𝝥𝝰𝘇𝗴𝝻𝝸
🕵️
𝕲𝖊𝖍𝖊𝖎𝖒𝖕𝖔𝖑𝖎𝖟𝖊𝖎
Posts: 1,457 
|
Post by 𝝥𝝰𝘇𝗴𝝻𝝸 on Aug 6, 2023 0:01:15 GMT
when deniers claim there are either no mass graves, or insufficient remains at the AR camps to account for hundreds of thousands of cremated bodies, they need to present evidence from GPR, bore hole samples, excavations or other archaeological surveys, to prove that claim. They can only assert millions did not die by gassing and were still alive at the end of 1944. Please forget about the pejorative "denier". What is important are the conclusions reasonably intelligent people without bias reach after examination of the evidence. Extraordinary claims such as mass murder purported in the alleged holocaust require extraordinary evidence; this is where the dilemma for exterminationists lie. All that is presented are allegories, adminicles and eye witness testimony from some dubious characters. If there was hard evidence it is certain that boreholes, excavations would be made to throw the detritus in the face of the deniers. The fact that transports to a final destination (e.g. Treblinka) stopped for lengthy periods at Jewish Labour Camps and railway junctions to other Jewish labour camps is totally ignored by the exterminationists; those camps were in the thousands and heavily manned with Jews. They do not fit in with the image people have of konzentrationslager. The poster Nessie has little interest in the reality of Zwangarbeitslager für Juden administered by the labour department of the Reich, which by many accounts was uneventful and kept Jews safe from the reality of the war. There is a focus on SS camps only and these were the minority. Some labour camps were in churches or school halls with minimal security. Most of the Sobibor eye witnesses went to a good number of Jewish Labour camps, but a huge number also ended up in places like Birkenau and survived. No doubt they were put to work in one of the many labour camps in the area. The objection to the transports stopping at Labour Camps is the lack of specific information. Die Fahrplananordnung (transport schedules) are generalized and a person ending up at say Skarzysko Kamm munitions factory would not know they were transported under the auspices of Die Fahrplananordnung Nr 587. In fact the transports are barely mentioned just the conditions within the munitions factory. Yet these factories and labour camps were manned by thousands and thousands of Jews all over the Reich. Most arrived at Labour camps by rail transports. Despite a map given of the westward trend of the Jewish Labour Camps the inability to read basic German resulted in the erroneous conclusion the map referred to an earlier date, despite it being mentioned of the boundaries of earlier times to avoid confusion and to give correct spatial orientation. The hundred of Jewish Labour Camps in Österreich specifically for Hungarian Jews up to wars end is simply dismissed. A real historian or anyone interested in history would find out as much as they can about these fascinating places; the reality is given in some information provided by Jews such as Peter Lantos who experienced such a camp. The exterminationist perspective are such claims as the Ciechanow Jews being exterminated at Treblinka when the reality is the Reich sent 80 thousand of them over the border to Russian territory. Those who remained behind were sent to Birkenau with survivors. It is Nessie that is delusional. Comments such as the following show the delusions. Here he is criticizing the intellect of his opponents while ignoring his own glaring deficiencies. The people he is criticizing have greater intellect and education than Nessie will ever have. If he is dissing others then he should not get upset when other become a little ad hominem with he. Nessie continues This is the argument that got Nessie in the pickle at CODOH. While that may be a true statement it adds nothing to any topic. It was the same manner of posting here in the old forum that also got Nessie into difficulty with the moderator Depth Check and put in the sin bin for a while. (Months actually). |
|
Nessie
✍️
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Aug 6, 2023 7:33:50 GMT
