Post by Nessie on Aug 8, 2023 14:13:36 GMT

They further corroborate the observations of myself and the participants at CODOH.
I leave it to the sagacity of the fair-minded reader to ascertain what is occurring and why so many people have reached similar conclusions about Nessieโs online antics:
You have not read much of anything, and you do not understand the arguments of either side.
You โspecializeโ in being obnoxious. You think you are winning over at CODOH? Actually everyone is laughing at you, and you are universally regarded as by far the dumbest of the three holohoaxers currently posting there.
I remember one time you mentioned the rather telling fact that you got banned on a non-Holocaust forum, something with your audio cable obsession. This suggests to me that you have a generally defective personality.
skepticforum.mu.nu/viewtopic.php?p=925556&sid=52fc4b964ff15738cdddd748dfbb4c47#p925556
You โspecializeโ in being obnoxious. You think you are winning over at CODOH? Actually everyone is laughing at you, and you are universally regarded as by far the dumbest of the three holohoaxers currently posting there.
I remember one time you mentioned the rather telling fact that you got banned on a non-Holocaust forum, something with your audio cable obsession. This suggests to me that you have a generally defective personality.
skepticforum.mu.nu/viewtopic.php?p=925556&sid=52fc4b964ff15738cdddd748dfbb4c47#p925556
Notice that [Nessie] makes the same insipid comments regardless of the thread topic. He does it as bait to get people to argue with him. That's why nobody likes him.
Save your breath, Nessie. I had a long exchange with you on Nessie's board which confirmed that you are not worth talking to.
skepticforum.mu.nu/viewtopic.php?p=925539&sid=52fc4b964ff15738cdddd748dfbb4c47#p925539
Save your breath, Nessie. I had a long exchange with you on Nessie's board which confirmed that you are not worth talking to.
skepticforum.mu.nu/viewtopic.php?p=925539&sid=52fc4b964ff15738cdddd748dfbb4c47#p925539
This is the problem with the majority of Nessie's "logic". He's too thick to realize that it is he who doesn't understand the matters he discusses.
skepticforum.mu.nu/viewtopic.php?p=924726&sid=52fc4b964ff15738cdddd748dfbb4c47#p924726
skepticforum.mu.nu/viewtopic.php?p=924726&sid=52fc4b964ff15738cdddd748dfbb4c47#p924726
You have linked to two quotes by Gibson and one by blake121666, which, like so many of your replies to me, resort to abuse.
Taken together these โeye-witnessโ testimonies โ from an Exterminationist perspective โ โconvergeโ and โcorroborateโ each other and should therefore be regarded as irrefutable evidence. ๐๐
Correct, Gibson and blake12166 converge and corroborate with you, to prove that my argument revisionists are at their weakest, when their arguments and methodology are challenged. Instead of debating them in their comfort zone, take them out of that zone and point out their claims are logically fallacies and that they cannot evidence what did happen. By doing that, they get annoyed and frustrated, and so they resort to abuse.