|
Post by Ulios on Jan 17, 2022 22:12:07 GMT
It would not surprise me if this was a scam just to get people to pay a buck to subscribe. It is noticed that Jewish Internet sites are so full of ads etc it makes them almost unreadable. Here is a more readable version of the same story, sadly with the ads. Times of Israel
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Jan 19, 2022 15:23:34 GMT
Here is further evidence that the public’s understanding of the ‘h’-narrative is changing. And the change is towards increasing awareness that ‘the holocaust’ as history is deeply flawed and innaccurate. Here is an admission — in this case by Jewish organisations dedicated to promoting a particular version of WW2 history — that ‘holocaust revisionism’ is gaining adherents. And to combat this increase in factual awareness of the actual empirical and historical evidence regarding the Jewish experience during WW2, these Jewish organisations are increasing their programmes to indoctrinate impressionable school children with their legally-protected version. www.jns.org/yad-vashem-launches-academy-to-train-future-leaders-in-holocaust-awareness/Here is another proof that the understanding and attitude to this legally protected ‘history’ is changing. For decades the promoters of the ‘holocaust’ narrative who have been relentlessly claiming there was an attempted genocide of ALL Jews, have also insisted that this claim is the most evidenced historiography ever! So... Check out this filmed interview with Ephraim Kaye, a director at Yad Vashem Holocaust Museum in Israel. In this segment taken from an interview on how to combat increasing acceptance of revisionist arguments (which he falsely misrepresents as ‘denial’) Mr. Kaye admits that in reality there is no physical, forensic, archeological empirical evidence for the Jewish, genocidal, mass-murder narrative called ‘the holocaust’. www.bitchute.com/video/RIks1sxQ19Xl/ If you are in Europe and so forbidden to watch this revealing segment on BITCHUTE taken from an interview with a Jewish Holocaust Museum director, here is the full interview on Youtube. Watch from 4:00 to hear him admitting what REVISIONISTS revealed to the world: viz. that the H mass-gassing narrative has NO supporting forensic, archeological or empirical evidence supporting it at the alleged mass-gassing sites.
The intro is interesting as by this man’s definition Nick Terry, Nessie and many other H-promoters who like to argue online are actually holocaust d-e-n-i-e-r-s. 😀
|
|
|
Post by Turnagain on Jan 20, 2022 4:51:01 GMT
Geez, if we don't believe what the Jews say we're "anti-semitic". Who knew?
BTW, does anyone believe this clown? Such mindless crap as "steam shovels" were used to dig the mass graves? Every trace of the murdered Jews was hidden? Ashes dumped into the river and the "ash pond"? Jeezus H, gimme' a break.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Feb 1, 2022 12:03:49 GMT
Further evidence that attitudes to WW2 are slowly, slowly changing, here is a recent news story in a main-stream media news outlet that is admitting and informing about the wider context of incarcerating people for their ethnicity. It is admitting and informing its readers that this did NOT only happen in Axis-occupied territories in Europe. Here it concentrates on the experience of that in Britain. The journalism is edited extracts from a book to be published this month called The island of extraordinary captives by Simon Parkin. Previously, main-stream media has concealed this history. And holocaust promulgators have effectively ‘lied by omission’ by not including this context in their quasi-religious, Jew-centric ’holocaust’ This journalism is still lying by ommission by infering that it was only newly arrived refugees who were treated as potential ’fifth columnists’. But it is still a welcome step in the right direction. The article can be read here: www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/01/when-britain-imprisoned-refugees-second-world-war-internment-camps The above photo shows part of an internment camp for ‘ enemy aliens’ in Huyton, Liverpool in 1940.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Feb 4, 2022 15:14:37 GMT
Here is an article put on the internet on March 14th, 2013. And the person put his name to it!! Very commendable and courageous. Proof that attitudes are not only changing in private, but that the changed understandings are being made public also. As the recent cases of Ursula Haverbeck, Alison Chabloz and Monika Schaefer also more recently demonstrate! The whole article been read here: immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-holocaust-organized-jewrys.html
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Apr 12, 2022 7:37:23 GMT
Here is an interesting account showing how propaganda and main-stream media works. It concerns the changing portrayal of the Finns and Stalin to the British people during WW2.