Nessie is a mythical beast that is and can be correctly referred to as he, she or it. I chose which one applies to me, not you. Actually, no you don’t choose. You only choose whether to be in denial of reality and to censor people who expose this to you and to the RODOH board. You also DO NOT get to choose whether the name is the diminitive of the female names Agnes and Vanessa. It IS. And only someone in denial would refuse to acknowledge this. Each person can choose what pronouns they consider appropriate and only a person with a tyranncal, delusional mindset would deny this obvious reality. Actually I do get to chose my preferred pronoun, just as someone called Chris, which could be Christine or Christopher, or Charlie, which could be Charlene or Charles, gets to chose which pronoun they prefer. Then there are names such as Lindsay, with variations in spelling, which are used by both male and females. There are lots of examples of names that cross over between sexes. I have chosen Nessie and the avatar of the Loch Ness monster, as an ironic comment on hoaxes. The Loch Ness monster can be a he, or a she, or an it. It is perfectly reasonable for me to chose which pronoun is to be used to refer to me. Your claim it is tyrannical is extreme and nonsense. That you refer to me as she when I asked you to call me he, and your commentary on my qualifications, is you trying to dox me, by bullying me into proving who I am and my qualifications. You have a history of bullying others, with your constant suggestions about the mental health of those who disagree with you. Your disrespect for everyone on this forum, as you have ignored requests from moderators to stop, is further evidence of the bully you are. |
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Aug 6, 2023 12:04:10 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by blake121666 on Aug 6, 2023 13:17:18 GMT
The "Nessie" he is using is derived from the creature in the Loch Ness - which was not named after any female - but even if it were it is not particularly thought of being female. He has told you that. Nessie is most likely male and would prefer to be referred to that way. Quit being a jerk about this. A shapeshifting lizard person such as Nessie should be able to be referred to as he wishes! BTW, the squirrel in my avatar could very well be flashing the supergirl symbol rather than a superman symbol!  |
|
Nessie
✍️
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Aug 6, 2023 16:25:50 GMT
Actually I do get to chose my preferred pronoun... Yes, of course you do. Of course! That is not what I explained. 🤦♂️You are not understanding the simple reality that I am AGAIN trying to explain to you. You don’t get to choose whether other people use it or not. You don’t get to choose whether other people believe you are male or are really female posing as male. That you think you can choose for them, is what I regard as mildly ”tyrannical” behaviour. Can you understand that? You are the only person who thinks it is acceptable to refer to someone by a pronoun they do not want. Everyone else here is asking you to be more respectful. It is tyrannical of you to refuse to use the pronoun I have requested. It is normal behaviour to ask another to use a preferred pronoun. For you to suggest it is in any way unreasonable for someone to ask to be addressed by their preferred pronoun, is utter nonsense. I am not an Agnes or Vanessa or female. I don't post on female related topics, pursue a female agenda or do anything to make people think I am female, which is why I have always been referred to as male and male pronouns I have never objected to. You are the only exception to that, and you only started to recently call me she. You are clearly at it, trying a new way to bully me.
Look at my avatar, it is the most famous picture of the Loch Ness Monster. I have clearly identified with that and have posted elsewhere, acting as Nessie in Loch Ness monster related topics. I have not. I have chosen the name of a mythical beast, that has no set pronoun. Look at my avatar, the one I have used here and on other forums I post on as Nessie. The only exception was CODOH, because I could not get it to upload, probably due to all the restrictions imposed. Yes it is, as at the moment the only way I can prove to you, that you are wrong and force you to use the correct pronoun and accept my degree, would be to post personal details. It is not my problem, you struggle with my points about logic. You have bullied everyone who I have seen disagree with you, by constantly undermining and questioning their sanity, rationality and intelligence. You do that directly, or by suggesting they argue like a fool. You constantly act in a condescending manner, sheesh, eye rolling, speaking to people as if they are children. It is your MO. You do it here, you did it on TSSF.
I have not used a nickname derived from a female name, I have used the name of a mythical beast, with no set gender. The avatar I have used since I first started as Nessie, the topics I post on and my acceptance of being referred to as he from the start, proves that. You are the only person who has objected to the term denier, and I respected your request to stop using that term for you. Others, who do not object to the term, get to chose what term I use and since they accept denier, I use it. If someone else asks to not be called a denier, I will do that. Unlike you, I respect what people ask to be referred to.
