Voice of America's support for the Soviet Katyn Hoax

You said

"Western governments DID go ALONG WITH IT, and did so for MANY DECADES!!!"

You then cherry-pick where one government source, such as V Of A did go along with it and ignore another official source, such as the Congressional Maddison Committee did not. What the public got was an inconsistent message, with some government sources blaming the Soviets and others the Nazis. Yet, somehow, you think it is possible for there to be successful coordination from all government sources, over the mass gassing narrative. That the US could not get its act straight over one massacre, is evidence it could not pull off a much larger hoax.



An unreferenced source from Wikipedia is not good enough to evidence the British government officially agreed with the Soviets during the Cold War, that the Nazis were responsible for Katyn.



It was politically expedient to blame the Soviets for Katyn during the Cold War, which is exactly what the Madden Committee did. But then other's, for reasons unknown, such as V Of A, continued to fall for the hoax.

The Katyn Massacre hoax unravelled because of the EVIDENCE. Indeed, because of the evidence, it only kept going



There was no political expediency for the Soviets, who wanted to be the prime victims of Nazism, not the Jews. That is why the Soviets largely ignored the Jewish war deaths and it was the Polish who conducted the majority of investigations and memorialisation of the death camps.

The mass gassing narrative is still accepted, because of the EVIDENCE. This thread proves you cannot EVIDENCE an alternative and since you cannot EVIDENCE an alternative, logically your doubts about the evidence for gassings are wrong.



That is evidence historians are doing their jobs and critically re-examining the EVIDENCE.



You are being dishonest about what I argued. I said there is no obvious evidence, like intact gas chambers and photos of corpses in mass graves. Instead, there is the evidence of demolished gas chambers and cremated remains, as the Nazis tried to cover up their crimes. Like the difference between a whole, undamaged gun and one that has been smashed up.


Repeatedly using the wrong pronoun, is an example of how you are unable to be civil in the debate. No one wonder this place as died a death. No one else is prepared to put up with your behaviour. I use your refusal to use the correct pronoun to prove what you are like AND your hypocrisy when you complain about being abused.



The mesh columns are referred to in an A-B construction office document and from witnesses. You are being dishonest when you say they are un-evidenced. Un-evidenced means no evidence, not evidence you don't know about, or disagree with.



Why is there nothing from the media not controlled by Jews, such as in the Arab world?



Those who support Palestine, which includes Jews, get criticised by others and vice versa. Considering how you abuse others, you are not in a position to criticise abuse.



The only place where the Katyn hoax was totally accepted, was Russia, because of Soviet control there. Elsewhere, there were groups who did not accept Katyn was by the Nazis. Everywhere else, there were doubts and people who believed the Soviets were responsible. That was because of the EVIDENCE, something you do not understand.



You are ignoring that there is another reason why there are denial laws, which is that Holocaust denial is a lie and a hoax designed to spread hatred of Jewish people. You refuse to answer "where did they go?" because you cannot. You have no evidence from witnesses, docuemnts, physical finds at the death camp sites. Those who successfully exposed Katyn as a Soviet hoax, had evidence. You do not. That is why you refuse to discuss EVIDENCE. Instead you make arguments that are logically flawed and try to pass them off as evidence.



The Katyn Hoax was exposed, becuase of the evidence of what DID happen. You cannot evidence what DID happen, instead of mass gassings. It is ONLY when you can EVIDENCE what did happen, that you can claim to have proved gassing is a hoax. Your present use of logically flawed criticism of the EVIDENCE for gassings, is not acceptable, except to people who do not understand evidence.