It reminds me of my own experience of this during the run-up to and aftermath of the first Iraq war, 1990-91. I was in India at the time for a period of about six months. The Indian newspapers (in English) were all pro-Saddam and were criticising the neo-imperialist behaviour of Britain and America. When it was clear the defeat of Saddam’s armies was over, the news content changed abruptly and literally overnight. Suddenly all the reporting was anti-Saddam.
Here is the reminiscence that shows this also occurred with the Finns...
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Apr 20, 2022 7:37:04 GMT
Further evidence of more people realising that the Shoah narrative is not accurate history.
This time it is evidenced in the 283 comments to an article praising Nick Kollerströms banned book called BREAKING THE SPELL’. An article that is written by someone using their real name, praising a book published by someone using their real name!
Here is one comment as an example. It is by someone who ALSO courageously gives their name. That fact alone — that so many are prepared to face the consequences of expressing their doubt — I suggest is evidence of a great change: people are increasingly speak out without hiding their identity.
|
|
Nessie
🦕
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 (Nessies forum)
Posts: 4,828
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 20, 2022 8:01:01 GMT
.... Watch from 4:00 to hear him admitting what REVISIONISTS revealed to the world: viz. that the H mass-gassing narrative has NO supporting forensic, archeological or empirical evidence supporting it at the alleged mass-gassing sites.
The intro is interesting as by this man’s definition Nick Terry, Nessie and many other H-promoters who like to argue online are actually holocaust d-e-n-i-e-r-s. 😀At around 5.00 and 6.30 minutes, he explains why there is not much to see at A-B and TII, it is because the Nazis destroyed so much of the evidence. He does not say there is literally "NO" supporting evidence.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Apr 20, 2022 11:04:59 GMT
Here is another proof that the understanding and attitude to this legally protected ‘history’ is changing. For decades the promoters of the ‘holocaust’ narrative who have been relentlessly claiming there was an attempted genocide of ALL Jews, have also insisted that this claim is the most evidenced historiography ever! So... Check out this filmed interview with Ephraim Kaye, a director at Yad Vashem Holocaust Museum in Israel. In this segment taken from an interview on how to combat increasing acceptance of revisionist arguments (which he falsely misrepresents as ‘denial’) Mr. Kaye admits that in reality there is no physical, forensic, archeological empirical evidence for the Jewish, genocidal, mass-murder narrative called ‘the holocaust’. www.bitchute.com/video/RIks1sxQ19Xl/If you are in Europe and so forbidden to watch this revealing segment on BITCHUTE taken from an interview with a Jewish Holocaust Museum director, here is the full interview on Youtube. Watch from 4:00 to hear him admitting what REVISIONISTS revealed to the world: viz. that the H mass-gassing narrative has NO supporting forensic, archeological or empirical evidence supporting it at the alleged mass-gassing sites.
The intro is interesting as by this man’s definition Nick Terry, Nessie and many other H-promoters who like to argue online are actually holocaust d-e-n-i-e-r-s. 😀At 6:10 Ephraim Kaye makes the reality very clear. After repeating the unevidenced claims he admits that it is only a narrative that is believed because of decades of conditioning, nothing more: “But when you look for physical evidence THERE IS NOTHING there!”This approach is finally an honest one. And it is borne out of the realisation that the claim of this narrative of genocide by mass-gassing being extremely well-evidenced is A LIE! That clsim is a hoax. A grand deception!
One that Ephraim Kaye also admits he finds “distressing and depressing” [4:41].
Yeah! I sympathise.
He is a director of a story he himself has been indoctrinated with since childhood as being true and factual. But on reaching adulthood and actually studying the revisionist arguments, he has to admit they are correct: there is no evidence supporting this anti-German, racist propaganda.
But instead of revising the narrative to fit this revelatory realisation, he does the opposite. He falsely smears such revealers of truth with the logically fallacious argument of ad hominem - he demonises them as Holocaust d.e.n.i.e.r.s’.