When someone posts something anti-Semitic, then it is reasonable to point out they have been anti-Semitic. I am trying to get you to try and understand why you should not refuse to use a preferred pronoun, as it is like other unacceptable behaviour, such as doxing or me refusing to respect your request not to use the term denier about you. Despite your refusal to respect my request to use the male pronoun, I have still not resorted to calling you a denier or referring to you by your actual name, which you previously revealed on TSSF.
|
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Aug 6, 2023 18:43:37 GMT
... concentrate now... Vanessa and Agnes do NOT fit in that category. Can you finally acknowledge that? Or do you choose to be in denial of that fact? I am not an Agnes or Vanessa... I have not. I have chosen the name of a mythical beast... [ Oh boy. 🤦♂️] Which just happens to be the dimunitive of the two FEMALE names I mentioned. A fact that you are in denial of and refuse to acknowledge. Demonstrating yet again that ironcally it is you yourself who most deserve the epithet of ’denier’. You also just refused to concede that those two names are not names used for both genders. I.e. that is another false argument you used, and then dodged when asked to acknowledge. If you can’t admit such simple, mundane facts as these, no wonder you are regarded as beyond reason on complex, historical WW2 issues. I chall3nged you to provide evidence, i.e. a linked quote. You instead just repeated the false accusation. Which is exactly how you illogcally argue for the anti-German, racist, hate-perpetuating, flawed, exaggerated and refuted WW2 mass-gassing narrative. Which is why you got blocked at CODOH. Which brings as back to what this thread is about, and which you are avoiding. Which is presumably why you dodged by censoring my accurate narration of where you got schooled in the different types of logically fallacious arguments. Plus my accurate observation that you just mindlessly mirror back arguments that have defeated your own. Preserved here. |
|
𝝥𝝰𝘇𝗴𝝻𝝸
🕵️
𝕲𝖊𝖍𝖊𝖎𝖒𝖕𝖔𝖑𝖎𝖟𝖊𝖎
Posts: 1,457
|
Post by 𝝥𝝰𝘇𝗴𝝻𝝸 on Aug 6, 2023 21:10:07 GMT
Nessie's shell game: When asked about evidence, he refuses and says he prefers to talk about "methodology." When asked about methodology, he says his methodology is to follow the evidence. And that "denier" methodology is flawed because it is not based on evidence but solely on denier beliefs and opinions (unlike Nessie's opinions which he pretends aren't opinions.)
Elsewhere, in response to a question about how to evaluate claims, Nessie says: "Evidence. How many times do you need to be told the same thing?" The usual truism. Here are several definitions of the word evidence. Archie
|
|
Nessie
✍️
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Aug 7, 2023 8:25:38 GMT
I am not an Agnes or Vanessa... I have not. I have chosen the name of a mythical beast... [ Oh boy. 🤦♂️] Which just happens to be the dimunitive of the two FEMALE names I mentioned. A fact that you are in denial of and refuse to acknowledge. Demonstrating yet again that ironcally it is you yourself who most deserve the epithet of ’denier’. You also just refused to concede that those two names are not names used for both genders. I.e. that is another false argument you used, and then dodged when asked to acknowledge. If you can’t admit such simple, mundane facts as these, no wonder you are regarded as beyond reason on complex, historical WW2 issues. I recognise that numerous names are used by both sexes, as I gave you examples of Chris, Charlie and Lindsay. I have also said that Nessie as the Loch Ness Monster is identified as he, she and it. Your argument is that I am using Nessie as a diminutive of a female name. But, as usual you have no evidence to back that claim up. I have pointed to the evidence of my avatar, the subjects that I post and do not post on and that everyone else calls me he, which I do not object to. That proves I am using Nessie as short for the Loch Ness Monster, not a female name and that I identify as male. It is normal that the person gets to chose what sex they are referred to and it is insulting for another to refuse to do that and use another pronoun. Your argument that it is acceptable for you to ignore the preferred pronoun is false. If you were to have a name that is used by both males and females, if I chose to ignore your sex and preferred pronoun, that would be very odd and universally recognised to be insulting to you, calling you a she, when you are a he. You know that, but you want to be insulting, it is in your MO. Ironically, my reply to that post, which broke no forum rules, was censored and removed! I censored your post because you broke forum rules. You are the most likely person here to break forum rules, as you concentrate so much on your opponent, rather than their argument, as you laugh at people, constantly criticise others using terms that normally apply to mental health issues and condescend them by acting as if you are a teacher. I got blocked at CODOH because I attacked the arguments revisionists use. I will debate you here, but only when you refer to me as he and you follow the forum rules. Your refusal to be polite and follow the rules, is one reason why this forum is very quiet compared to CODOH and TSSF. No one can be bothered with your abusive behaviour. You got banned from TSSF because of your abuse towards others, as you condescend, ridicule and abuse those you disagree with. Now that even I will no longer tolerate your abusive behaviour and hardly post here, the forum has died. For example, this thread; rodoh.info/thread/180/hoax-work-anyway?page=31The last page is just you posting to yourself. The previous page has 4 other posters. You have killed the forum. No one wants to be bothered with you. |
