Here is an example of how current attitudes will have to change — and need to be seen to be changing — regarding how history in schools is to be taught to children, if laws are to be applied consistently.
That change is needed is demonstrated by a current controversy concerning an example given by a school administrator regarding the application of a new House Bill in the state of Texas. The Bill requires school libraries and teachers to make available books offering opposing views on historical subjects. Here is what the Bill states:
“requires a teacher who chooses to discuss such [controversial] events or issues, to the best of the teacher's ability, to strive to explore those topics from diverse and contending perspectives without giving deference to any one perspective”.
Gina Peddy is the executive director of curriculum and instruction for the district who is at the centre of the story. She created a huge controversy after she was recorded giving an example of a historic event that would require a teacher to keep on hand other books with "opposing" views.
Gina Peddy chose to use ‘the Holocaust’ as an example of a historic event requiring a teacher to make available "opposing" views.
She is recorded as telling the teachers this:
"Just try to remember the concepts of (Bill) 3979 and make sure that if you have a book on the Holocaust, that you have one that has opposing... that has other perspectives."
You can hear the recording of her statement here:
Last Edit: Oct 31, 2021 12:41:35 GMT by been_there
Republican state Senator Bryan Hughes, who wrote the bill that became the law, denied that anyone should come up with alternative views on what he called matters of “good and evil” or to remove books that offer only one perspective on the Holocaust.
Jews in Peddy’s school district and elsewhere in both Texas and nationally have inevitably also risen to the bait, denouncing any attempt made to challenge what they view as an issue fundamental to their understanding of their place in the world and in history. One Jewish former student Jake Berman asserted that “The facts are that there are not two sides of the Holocaust. The Nazis systematically killed millions of people.”
Ledbetter, Robison and Hughes should perhaps consider that they are suggesting that their new law should only apply on “controversial” racial issues, not on other historical developments and it is curious that educated people should consider a multi-faceted transnational historical event that has inter alia a highly politicized context a “fact.” The holocaust narrative in and of itself is the creation of men and women after the fact with an agenda to justify the creation and support for the State of Israel and should be subject to the same inquiry as any other facet of the Second World War and what came after.
The tale of “the holocaust” is essentially a contrived bit of history that serves a political objective wrapped up in what purports to be a powerful statement regarding man’s inhumanity to man. Jewish groups generally speaking consider the standard narrative with its highly questionable six million dead, gas chambers, extermination camps, and soap made from body fat to be something like sacred ground, with its memorialization of the uniqueness of Jewish suffering. Serious scholars who have actually looked at the narrative and the numbers and sequences of events are not surprisingly skeptical of many of the details.
As a first step, it is helpful to look at controversial Professor Norman Finkelstein’s carefully documented book The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering. Finkelstein, to be sure, believes there was something like a genocide of European Jews and even lost some family members due to it. He does not, however, necessarily believe many of the details provided by the standard narrative and official promoters of that story to include the numerous holocaust museums. In his view, powerful interests have hijacked “the Holocaust,” and use it to further their own objectives. He wrote “Organized Jewry has exploited the Nazi holocaust to deflect criticism of Israel’s and its own indefensible policies. Nazi genocide has been used to justify criminal policies of the Israeli state and US support for these policies.”
And there is also a money angle, as there often is. Per Finkelstein, Jewish organizations in the US have also exploited the situation of the dwindling number of aging holocaust survivors to extort “staggering sums of money from the rest of the world. This is not done not for the benefit of needy survivors but for the financial advantage of these organizations.”
As taking courses in the holocaust are mandated in the public school systems of twenty states (and soon to be more due to pressure from local Jewish groups) and is used to validate the billions of US taxpayer dollars given annually to the state of Israel it would seem that supporters of the narrative should have the confidence as well as sufficient integrity to defend their product. But that is, of course, not the case. They would prefer to have their chosen narrative unchallenged, raising the usual claims of anti-Semitism and “holocaust denial” to silence critics. One of the “textbooks” frequently used in public schools that mandate holocaust education is Night by Elie Wiesel, whom Finkelstein has dubbed “the high huckster of the holocaust.” Night claims to be autobiographical but is full of errors in time and place. It is at least in part a work of fiction. Similarly, the ‘Diary of Anne Frank’ was published after editing by her survivor father and parts of it have been challenged.
As a general rule, contentious issues where advocates attempt to silence opponents by claiming that what they are promoting is based on fact and cannot be challenged should be challenged.
In Europe, powerful Jewish constituencies have even made it illegal to criticize or deny the holocaust narrative. In America, that day may soon be coming as Jewish groups increasingly seek to criminalize questioning of the factual basis of the holocaust as well as any criticism of Israel.
Last Edit: Oct 31, 2021 12:53:43 GMT by been_there
It is somebody questioning the official narrative regarding Dr. Josef Mengele on Quora. Most of the replies are from people who believe and repeat the usual non-credible nonsense.
But there are a few who reply more intelligently. Plus their replies receive ‘likes’. AND they haven’t been deleted!!! 😮
Here is the question:
Was Josef Mengele really as bad as people say he was?
And here are some of the replies from people who appear to have seen through the highly improbable and unlikely official narrative:
The Angel of no Deaths
Mengele had a doctorate in anthropology and one in medicine, and began a career as a researcher, he was considered as one of the most promising member of his profession. He joined the Nazi Party in 1937 and the SS in 1938.
From all accounts, Mengele was a very accomplished and intelligent man, from a very learned family. Someone with his intelligence would never attempt to inject blue dye into the eyeballs of Jews to see if he could transform them into “aryans”. All those horror stories were invented after the war either by the winners of those who would profit from such horrific lies.