SUMMARY: There is no empirical evidence for this atrocity propaganda. And Jews who are honest enough to admit that still resort to lying by accusing the ones who revealed that with false perjoratives.
|
|
Nessie
🦕
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 (Nessies forum)
Posts: 4,828
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 20, 2022 12:28:18 GMT
...At 6:10 Ephraim Kaye makes the reality very clear. After repeating the unevidenced claims he admits that it is only a narrative that is believed because of decades of conditioning, nothing more: “But when you look for physical evidence THERE IS NOTHING there!”This approach is finally an honest one. And it is borne out of the realisation that the claim of this narrative of genocide by mass-gassing being extremely well-evidenced is A LIE! That clsim is a hoax. A grand deception!
....After 6:10, Kaye goes on to explain why visitors to TII have no physical evidence to see. Himmler ordered as much evidence as possible to be destroyed. That is why when people visit TII, they cannot look round the gas chambers, or at mass graves. The Nazis, as criminals often do, did as much as possible to hide or destroy the evidence that would convict them.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Apr 20, 2022 14:58:37 GMT
Further evidence of more people realising that the Shoah narrative is not accurate history. This time it is evidenced in the 283 comments to an article praising Nick Kollerströms banned book called BREAKING THE SPELL’. An article that is written by someone using their real name, praising a book published by someone using their real name! Here is one comment as an example. It is by someone who ALSO courageously gives their name. That fact alone — that so many are prepared to face the consequences of expressing their doubt — I suggest is evidence of a great change: people are increasingly speaking out, without hiding their identity.  It is a great book title, that Mr. Black is courageously and positively reviewing. Because what has become known since the 1970s as ‘the holocaust’ is in reality a pseudo-historical narrative that only claims an attempted genocide of ALL Jews by mass murder using poisonous gas. The REALITY though is that it has no credible evidence supporting that claim. As was admitted in the above linked talk by a supposed expert, Ephraim Kaye. The vast majority only believe it because they have been mislead about that FACT! We have all been told the exact opposite. As anyone who investigates it honestly soon comes to realise. It has been foisted upon a gullible public by decades of relentless indoctrination, childhood brain-washing (education) and increasingly draconian thought control laws. To come out of all of that can fairly be likened to ‘ breaking’ a kind of magical ‘ spell’. 
|
|
|
Post by been_there on May 5, 2022 12:08:10 GMT
THOMAS DALTON has recently written a critique of the Canadian government’s decision to become the ninteenth country to criminalise expressing certain thoughts and the evidence supporting those thoughts. It was published a few days ago on APRIL 30th, 2022 He has given it this title:
|
|
|
Post by been_there on May 5, 2022 12:53:15 GMT
The article about Canada’s capitulation to thought-crime laws concerning the protected pseudo-history has attracted some interesting comments. 🙂
|
|
|
Post by been_there on May 24, 2022 8:51:47 GMT
A new Israeli film tackles the taboo: did six million Jews die in the Holocaust? Filmmaker David Fisher’s latest documentary, the controversial ‘The Round Number,’ explores how the toll was determined and why many are loath to call it into question A new documentary film by Israeli filmmaker David Fisher is provoking controversy for its attempts to confirm whether six million Jews were killed during the Holocaust.
The film, titled ‘ The Round Number’ played at the Jerusalem Film Festival last year and aired [in Feb 2022] on the HOT8 channel in Israel. The film deals with the round number of six million Jews killed in the Holocaust, how it was established and why it has become so untouchable, despite obviously not being an exact figure. According to a description of the film shared by its distribution company: “ ‘The Round Number’ explores why and how the number six million was written into the canon, and what its meaning can teach us about the Holocaust. Fisher speaks with a wide range of historians and other figures in the film, in an attempt to answer the question. “...Both of my parents, who are Holocaust survivors, lived their lives like victims. So from my perspective, the number is not six million, but six million and two.”Fisher, who acknowledges that even asking such a question is controversial, said he was not seeking a definitive answer or figure. “I wasn’t trying to do a count myself and I didn’t seek out people who were involved in the counting,” Fisher told Haaretz in a recent interview. But he noted that he came across a variety of different numbers from historians and other figures over the years, suggesting that the number could be higher or lower than six million. “So I was curious where this number six million came from, and how it became so fixed and so sanctified that people warn you to leave it alone”.“The number six million has become an institution, and I wanted to stick a pin in it to try to understand where this number came from,” Fisher added.
Yad Vashem historian Dina Porat, who was interviewed for the film, said it treads on dangerous ground. “The film will leave the borders of Israel, it already has captions in English, and it is a problem”. Porat told Channel 12 news of her concerns that it will call Holocaust memorial and memory into question. “I’m worried about it.”