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Aug 7, 2023 12:27:07 GMT
[ Oh boy. 🤦♂️] Which just happens to be the dimunitive of the two FEMALE names I mentioned. A fact that you are in denial of and refuse to acknowledge. Demonstrating yet again that ironcally it is you yourself who most deserve the epithet of ’denier’. You also just refused to concede that those two names are not names used for both genders. I.e. that is another false argument you used, and then dodged when asked to acknowledge. If you can’t admit such simple, mundane facts as these, no wonder you are regarded as beyond reason on complex, historical WW2 issues. Your argument is that I am using Nessie as a diminutive of a female name. Ha ha ha! [oh boy!] 🤪 No that is NOT my argument. I have merely pointed out that I choose to use the most appropriate pronoun for a name that is regarded as feminine, used by someone who posts disruptive, unintelligent, illogical nonsense anonymously. I really do not expect a mature person to care, if they wish to protect their identity from public knowledge. It would be a good protection of anonymity if there was doubt to which gender they belonged. That is false. I want to have genuine, HONEST, fair discussion of the facts, evidence and details. I don’t want such discussion to be disrupted by unintelligent, dishonest and illogical nonsense being repeated across all topics. And if you would be honest, neither did CODOH. Which is why they first contained you, then when you persisted in your unintelligent, disruptive behaviour blocked you. 🤦♂️🙄 You are in denial. That is NOT why you got blocked there. You just lied by claiming I bully others. Which is why you can produce no evidence of it. You are also lying about that being why I was blocked at Skeptics. Otherwise produce evidence of that. All my posts are still there. I got blocked supposedly for questioning the fairness of a Pyrhho moderator decision. I’d also questioned Pyrhho’s banning of Sandhurst on what I regarded as a false charge. Pyrhho was looking for an excuse to censor genuine debate by banning one of only two people then arguing from the Revisionist side of the argument. In contrast at CODOH you got frequent warnings to change your unintelligent behaviour but chose to ignore them. Neither Sandhurst, Scott or I got any warnings. Here at RODOH you got given your own section of the board plus moderstor status. So we can see who is most censorious and afraid of genuine, open debate. 🙂 This is what YOU are doing, in this very post that I am replying to now. It is what you did when I returned to the RODOH forum after a 4 month break. It is what you did over at CODOH, constantly going on about H-skeptics behaviour rather than the facts. So the psychological projection you are using to avoid dealing with your own modus operandi is immense. That also is not true. Otherwise provide evidence with a linked quote of me ” constantly” doing that against some other person. |
|
Nessie
✍️
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Aug 7, 2023 13:06:49 GMT
Your argument is that I am using Nessie as a diminutive of a female name. Ha ha ha! [oh boy!] 🤪 No that is NOT my argument. I have merely pointed out that I choose to use the most appropriate pronoun for a name that is regarded as feminine, used by someone who posts disruptive, unintelligent, illogical nonsense anonymously. I really do not expect a mature person to care, if they wish to protect their identity from public knowledge. It would be a good protection of anonymity if there was doubt to which gender they belonged. You have just confirmed I am correct, you are treating Nessie as "a name that is regarded as feminine", rather than a name associated with the Loch Ness Monster. You have no evidence I am female and use Nessie as a female name. There is evidence I use Nessie as associated with the Loch Ness Monster, I identify as male and my posting is primarily on male associated topics. You have been asked by me, moderators and even other posters to refer to me as male. I pointed to the fact that revisionists use illogical arguments, rather than evidence, to support their beliefs. For example, they illogically argue all the witnesses to gassing lied and then fail to provide any witness to what did happen. Revisionists hate that pointed out to them. It is why they stay away from TSSF, censor it on RODOH and you abuse me here. You demand links and quotes from me, but fail to provide any to back up your claims. I don't think either of us are prepared to spend time hunting down posts to evidence our claims. It would be more productive for us to start a new debate from scratch, where you address me as he, don't make use of terms usually associated with mental health issues, or constantly question intelligence or honesty. You often appealed to have me removed or restricted here, and your bullying has in part succeeded in doing that. But, it is a hollow victory, as the forum is now a dead forum.