Truth is, Josef Mengele was not tried at Nuremberg, he wasn’t even wanted for war crimes nor did any witnesses mention him, which is extraordinary considering what a prominent role he allegedly played in Auschwitz lore. Furthermore, Mengele wasn’t even the head doctor at Auschwitz, that post was held by Dr. Eduard Wirths who received commendations for his work in stopping the spread of deadly typhus among the Jewish prisoners.
After the war ended, Mengele was going to turn himself in, but when he learned that he would not receive a fair hearing, he decided to flee to South America, where he spent the rest of his life, lucky for him, the accused at the Nuremberg trials were indeed tortured and most had their testes crushed. In fact Mengele was using his real name in south America until he learned that Adolf Eichman had been abducted by an Israeli secret team.
After his death, his private diaries went up for auction, and a wealthy Jew bought them but never published them. We can be certain that if there was anything incriminating or which substantiated the criminal allegations against Mengele, those diaries would have been reprinted in every newspaper in the world. That they weren’t tells you what you need to know about this Jewish boogeyman, this so-called “Angel of Death”.
Here is a Jewish women actively promoting what Prof. Norman Finkelstein called ‘the holocaust industry’.
She is promoting the sale of books on the subject including works of fiction.
But although she refers to what she psychologcally tries to reinforce as “the truth of the holocaust”, she inadvertently confirms that increasing numbers of people either don’t accept that it is the whole ‘truth’, or don’t care either way.
Rachel Weingarten | Nov. 12, 2021
With the disturbing increase ...and a wave of Holocaust denial and whitewashing [skeptism, better info and indifference], it's important to know and understand the truth[?] of the Holocaust, which is where these must-read [?] books come in.
...it has become one of my missions to combat Holocaust denial [skepticism and availability of unbiased knowledge]. That’s why I work with many Holocaust ‘survivors’ and help educate others about the true [?] horrors of that time and how to recognize Holocaust denial and whitewashing [skeptism, doubt and better information]. One of the most important things you can do is to read the facts [?] from reputable [?]sources, and that includes choosing the most highly recommended Holocaust books, some of which are listed below...
Nonfiction Holocaust Books Works of fiction are entertaining, but to truly understand the Holocaust, non-fiction tomes are your best bet — especially those written by Holocaust survivors who live with the history every day. [?!?!? 🤔]
According to Rachel, people who were alive in Europe during WW2 and were Jewish and are still alive now, so who were children or infants — STILL live with and experience the effects of that historical narrative “every day”. 😮🙄
And here is a Jewish newspaper conceding that there is an “increasing” realisation that the H-story can not withstand intelligent scrutiny and is worthy of ridicule:
By BRENDA KATTEN Published: NOVEMBER 1, 2021
“At a time of ...an increase in Holocaust denial [unbiased knowledge] and trivialisation...”
The following article contains a blatant contradiction: it complains of the lack of diversity in history education. But then applauds and details state legislation that enforces only one version of history by protecting a particular WW2 narrative from analysis and revision!! 🙄
But one thing that the article inadvertently acknowledges is the INCREASING numbers of people seeing through the hypocrisy and indoctrination / historical brain-washing.
That reality of increasing awareness of the misinformation is then misrepresented in two ways: 1.) by equating the realisation of the amount of “exaggeration” in the narrative as “denial” of the narrative as a whole. 2.) by equating realisation of the degree of misrepresentation as somehow being ‘anti-semitic’?!?! 🤔🤪
BOTTOM LINE: the article admits that increasing numbers of people are becoming aware of this deception and misrepresentation.
U.S. education system failing to advance diversity in history classrooms
by COURTNEY ERDMAN · April 5, 2021
UW professor Frank Tuerkheimer noticed the lack of diversity in education, specifically around the Holocaust. He decided to leave his career as a federal prosecutor and become a teacher in order to increase Holocaust awareness. Tuerkheimer teaches a course on the post-Holocaust prosecution of those who contributed to the death of Jewish people.
Holocaust denial is a phenomenon in which people believe the genocide of Jews did not happen or was exaggerated, according to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum...
Tuerkheimer said: “This book that I reviewed showed me that Holocaust denial [revision] was far more institutionalised, far more serious and far more widespread. And then when I kind of paid more attention to statistics, [it was] really discouraging: a significant percentage of people in the United States didn’t think there was a Holocaust...”
Here is an article showing how reasonable, critical skepticism of the compulsory, legally-protected, anti-German ‘mass-murder-by-gas’ hate-trope known as ‘THE holocaust’ is increasing and reaching a wider readership.
Funny how it goes with the Holocaust story: time and again, an ugly bit of truth slips out. When that happens, yet one more piece of the charade comes to light, for all to see. For a brief moment, one more embarrassing truth catches the public eye, only to quickly be cast into the depths of the memory hole. Only through diligence, hard work, and a bit of luck do such things come to assume a greater significance.
This time, sharp eyes caught the slip-up. The issue in question is an obscure World War II concentration camp in present-day Croatia, by the name of Jasenovac. The camp—which operated for around three and a half years, from mid-1941 until war’s end—is, by any reasonable accounting, all but irrelevant to the Holocaust story. Even according to the US Holocaust Memorial Museum, only some “12,000 to 20,000 Jews” died there, which means that the camp accounts for, at best, 0.33% of the presumed Jewish death toll of 6 million. Were it not for a recent blunder by the Jerusalem Post, I would likely never have spent a moment on the topic. In the grand Holocaust narrative, there are much larger fish to fry. But the latest gaff gives us a chance to shine a light on the on-going fraud that is the Holocaust. When the Jews themselves put a foot in their collective mouths, we should make the most of it.