...Fisher told Channel 12 that the touchy nature of his latest film has made it difficult to sell to film festivals abroad. “In Germany they told me: ‘We can’t allow ourselves to air such a film to our audience. We are worried that the film will come across as if we are supporting Holocaust denial’.”When the film was released in Israel last year, it was praised for its nuanced approach to a complicated and highly controversial idea. “‘The Round Number’ is a thought-provoking film, even provocative in its own humble way,” wrote a film reviewer for Yedioth Ahronoth, “about a pain that will not abide, about historical truth, and about the secularization of holiness.” www.timesofisrael.com/a-new-israeli-film-tackles-the-taboo-did-six-million-jews-die-in-the-holocaust/
|
|
|
Post by been_there on May 24, 2022 16:50:19 GMT
I thought I would summarise a few of the statements in the above quoted Times of Israel film promotion article. Believers like Nessie and Jeff never reply to such posts as I think they know there is nothing there they can pour snide upon (Jeff’s tactic) or knee-jerk contradict (Nessie’smtactic) as ALL the statements have been made by Holocaust-believing Jews. They can call skeptics, revisionists and doubters names, but... not other H-believing Jews. I have edited down statements from the Jewish journalistic film-promotion to eight points: A new Israeli film tackles the taboo: did six million Jews die in the Holocaust? 1.) ...the round number of six million Jews killed in the Holocaust... has become so untouchable, despite obviously not being an exact figure. 2.) “...Both of my parents, who are Holocaust survivors, lived their lives like victims. So from my perspective, the number is not six million, but six million and two.”3.) Fisher acknowledges that even asking such a question is controversial... 4.) “I wasn’t trying to do a count myself and I didn’t seek out people who were involved in the counting...” 5.) “... I was curious [why] this number six million ...became so fixed and so sanctified that people warn you to leave it alone”.6.) Yad Vashem historian Dina Porat, who was interviewed for the film, said it treads on dangerous ground. “The film ...is a problem”. ...it will call Holocaust memorial and memory into question. “I’m worried about it.”
7.) ...Fisher [said] “In Germany they told me: ‘We can’t allow ourselves to air such a film to our audience. We are worried that the film will come across as if we are supporting Holocaust denial’.”8.) ”...’ The Round Number’ is a thought-provoking film... about historical truth, and about the secularization of holiness.” www.timesofisrael.com/a-new-israeli-film-tackles-the-taboo-did-six-million-jews-die-in-the-holocaust/1.) A Jewish film maker and a Jewish journalist admit that the alleged deathtoll of Jews by genocide is an obviously false number. They also admit that it is not only ahistorical, but that it has been made [by Jewish organisations] a false belief that can not be discussed. 2.) And yet the Jewish filmaker feels he is allowed to inflate it even more by adding his parents to that DEATH-total!! Despite them OBVIOUSLY not having been killed by anyone — let alone Nazis — during that war!!! 😮🤔🤪 Proving yet again that Jews feel they own this supposedly ’historical’ narrative and can do what they want with it: exaggerate it, minimise it, question it, promote it, whatever. But non-Jews (who many Jews racistly refer to as goys) can’t, as that would be ’hollow-hoax denial’. 3.) The Jewish film-maker can make money out of doing what is forbidden to non-Jews, as he admits that ”even asking a question” about the death-toll would create publicity for his film as it is “controversial”. 4.) The Jewish film-maker admits he isn’t interested in the actual, factually correct ’hollow-hoax’ death total! 😮 5.) The Jewish film-maker and the Jewish journalist admit what revisionists and skeptics are persecuted, criminalised and punished for doing: viz. admitting the promoted death total of Jews in ’THE Holocaust’ is an OBVIOUSLY false but fixed and sanctified number “that people warn you to leave alone”. 6.) Professional high-priests and mercernaries who have been and still are making a living from promoting the hoax are worried that this film might damage their H-religion, their own credibility and their livlihoods. 7.) Germans are not permitted to see something that could go against their conditioning/brainwashing. 8.) The Jewish journalist tacitly admits this sacrosanct number is part of a quasi-religious belief, NOT a genuine historiography!
|
|