|
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Aug 7, 2023 15:13:03 GMT
Ha ha ha! [oh boy!] 🤪 No that is NOT my argument. I have merely pointed out that I choose to use the most appropriate pronoun for a name that is regarded as feminine, used by someone who posts disruptive, unintelligent, illogical nonsense anonymously. I really do not expect a mature person — if they wish to protect their identity from public knowledge — to care,. As it would be a good protection of anonymity if there was doubt to which gender they belonged. You have just confirmed I am correct, you are treating Nessie as "a name that is regarded as feminine", rather than a name associated with the Loch Ness Monster. No, this reply just further demonstrates that you are delusional and stubbornly refusing to correctly understand the most simple points in order to be contradictory. The reality is that you were and remain incorrect! As I regard the name Nessie as BOTH feminine AND the name of a mythological lake-monster. [ sheesh! 🤦♂️] [ oh boy! 🙄] I have never claimed either. This is my last reply to you on this trivial, personal vendetta you are waging, by relying on accusatory falsehoods. You just made numerous false claims against me. Can you finally admit that: 1.) I do not “constantly criticise others”,2.) I do not “want to be insulting to others” (my alleged M.O.) but want fair, intelligent, honest discussion, 3.) I do not “have a history of bullying others...”. That is a lie, which is why you cannot present evidence of a single case, 4.) you did immediately make a false claim about me censoring you and removing your post, when I returned after a 4 month gap, and then refused to concede that was a misjudgement, when informed of it by Scott. 5.) you DID lie and give a false reason for my banning from Skeptics. 6.) Can you admit that all of the above show ironically that it is you yourself who has been personally attacking me with false accusations instead of concentrating on the actual arguments? Something which you justify because you feel emotionally upset over a triviality (the use of a pronoun). I.e. can you see and admit that you are accusing me of what YOU are doing? 7.) FINALLY, will you TRY to understand and concede that it was your unintelligent and disruptive behaviour that got you banned from CODOH, despite being given numerous opportunities to desist and instead engage in genuine, intelligent, honest debate? |
|
Nessie
✍️
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Aug 7, 2023 17:33:19 GMT
You have just confirmed I am correct, you are treating Nessie as "a name that is regarded as feminine", rather than a name associated with the Loch Ness Monster. No, this reply just further demonstrates that you are delusional and stubbornly refusing to correctly understand the most simple points in order to be contradictory. The reality is that you were and remain incorrect! As I regard the name Nessie as BOTH feminine AND the name of a mythological lake-monster. [ sheesh! 🤦♂️] Only one applies to me, the Loch Ness Monster. You incorrectly applied the other. Where the "others" are people who you disagree with, your MO is to insult, condescend and abuse. Roll eyes. Laughter. Sheesh. Moronic. Troll. Posting as if you are an adult talking to a naughty child. Your style is instantly recognisable. I cannot get to the threads I had in mind on old RODOH, where you attacked others like you attack me here, on the topics such as immigration and Muslims. Here, where few people post, your bullying has been confined to me. On TSSF your abuse of others was tantamount to bullying. I did accept Scott's explanation and that it was not you and my original accusation was wrong. You were banned for being abusive. The he/she was the straw that broke the camel's back, where your abuse and the moderator's failure to act meant it was no longer worthwhile posting here. Once Turnagain had gone, with whom at least I could get a pretty polite and respectful debate, my time was going to be limited. I tried to debate you, but it was useless due to the dreadful way you speak to me. You are notorious for that, hence you are left talking to yourself here. What you and they call genuine debate, is me playing your game of, I present evidence and you confidently wheel out your excuses to disbelieve that evidence. When I stop playing your game and start to challenge the arguments you make to disbelieve the evidence, your confidence wanes. My time on CODOH proves that the best form of attack is to go for the revisionists arguments. The moderators on CODOH wanted me to desist attacking their arguments, I refused and got banned. The evidence for that is in the posts I made. |
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Aug 7, 2023 18:27:36 GMT