The subject at hand is an article that briefly appeared on the Post website, titled “This disgraceful mocking of the Holocaust needs to stop now” (now available here; the original URL has been deleted). Written by an Australian journalist named David Goldman, the short essay obsesses over a three-year-old Croatian television interview in which historian and Croatian Jew Ivo Goldstein expounds on the “increasingly problematic” camp at Jasenovac. The interview, from 2018, included this question of Goldstein: “Many have commented on the lack of forensic evidence from this particular camp. Can you explain why this is the case?” (meaning, why there is an absence of evidence). Goldstein then dropped his “bombshell” reply: “Because in April 1945, Hitler flew in special machines to Jasenovac. These machines were used to dissolve the bones that were left.”
Several points here: One, in all of Holocaust historiography, there is no actual or even rumored documentation of any such “bone dissolving machines.” There were alleged bone crushers, driven by diesel engines; here is one alleged photo. But these have been shown to be fraudulent. The Nazis also allegedly used chlorinated lime (quicklime) to try to decompose corpses at Treblinka and Belzec, but this chemical, when used, only reduces the odor; it does nothing to hasten decomposition. “Dissolving,” especially for bones, implies the use of acid or some other strong chemical process, but again, such claims are completely unknown in the literature. Hence Goldman rightly refers to these as “hitherto unheard-of machines.” Perhaps there was some confusion on Goldstein’s part, and he actually meant ‘crushing,’ not ‘dissolving.’ But again, we have no reliable evidence that such crushing machines were ever used by the Germans.
Two, this idea seems to be a pure invention by Goldstein to explain away a troublesome fact, namely, lack of forensic evidence at Jasenovac—meaning any corpses, ash, or other human remains. And by “pure invention,” I mean an outright lie. By all accounts, Goldstein lied to cover up a critical and damning fact. Anyone who has studied the Holocaust story knows that such lies are legion.
Three, the whole premise that the Germans, in the final throes of defeat, would take the trouble to send anything like “bone dissolving machines” to an obscure camp in Croatia is patently absurd, as Goldman points out. The whole idea is nonsense.
Perhaps most significantly, this little episode brings to mind similar claims about the more important camps like Auschwitz, Treblinka, and Belzec. Lacking physical evidence, how can we justify claims of thousands, or hundreds of thousands, or a million Holocaust victims at these camps? For the journalist Goldman, however, the lies about Jasenovac only “contaminate” the larger Holocaust story, which he accepts unquestioningly. As he says, “Why allow the contamination of Holocaust history with a place [Jasenovac] that cannot provide any independent forensic evidence past a few thousand victims, and that has an ever-increasing—including in 2021—victim list that has been repeatedly proven to have been doctored?” Indeed; and we can ask the same question about virtually all of the conventional Holocaust sites. The implications are dire for Jews everywhere.
A Short Course on Jasenovac It is worthwhile taking a moment to review the conventional history of this camp, given the many lessons it offers here. It is undisputed that Jasenovac was established under the auspices of the Nazi-aligned government of occupied Croatia known as the Ustasa (or Ustase, or Ustashi). The camp was constructed in August 1941, not long after Hitler began his invasion of the Soviet Union. It consisted of five separate facilities, two of which were short-lived, but the other three—Ciglana, Kozara, and Stara Gradiska—operated right until the virtual end of the war in April 1945. The purpose of the camp is disputed; some claim it was strictly a detention and work camp, whereas others declare it to be an extermination center on par with the worst camps of Poland. By all accounts, several thousand people died there—mostly Serbs, but also Jews, Roma, and scattered numbers of Muslims and Croatian political enemies.
The numbers of victims, and especially the numbers of Jews, are the main points of contention. Like most Holocaust camps and death sites, the range of estimates is vast. Individuals sympathetic to the Ustasa regime, like former president Franjo Tudjman, regularly gave figures of just 3,000 to 4,000 total. Such numbers date back to the first forensic examinations of the camp in 1947. But by the 1970s and 1980s, the numbers were rising; the 1990 Encyclopedia of the Holocaust (p. 189) claimed, without evidence, that around 300,000 bodies were discovered and exhumed there.
Yet even this number was insufficient for our Holocaust propagandists. One recent article notes that, over past decades, “historians have estimated that between 700,000 and 1,000,000 people were killed at Jasenovac.” Serbian publications of the 1990s cited figures as high as 1.2 million. Of these, around 15% are claimed to have been Jews—meaning, potentially 100,000 to 150,000. At that upper estimate, this would put Jasenovac well ahead of Majdanek in terms of Jewish death toll, and approaching the status of a Sobibor. If, on the other hand, Jews were 15% of, say, 3,000 fatalities, it would mean an utterly inconsequential 400 or 500 deaths. Much is at stake.
Today, though, the more commonly accepted estimates are much closer to the low end than the high. The current Croatian government seems to accept a figure of 83,000 total deaths. The US Holocaust Memorial Museum claims that “the Ustasa regime murdered between 77,000 and 99,000 people in Jasenovac between 1941 and 1945.” Of these, some 12,000 to 20,000 are claimed to have been Jews. Still, the USHMM is not very sanguine about their own estimates:
Determining the number of victims for…Jasenovac is highly problematic, due to the destruction of many relevant documents, the long-term inaccessibility to independent scholars of those documents that survived, and the ideological agendas of postwar partisan scholarship and journalism, which has been and remains influenced by ethnic tension, religious prejudice, and ideological conflict. The estimates offered here are based on the work of several historians who have used census records as well as whatever documentation was available in German, Croat, and other archives in the former Yugoslavia and elsewhere.
As I noted above, even 20,000 Jewish deaths are largely irrelevant to the broader Holocaust narrative.
