred with the Finns...
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Apr 20, 2022 7:37:04 GMT
Further evidence of more people realising that the Shoah narrative is not accurate history.
This time it is evidenced in the 283 comments to an article praising Nick Kollerströms banned book called BREAKING THE SPELL’. An article that is written by someone using their real name, praising a book published by someone using their real name!
Here is one comment as an example. It is by someone who ALSO courageously gives their name. That fact alone — that so many are prepared to face the consequences of expressing their doubt — I suggest is evidence of a great change: people are increasingly speak out without hiding their identity.
|
|
Nessie
🦕
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 (Nessies forum)
Posts: 3,255
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 20, 2022 8:01:01 GMT
.... Watch from 4:00 to hear him admitting what REVISIONISTS revealed to the world: viz. that the H mass-gassing narrative has NO supporting forensic, archeological or empirical evidence supporting it at the alleged mass-gassing sites.
The intro is interesting as by this man’s definition Nick Terry, Nessie and many other H-promoters who like to argue online are actually holocaust d-e-n-i-e-r-s. 😀At around 5.00 and 6.30 minutes, he explains why there is not much to see at A-B and TII, it is because the Nazis destroyed so much of the evidence. He does not say there is literally "NO" supporting evidence.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Apr 20, 2022 11:04:59 GMT
Here is another proof that the understanding and attitude to this legally protected ‘history’ is changing. For decades the promoters of the ‘holocaust’ narrative who have been relentlessly claiming there was an attempted genocide of ALL Jews, have also insisted that this claim is the most evidenced historiography ever! So... Check out this filmed interview with Ephraim Kaye, a director at Yad Vashem Holocaust Museum in Israel. In this segment taken from an interview on how to combat increasing acceptance of revisionist arguments (which he falsely misrepresents as ‘denial’) Mr. Kaye admits that in reality there is no physical, forensic, archeological empirical evidence for the Jewish, genocidal, mass-murder narrative called ‘the holocaust’. www.bitchute.com/video/RIks1sxQ19Xl/If you are in Europe and so forbidden to watch this revealing segment on BITCHUTE taken from an interview with a Jewish Holocaust Museum director, here is the full interview on Youtube. Watch from 4:00 to hear him admitting what REVISIONISTS revealed to the world: viz. that the H mass-gassing narrative has NO supporting forensic, archeological or empirical evidence supporting it at the alleged mass-gassing sites.
The intro is interesting as by this man’s definition Nick Terry, Nessie and many other H-promoters who like to argue online are actually holocaust d-e-n-i-e-r-s. 😀At 6:10 Ephraim Kaye makes the reality very clear. After repeating the unevidenced claims he admits that it is only a narrative that is believed because of decades of conditioning, nothing more: “But when you look for physical evidence THERE IS NOTHING there!”This approach is finally an honest one. And it is borne out of the realisation that the claim of this narrative of genocide by mass-gassing being extremely well-evidenced is A LIE! That clsim is a hoax. A grand deception!
One that Ephraim Kaye also admits he finds “distressing and depressing” [4:41].
Yeah! I sympathise.
He is a director of a story he himself has been indoctrinated with since childhood as being true and factual. But on reaching adulthood and actually studying the revisionist arguments, he has to admit they are correct: there is no evidence supporting this anti-German, racist propaganda.
But instead of revising the narrative to fit this revelatory realisation, he does the opposite. He falsely smears such revealers of truth with the logically fallacious argument of ad hominem - he demonises them as Holocaust d.e.n.i.e.r.s’.
SUMMARY: There is no empirical evidence for this atrocity propaganda. And Jews who are honest enough to admit that still resort to lying by accusing the ones who revealed that with false perjoratives.
|
|
Nessie
🦕
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 (Nessies forum)
Posts: 3,255
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 20, 2022 12:28:18 GMT
...At 6:10 Ephraim Kaye makes the reality very clear. After repeating the unevidenced claims he admits that it is only a narrative that is believed because of decades of conditioning, nothing more: “But when you look for physical evidence THERE IS NOTHING there!”This approach is finally an honest one. And it is borne out of the realisation that the claim of this narrative of genocide by mass-gassing being extremely well-evidenced is A LIE! That clsim is a hoax. A grand deception!
....After 6:10, Kaye goes on to explain why visitors to TII have no physical evidence to see. Himmler ordered as much evidence as possible to be destroyed. That is why when people visit TII, they cannot look round the gas chambers, or at mass graves. The Nazis, as criminals often do, did as much as possible to hide or destroy the evidence that would convict them.
|
|