No, this reply just further demonstrates that you are delusional and stubbornly refusing to correctly understand the most simple points in order to be contradictory. On TSSF your abuse of others was tantamount to bullying. I did accept Scott's explanation and that it was not you and my original accusation was wrong. You were banned for being abusive. Once Turnagain had gone, with whom at least I could get a pretty polite and respectful debate, my time was going to be limited. I tried to debate you, but it was useless due to the dreadful way you speak to me. You are notorious for that, hence you are left talking to yourself here. ...The moderators on CODOH wanted me to desist attacking their arguments, I refused and got banned. The evidence for that is in the posts I made. Wow! 😮🤪 This reply I think merely cnfirms that you are seriously delusional/dishonest. It also demonstrates YOUR modus operandi: viz. to make numerous, attacking statements which when asked to provide evidence for, you dishonestly dodge and just repeat more vociferously. Or misrepresent/miscomprehend and then answer your misrepresentation/miscomprehension. (strawman). E.g. B-T: present evidence of my alleged history of constantly criticising, abusing and bullying others. NESSIE’S EVIDENCE: “On TSSF your abuse of others was tantamount to bullying.” 🤦♂️ Really? That is your best ‘evidence’? Just your say-so? Wow! The sad irony is that the reality is that I eventually put most people on ignore there, as ALL I received was hateful abuse from them. I only read perhaps three or four people’s replies. Which when I mentioned that as the reason why I didn’t respond to certain people, I suspect was another reason why I was banned. I.e. it was no sport abusing a revisionist if they weren’t aware of it nor reading it. Your lie that it was because I was the one being abusive is further proof you just reverse the reality and arguments in order to be contradictory. Finally, you have stupidly miscomprehended or dishonestly distorted point 4. I never suggested you didn’t “accept Scott’s explanation”. I was asking you to concede the FACT that you “refused to concede that was a misjudgement”. You instead repeated the false accusation and continued the personally abusive attacks by justifying your abusive false accusation with the insult that I was “untrustworthy”. But I’ve explained exactly this (with quotes) to you recently. And as normal you just ignored the factual evidence and persist in your erroneous, hostile belief. Oh yeah, just as you do with the refuted, racist, anti-German, ‘holocaust mass-gassing’ atrocity propaganda. |
|
Nessie
✍️
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Aug 7, 2023 19:10:07 GMT
On TSSF your abuse of others was tantamount to bullying. I did accept Scott's explanation and that it was not you and my original accusation was wrong. You were banned for being abusive. Once Turnagain had gone, with whom at least I could get a pretty polite and respectful debate, my time was going to be limited. I tried to debate you, but it was useless due to the dreadful way you speak to me. You are notorious for that, hence you are left talking to yourself here. ...The moderators on CODOH wanted me to desist attacking their arguments, I refused and got banned. The evidence for that is in the posts I made. Wow! 😮🤪 This reply I think merely cnfirms that you are seriously delusional/dishonest. There you go, attacking me, by claiming I have mental health issues and I am dishonest. You deny bullying, but then you do exactly what I am accusing you of doing. You demand I link and quote at the same time you make accusations with no links or quotes. We both know your behaviour and abuse got you banned on TSSF. It is the same behaviour as you are exhibiting now. I refused to concede to your claims, until Scott confirmed you were not the person who censored my replies. You are labouring the point now. I admitted I was wrong. You post as if I have never done that. Evidence, not propaganda. Your method for refuting that evidence is logically flawed. |
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Aug 8, 2023 11:00:56 GMT
In the unlikely event that someone unfamiliar with Nessie’s contributions to sensible debate should come across this topic thread, here are a few recent comments on another discussion-forum regarding Nessie.
They further corroborate the observations of myself and the participants at CODOH.
I leave it to the sagacity of the fair-minded reader to ascertain what is occurring and why so many people have reached similar conclusions about Nessie’s online antics:
These are just a few that were recent, so easy to find and link to. There are many more like it. Taken together these ‘eye-witness’ testimonies — from an Exterminationist perspective — ‘converge’ and ‘corroborate’ each other and should therefore be regarded as irrefutable evidence. 🙂😁
|
|