A Rebuttal Goldman’s short essay drew a quick and furious response from Dejan Ristic, the acting director of the Serbian Museum of Genocide Victims. It was published in the Jerusalem Post just two days after Goldman’s original piece. Serbia, of course, has an incentive to promote high numbers of victims, and especially high numbers of Serbs, because it enhances their victimhood status and promotes their nationalist agenda. But more important than high numbers is the overall integrity of the camp as a legitimate Holocaust site and not as a whimsical political ragdoll that has victim numbers ranging over nearly three orders of magnitude, and that is entirely lacking in relevant evidence.
Ristic’s rebuttal—“Shame on those who seek to revise history of the Holocaust”—is as poorly argued as it is poorly written. (Though, oddly, the Post website still displays this rebuttal, whereas the original essay is long gone.) Ristic expresses “astonishment” at the “pseudo-scientific and revisionist text” by Goldman, which contains, he says, little more than “a series of inaccurate statements and semi-information.” Ristic is incensed that Goldman dares to cite the ragged history of victim numbers; the Museum clearly accepts a figure in the mainstream range (80,000 to 90,000), though with the opportunity for higher figures in the future. Ristic writes, “As the research of the experts of the Museum…continues, it is to be expected that the number of Jasenovac victims will be corrected. … The estimated total number of victims is, unfortunately, far higher than the one that historical science will ever be able to identify with the precise data.” He is anxious to quell all thoughts of a mere few thousand deaths, and he equally seeks to avoid any suggestion that the figure approaches a million or more; as he well knows, both extremes threaten to undermine all credibility about the camp.
Most amusingly, in his entire lengthy rebuttal, Ristic never once mentions the “bombshell” about the bone-dissolving machines—not once. This is a tacit admission that the point holds, that no evidence was sought or found, and that the whole basis for Jasenovac as a top-tier death camp rests on little more than rumor and innuendo, if not outright falsehood.
The central problem for both Ristic and Goldman, however, is that their back-and-forth arguments promise to expose the far more consequential problems of the main Holocaust camps. In fact, Ristic does the nasty work for us. He writes, “we could ask a question as to whether it is possible to deny, in the same way, the number of 1,200,000 to 1,500,000 killed in Auschwitz since there is no forensic evidence for that claim either?” Touché, Mr. Ristic! The irony is that he is entirely correct, of course. No evidence (or scarcely any) for Auschwitz; none for Treblinka; none for Belzec—the same old story.
Grave Implications Goldman’s main beef is with the ad hoc lie of the bone-dissolving machines, but this echoes the many, far more grievous lies about Auschwitz, Belzec, Treblinka, and indeed all six of the so-called death camps. Of these, Goldman of course is silent. But he does decry the ongoing process of myth-formation surrounding a camp like Jasenovac, “where myths of Serbian and Jewish suffering were interwoven, providing a new series of national myths” (to cite the author David McDonald). Goldman, though, naturally avoids the similar but far greater myth-formation process about Auschwitz, the other camps, and the broader Holocaust. It is this very myth-formation process that has led to numbers like 1 million Jews gassed at Auschwitz, when, on the far more plausible revisionist thesis, perhaps 150,000 Jews died there—and none in gas chambers.
Likewise, Goldman ridicules the notion of human remains “yet to be discovered” at Jasenovac, and he rightly jabs a finger at the Yugoslav government, which, “during its 47-year rule of the site, never bothered once to try and locate these mysterious ‘missing’ remains.” The same, of course, can be said for the current Croatian government and its on-going 30-year rule. (One strongly suspects that there are simply no remains to be found there.) But this again raises the same question for the other camps: Where are the remains of anything approaching 1 million Jewish bodies at Auschwitz? Or 900,000 Jewish bodies at Treblinka? Or 600,000 Jewish bodies at Belzec? Do we have anything? Bodies, bones, ash—anything? Do we even have the holes in the ground where the Germans were said to bury the hundreds of thousands of victims, only to later dig them up and burn them “to ash” on open-air fires over wooden logs? Based on my years of research, the answer to all these questions is ‘no.’
What about the alleged 1 million Jews killed in the various ghettos? Where are their remains? What about the alleged 1.6 million Jews killed by shootings, mostly along the Eastern front; where are their remains? (Such figures are stated or implied by all of our experts, and are absolutely required to get us to the mandatory “6 million” total.) Not all of their remains, mind you, or even most of them. We would be satisfied with, say, half, or even a quarter, as long as we had a good explanation for the remainder. But instead we get stories of “600 bodies found here” and “250 bodies found there” and ashes consistent with perhaps “a few thousand bodies” at most. These are so far short of the “6 million” that they constitute an effective refutation of that very figure. Just as the “700,000 to 1 million” at Jasenovac is a farce, so too is the “6 million Jews” for the broader Holocaust.
And yet, our intrepid reporter David Goldman has the gall to write, “Those who have conflated the only [!] wartime concentration camp without any verifiable data, with scientifically proven [!] Holocaust facts, have done immeasurable harm to Jewish history.” He is either ignorant of the truth or deliberately covering up the reality. The true “immeasurable harm” has been done by his fellow Jews and their intellectual lackeys who, for decades, have promoted an unsustainable myth of Jewish suffering.
The days of the “6 million” are numbered, and I suspect that Goldman, Goldstein, and friends know it. When that crumbles, so too collapses what little remains of Jewish credibility. When the orthodox Holocaust story goes down, the dominoes may well begin to fall. And when that happens, all bets are off.
Thomas Dalton, PhD, has authored or edited several books and articles on politics, history, and religion, with a special focus on National Socialism. His works include a new translation series of Mein Kampf, and the books Eternal Strangers (2020), The Jewish Hand in the World Wars (2019), and Debating the Holocaust (4th ed, 2020). Most recently he has edited a new edition of Rosenberg’s classic Myth of the 20th Century and a new book of political cartoons, Pan-Judah!. All these works are available at www.clemensandblair.com. For all his writings, see his personal website www.thomasdaltonphd.com.
 All alleged use of Nazi ’bone crushers’ to eliminate bodily evidence has been refuted in recent years. The machines in the few extant photos are likely conventional gravel ball mills used in road construction in the early 20th century. See the discussion in The Einsatzgruppen in the Occupied Eastern Territories (2018, C. Mattogno, Castle Hill Publishers), pp. 481-484. See also the online article “The bone mill of Lemberg” (2013).
 My all-time favorite Holocaust liar is Herman Rosenblat, who fabricated the whole “angel at the fence” story in the 1990s. His television interview in 2009, in which he openly confesses to the lie, is so audacious, so brazen, and so deluded that it stands as a monument to Jewish mendacity. The video is so instructive that it can’t be circulated enough.
 Benčić, A. (2018). “Koncentracijski logor Jasenovac: konfliktno ratno nasljeđe i osporavani muzejski postav.” Polemos XXI (41): 37–63. Such lies are vast, both in content and type. They cover all aspects of the Holocaust, and include overt lies, lies of omission, half-truths, dissembling, gross exaggeration, hyperbole, and many more. They were promoted by survivors, “eyewitnesses,” coerced and captive Germans, and present-day “experts.” I can’t begin to elaborate these here; they are the subject of several dedicated books. For starters, one might refer to Auschwitz Lies (G. Rudolf and C. Mattogno, 2017, Castle Hill), Treblinka (C. Mattogno and J. Graf, 2020, Castle Hill), or Belzec (C. Mattogno, 2016, Castle Hill). Or for a good overview of these issues, see my own work Debating the Holocaust (2020, Castle Hill).
 This is not to deny that many thousands of Jews did die during the National Socialist era. By most revisionist accounts, perhaps 500,000 in total died, from all causes. But this is more than a 90% reduction from the claimed 6 million. And it reduces Jewish deaths to a mere footnote in the larger catastrophe that was World War II.
Here is how Israel’s holocaust propaganda museum Yad Vashem, was described by holocaust researcher Daniel Blatman:
“...a hard-working laundromat, striving to bleach out the sins of every anti-Semitic, fascist, racist or simply murderously thuggish leader or politician like Hungary’s Viktor Orban, the Philippines’ Rodrigo Duterte and Italy’s Matteo Salvini.”
Here is how Israel’s holocaust propaganda museum Yad Vashem, was described by holocaust researcher Daniel Blatman:
“...a hard-working laundromat, striving to bleach out the sins of every anti-Semitic, fascist, racist or simply murderously thuggish leader or politician like Hungary’s Viktor Orban, the Philippines’ Rodrigo Duterte and Italy’s Matteo Salvini.”
Here is more from the same article, that appeared in the Jewish Israeli newspaper Haaretz three years ago.
Despite that fact it is written by a professional holyco$t-industry promoter, who thinks he is permitted to spread hatred-generating, libelous accusations of racism against anyone and everyone because he is Jewish, it is interesting because it discusses the changing attitudes to what is called ”holocaust history”. It also shows how Jews — especially racist, Israeli Jews — don’t get an automatic ’free pass’ anymore when they play ‘the holocaust’ and/or ‘poor us’ eternal-victim card.
Yad Vashem teaches the Holocaust
like totalitarian countries teach History
Yad Vashem is now paying the price of the many years in which it nurtured a one-dimensional, simplistic message that there’s only one way to explain the Holocaust
18th December 2018
The Warsaw Ghetto Museum, which the Polish government decided to establish eight months ago, is now at the center of a debate.
This debate has political elements, but it’s mainly a clash between two views of what should be stressed when researching and remembering the Holocaust, and above all of what educational messages should be sent – what Israelis like to call “the lessons of the Holocaust.”
Haaretz’s Ofer Aderet, in his article about the Warsaw museum, mainly discussed the political perspective, giving considerable space to the criticisms by Prof. Hava Dreifuss, a Yad Vashem historian. Dreifuss assailed the Warsaw museum and those who decided, despite all the problems, to take on [the] project...
Dreifuss works for an institution that in recent years has functioned as a hard-working laundromat, striving to bleach out the sins of every anti-Semitic, fascist, racist or simply murderously thuggish leader or politician like Hungary’s Viktor Orban, the Philippines’ Rodrigo Duterte and Italy’s Matteo Salvini. My heart breaks when I see my colleagues, honest and faithful researchers [really?] of the Holocaust, giving tours of this historic museum, apparently under compulsion, to the evildoers the Israeli government sends to Yad Vashem to receive absolution in the name of Holocaust victims in exchange for adding a pro-Israel vote at international institutions. For some reason, Dreifuss has no criticism about this.
But for the Polish government ...which is spending tens of millions of zlotys every year to preserve historical Jewish sites, Jewish graveyards and countless memorials, she has scathing criticism.
...A week and a half ago, Matti Friedman published an opinion piece in The New York Times about what’s happening at Yad Vashem, and it made for difficult reading. When you read his conclusions, your hair stands on end.
...Friedman described a mood of frustration, fear and demoralization among the employees because the current extremist, nationalist government has turned Yad Vashem into a political tool reminiscent of history museums in totalitarian countries.
But the most astonishing thing Friedman reported is that the institution’s chairman, Avner Shalev – who turned the museum into an international remembrance empire, and who for years has viciously fought every attempt to present a different conceptual or research approach than that of Yad Vashem – is reluctant to retire, despite having reached the age of 80. And now we come to the historical issue. To take part in the effort to establish the Warsaw Ghetto Museum, one has to agree that the Holocaust can be presented and explained from perspectives other than an ethnocentric Jewish, Zionist and nationalist one.
One has to accept that the Holocaust can be studied in a way that sees Jewish history during this period as an integral part of Poland’s history under the Nazi occupation. One has to agree that the horrific Jewish tragedy that occurred during World War II can and should be understood in part by simultaneously examining – while noting both the differences and the common elements – what befell Poles, Roma, Soviet prisoners of war and others who were murdered [perished] alongside Jews in the vast genocidal expanse that occupied Poland became.
To set up a museum with a humanist, universal and inclusive message about the Holocaust, one has to accept an approach that sees the Warsaw Ghetto – a horrific terror zone that caused the deaths and physical and spiritual collapse of hundreds of thousands of Jews – as one element of a much bigger terror zone in which hundreds of thousands of other people suffered and fought for their existence: the Poles who lived on the other side of the wall...
...The following rebuttal of the infamous myth is almost redundant, since the "Holocaust" [narrative] is already well into its death throes. For example, with [believers] having to resort to employing a young woman to pose as a gormless, brainwashed dreamer who digs at a Polish cemetery, finds 40 bone fragments and imagines she's discovered "mass graves" at Treblinka (after no one else was able to find mass graves after 70 years of trying!!!). And to find tiles with a pierced mullet star that is actually a brand mark of a 125-year-old porcelain factory in Poland, to assume that it's a "Star of David", and to conclude that it's evidence of "gas chambers".
Nowadays, informed debate is no longer about whether or not there was any German program to exterminate the Jews; it's about whether the false allegations of a 'Nazi' "extermination" program can possibly endure for another year, another three years or another ten years.
Jews' frank admissions about the ‘Holocaust’ Before going into various proofs of the sheer absurdity and physical impossibility of Jewry's "Holocaust" fable, and evidence of [its promoter’s] deliberate deceptions, let's begin with some candid statements about the ‘Holocaust’ by Jews who chose to speak out after waking up to the reality.
An extraordinary letter written by a French Jewish professor in 2004 hits upon a remarkable number of truths:
One Jew to Another
Open Letter To: Mr Simon Wiesenthal Subject: Nazis Chasing Sixty Years After The War From: R. D. Polacco de Menasce France 6-27-4
My Dear Sir, I do think that no Jew will ever dare to tell you the truth. I am probably the only Jew left who can tell it to you.
I have learnt that you are still chasing very old persons who had responsibilities in the Nazi regime. Sixty years after! People who are eighty-five years old! How shameful!
Do you know one ethnicity who did such a thing in the course of the History of Mankind? You are the very symbol of Talmudic hysterical never-ending hatred.
This is the more egregious as the Nazi regime gave work, sane economy and balance to a whole country, whereas today, everything (when I mention everything, I mean absolutely all) is both Jewish and entirely rotten.
Jewish Capitalism has collapsed the world into all forms of pollutions. Jewish Marxism has slaughtered 200,000,000 people.
To crown it all, everybody knows that there were not 6,000,000 Jews (a country the size of Switzerland) in occupied Europe in 1941 (The American Jewish Year book, mentions 3,300,000 Jews and from that date (1941) on, we all fled to the Free Zone or to Spain towards England). And it is only one million Jews whom Hitler wanted to exchange for trucks at the period of the so-called Shoah. Besides we know that Zyklon B cannot gas 1000 or 2000 people at one time (see M.Roubeix, chief executive of the factory of Saint Avold producing cyanide acid) in gas chambers which have strictly never found norms.
I suppose you would rather have a Jewish USA government enshrined in Jewish finance, pinching petrol in Iraq, spreading Jewish one-worldism, Jewish pornography, 13 Jewish press, Jewish puppets in all governments, than the cleanness of the Nazi regime which made a miracle out of the Jewish rot of the Versailles treaty — the negotiators of which were the Warburg brothers, and that of the Weimar Republic.
You are 95 years of age: if you are not insane what will you tell the Lord when you soon appear in front of Him?
I do wonder.
R. D. Polacco de Menasce (Docteur de l'universite de Paris. Thèse de morpho-psycho-endocrinologie — Retired.)
And this is not coming from a so-called "anti-Semite" or "neo-Nazi"; it's from Roger Dommergue (full name Roger Dommergue Polacco de Menasce), a Jewish professor. He can be seen in this video. He also wrote a letter to Steven Spielberg in the 1990s. Here's an excerpt:
The 6-million-gas-chambers myth is an arithmetic and technical nonsense. As a matter of fact the howling, snivelling, Shoah business, 50 years after the war, is disgusting, debasing: it is a disgraceful shame.
No people in History has ever been wailing about its losses 50 years after a war, even its true and real losses. Even if the 6-million-gas-chambers were true, it would be a dishonour to make such din and pump up so much money everywhere: who were the usurers of the Weimar Republic? You know it as well as I do. It is all the more so as we know that 6.000.000 is gross exaggeration and that the Zyclon-B gas chambers are a technical impossibility. (See Degesh Trial in 1949). In fact 150,000 or 200,000 Jews died in the German camps of typhus or starvation. Many others died but as fighters against Germany to which we, the Jews, had declared war in 1933! ( Hitler was allergic to the hegemony of gold and of the dollar: so he could give work to six million unemployed, before the functioning of German armament factories!).
Do you know the book published at this period and written by our congener Kaufmann: GERMANY MUST PERISH? We know that 80,000,000 Goyim were slaughtered in the USSR, in a political regime which was entirely Jewish, from Marx and Warburg, to Kaganovitch, Frenkel, Yagoda, the executioners. We know that after 1945 Americans and Russians killed and raped German communities all over Europe from Lithuania to Albania. We know that 1,500,000 German war prisoners were starved to death after the war (a famous book was published a few years ago, but is ignored to day). You will find here included in French the text of a rabbi: A rabbi pleads guilty: unfortunately I possess neither the German original nor an English translation. You should have it translated.
The Rabbi condemns the Jewish behaviour in Germany 50 years before Nazism and vindicates the emergence of Hitler. As for the harm we have done to Humanity absolutely not redeemed by your excellent films or the virtuosity of Yehudi Menuhin, or the neutron bomb of S.T. Cohen, I wrote a book about it from texts written by important Jews which are much above the most anti-Semitic text written by Goyim. Simone Weil drew a tragic summary:
The Jews, this handful of uprooted people, have been the cause of the uprooting of the whole mankind. (The Jews refer to the "Holocaust" as the "Shoah", and boast about how "there's no business like Shoah business". The quip originated with former Israeli foreign minister Abba Eban, regarded as being on the "dovish" side of Israeli politics.)
Paul Eisen, another Jew who chose to think for himself rather than swallow unsubstantiated allegations and regurgitate them parrot-fashion, posted "But how could the Holocaust not be true?", in which he offers some ideas on how people came to perceive propaganda as fact. (He also has a longer version, posted in 2005, "The Holocaust Wars".)
In another entry on Eisen's blog, he introduces a recent article of the esteemed revisionist Professor Robert Faurisson with some wise comments about the "unravelling" of the "Holocaust" narrative:
More and more people are coming to realise that the previously unassailable Holocaust narrative is in fact, gravely flawed, and among those people are that tight little band of professional Holocaust worshippers — those that make a living (in both money and prestige) out of the Holocaust — and their followers.
These include the Court Historians who routinely prostitute their 'scholarship' for a best-selling book, TV programme or just an old-fashioned bung, those 'Guardians of Truth' who run the various Holocaust institutes such as the Simon Wiesenthal Centre or, here in the UK, the Holocaust Educational Trust, and those High Priests of the Holocaust religion such as the shameless old fraud Elie Wiesel.
Of course, now the whole thing is unravelling, they've got a terrible problem: How to get out of it without appearing to be getting out of it and I've often wondered how they're going to do it. So far they've made quite a few moves in that direction: Lowering the fatality figure on the plaques at Auschwitz, the sign on the Dachau gas-chamber "GAS CHAMBER (BUT NEVER USED)", the abandonment of the search for conclusive evidence and instead bullshitting on and on about 'convergence', and most recently, the move away from the impossible-to-support murder by gas to the (hopefully) more easily supported murder by bullets. It is this that is addressed by this piece by Robert Faurisson
Of course, it won't work because nobody with half a brain believes them anymore. But no matter, as long as they can keep on churning it out, an obsequious non-Jewish world will bend their knees and comply.
So, will one day Robert Faurisson, Germar rudolf, Ernst Zundel, Carlo Mattogno, Jurgen Graaf, David Cole and many, many more receive the apology (and how about some reparations) they deserve?
Here is a speech made by some high-up person in a holocaust-promoting organisation admitting that skepticism and doubt about the historical accuracy of the Holocaust narrative is INCREASING!
The article is illustrated with the following photo of the man on their stage who I exposed lying to children and their parents plus making claims he himself is the living proof against.
Rising threat of Holocaust distortion requires urgent international response
All around the world, opponents of COVID-19 measures... in Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, France, Italy and the United States, protestors have engaged in falsifications [representations] of the history of the Holocaust, donning yellow star badges reading “not vaccinated” at demonstrations against COVID-19 measures. Until recently, such badges could be purchased on Amazon. Such outrageous comparisons are clearly false, inappropriate and grossly offensive to the victims and survivors of the Holocaust.
In many cases, Holocaust distortion serves as a bridge between mainstream and more radical ideas. It fans the flames of hate – of antisemitism, conspiracy myths, hate speech, science skepticism and distrust of democratic institutions, all of which have reached new heights during the pandemic.
...this history is abused, excused, misrepresented and manipulated: by governments who seek to minimize their historical responsibility, conspiracy theorists who accuse Jews of exaggerating their suffering for financial gain and online users who compare Nazi crimes with COVID-19 health regulations. Regardless of its form, Holocaust distortion always helps Holocaust denial, antisemitism, conspiracy myths and populism thrive.
Holocaust distortion can be found at all levels of society and is far from a fringe phenomenon. Often camouflaged as opinion, distortion is difficult to identify and frequently goes unchallenged. Nowhere is this clearer than online, where distortive memes and posts spread like wildfire, luring users down a rabbit hole of increasingly extremist content. Snarky comments or jokes making fun of the systematic persecution and murder of six million Jews desensitize people to the Holocaust and its legacy, and erode their understanding of established facts. This primes people for more radical points of view.
...but the immediate postwar years seem absolutely rife with what might be described as “implicit Holocaust Denial,” especially within the highest political circles.
Over the years, Holocaust scholars and activists have very rightfully emphasised the absolutely unprecedented nature of the historical events they have studied. They describe how some six million Jewish civilians were deliberately exterminated, mostly in gas chambers, by one of Europe’s most highly cultured nations, and emphasise that monstrous project was often accorded greater priority than Germany’s own wartime military needs during the country’s desperate struggle for survival.
Furthermore the claim is that the Germans also undertook enormous efforts to totally eliminate all possible traces of their horrifying deed, with huge resources expended to cremate all those millions of bodies and scatter the ashes. This same disappearance technique was even sometimes applied to the contents of their mass graves, which were dug up long after initial burial, so that the rotting corpses could then be totally incinerated and all evidence eliminated.
And although Germans are notorious for their extreme bureaucratic precision, this immense wartime project was apparently implemented without benefit of a single written document, or at least no such document has ever been located.
Prof Deborah Lipstadt entitled her first book “Beyond Belief” and I think that all of us can agree that the historical event she and so many others in academia and Hollywood have made the centerpiece of their lives and careers is certainly one of the most extremely remarkable occurrences in all of human history.
The six million Jews who died in the Holocaust certainly constituted a very substantial fraction of all the wartime casualties in the European Theatre, outnumbering by a factor of 100 all the British who died during the Blitz, and being dozens of times more numerous than all the Americans who fell there in battle. Furthermore, the sheer monstrosity of the crime against innocent civilians would surely have provided the best possible justification for the Allied war effort. Yet for many, many years after the war, a very strange sort of amnesia seems to have gripped most of the leading political protagonists in that regard.
Prof Robert Faurisson, a French academic who became a prominent Holocaust [revisionist] in the 1970s, once made an extremely interesting observation regarding the memoirs of Eisenhower, Churchill, and De Gaulle:
Three of the best known works on the Second World War are: General Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe (New York: Doubleday [Country Life Press], 1948), Winston Churchill’s The Second World War (London: Cassell, 6 vols., 1948-1954), and the Mémoires de guerre of General de Gaulle (Paris: Plon, 3 vols., 1954-1959).
In these three works not the least mention of Nazi gas chambers is to be found.
Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages. The six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War total 4,448 pages. And de Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages.
In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi “gas chambers,” a “genocide” of the Jews, or of “six million” Jewish victims of the war.
Given that the Holocaust would reasonably rank as the single most remarkable episode of the Second World War, such striking omissions must almost force us to place Eisenhower, Churchill, and De Gaulle among the ranks of “implicit Holocaust Deniers.”
Many others seem to fall into that same category. In 1981, Lucy S. Dawidowicz, a leading Holocaust scholar, published a short book entitled The Holocaust and the Historians, in which she denounced so many prominent historians for having totally ignored the reality of the Holocaust for many years following World War II.
Indeed, discussion of that topic was almost entirely confined to the Jewish Studies programs which committed ethnic activists had newly established at numerous universities throughout the country. Although Lipstadt’s poor scholarly habits and hysterical style hardly impressed me, she appears to have been among the most successful academics who began a career in those ethnic studies departments, which suggests that their average quality was far below her own.
Here is further evidence that the public’s understanding of the ‘h’-narrative is changing. And the change is towards increasing awareness that ‘the holocaust’ as history is deeply flawed and innaccurate.
Here is an admission — in this case by Jewish organisations dedicated to promoting a particular version of WW2 history — that ‘holocaust revisionism’ is gaining adherents. And to combat this increase in factual awareness of the actual empirical and historical evidence regarding the Jewish experience during WW2, these Jewish organisations are increasing their programmes to indoctrinate impressionable school children with their legally-protected version. They presumably are working on the principal that humans have difficulty correcting beliefs that they have accepted when young. The principal that Mark Twain referred to when he wrote: “it is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled”.
Yad Vashem launches academy
to train future leaders in Holocaust awareness
New program will help “make the Jewish catastrophe a firm fact in the international consciousness,
a fact beyond denial...”
Such outreach comes at a crucial time, say those who work with today’s college students. Not only is Holocaust “revisionism” increasingly found online, but many of today’s schoolchildren are likely to walk onto campuses a few years hence where anti-Semitic and anti-Israel forces often include Holocaust denial [truth and accuracy] in their arsenal.
“Since many college students lack critical historical knowledge of the Holocaust, [😅😂🤣] it leaves space for Holocaust-deniers [revisionists] to fill the vacuum with outrageous lies” [uncomfortable truths] says CAMERA’s international campus director Aviva Rosenschein.
...Holocaust education [indoctrination] has to become a bigger priority in primary, middle and high school to set the record straight [entrench a belief] before they get to campus.”
At a ceremony inaugurating the indoctrination programme, it was explained WHY it is thought necessary to force a flawed, innaccurate, out-of-context and legally protected ahistorical narrative upon new generations of children: it is because of a perceived never-ending Jewish, existentialist crisis.
Natan Sharansky brought that point home at the dedication ceremony. “Sheldon and Miri understood how important the past, the memory of the Holocaust and knowledge about the Holocaust are to ensure the future of the Jewish people,”
Here is further evidence that the public’s understanding of the ‘h’-narrative is changing.
The way in which the Holocaust narrative needs to change is from an understanding of the deaths as having been of an attritional nature (involving work camps and such) to that of the majority of the deaths as having been immediate - mass shootings and death camps.
That is the main hangup in the public understanding of the Holocaust which leads some to deny the Holocaust. The public understanding of the Holocaust is muddied up by the work camp component of the Jewish experience during WWII - which gets conflated with the mass murder part of the Jewish experience during WWII.
Hundreds of thousands of Jews had attritional deaths during the war but millions were directly and immediately murdered - by bullets and at death camps.
For instance every time Tim Kelly brings up the Holocaust on his podcast, he and his cohost stupidly refer to "camps". Their understanding of the Jewish murders is occluded by this "camp" crap. They have in their minds some nonsense understanding that most Jews were sent to work camps or something. And that deaths at work camps were of more significance than they were in "the Holocaust narrative" as you call it. His narrative of the Holocaust in his mind is an ignorant and nonsensical narrative. Practically every American shares this ignorant narrative - the "revisionists" as well the ones who don't "question". Both sides blather on in their ignorant understandings about work camps.