Remarks on "Skeptic" Forum

The continuing conversation between you Gibson and Nick Terry on this topic I regard as extremely telling. They have no credible argument!!! 
Even a top holy-H, UK academic has no credible reply to a simple question!! 😮🤦‍♂️
Wow!

As I have mentioned before here, when I first came across the flaws and ’holes’ in the ’holocaust’ narrative I experienced considerable shock, confusion and enotional discomfort. What is called cognitive dissonance.
As an attempt at a remedy I sought out the ‘confessions’ by the alleged perpetrators to convince myself that the ’holocaust’ allegations are in principal and to a large degree still correct and accurate. To my dismay I came to the realisation that their ‘confessions’ were so flawed, non-credible and in some parts physically impossible that they supported and corroborated my dawning realisation of a huge Allied hoax.
I delved further and further into the primary sources in order to confirm or refute my dawning awareness of the ’mass-gassing’ allegation being a hugely exaggerated deception. I also started reading the debates first at CODOH then here. The fact that there were no people online arguing intelligently, credibly, convincingly or even rationally further confirmed the growing understanding of the ’holocaust’ as a racist, anti-German hate trope. That NOBODY for the extermination-genocide could answer the revisionist issues unemotionally, respectfully, credibly and logically was in itself a factor.
I still allowed for the possibility that I might be missing something and even attended a lecture by a ’holocaust survivor’ to get a personal perspective and to ask questions. He ended his lecture with a blatant strawman lie. It was an outrageous smear of Prof. Robert Faurisson. Afterwards I tried to engage him in friendly one-to-one conversation and after making introductory small-talk asked him why he had said that about Faurisson as he must know it wasn’t true. He admitted it wasn’t true but then abruptly turned his back to me and refused to speak further.

It is to my mind precisely such irrational, bizarre and unintelligent behaviour that further confirms my understanding of the reality that we are not discussing a genuine history here. It is instead like discussing irrational beliefs with the cultish-believers of them. The behaviour and mindset of people like Das Prussian, Bernard, Nathan, Jeffnumbers, Statistical mechanical, etc., with all their other deceiving sockpuppet avatars — I regard as yet further evidence that there appears to be no-one who can answer the research and findings of those who have refuted the mass-gassing mythology on core details. No-one! Nobody at all! When the BBC attempted it they chose to use a racist, Jewish celebrity/comedian to make a shallow TV documentary that travelled all the way to Dublin to interview/ridicule and encourage violence against an eccentric irishman who doubted the holocaust narrative. That they chose to send a comedian and a camera crew all that way, when they had the intelligent, erudite, highly qualified academic, and published revisionist Nick Kolleström right on the doorstep (in London) speaks volumes about the lack of desire for genuine interaction with the actual arguments.

People like Roberto Muhlenkamp and Nick Terry are the only ones who appeared to me to have done some actual intelligent reading of the primary sources. But their blatant inability to look objectively at what is contained there (i.e. without applying a strong confirmation-bias) did not ever make me doubt my increasing understanding of ’the holocaust’ as being a quite monumental ahistorical hoax and quasi-religious self-delusion.
The fact that someone like Religion-Professor Deborah Lipstadt is regarded as such an ’authority’ on the subject of holocaust revisionism I regard as yet another nail in the coffin of the holocaust as genuine history. Is she really the best the exterminationist side can find?!! 😮
I have decades of experience of debating and interacting with seriously ’religious’ people and their beliefs and I can genuinely say that believers of the ’holocaust’ mass-gassing mythos are just as cultishly stubborn and irrational in their beliefs as the most born-again bible-thumper or space-cadet, guru-devotee new-ager.

Nick Terry’s recent answer for why there is no single volume that credibly, concisely and convincingly refutes the core revisionist arguments is another nail. His latest nonsense argument about languages is in my opinion shockingly irrational. 

I have been enjoying reading all your replies to the true-believer H-defenders there at Skeptics. You come across as well-read, patient, respectful, reasonable and friendly. That all you get is the usual snide put-downs and insults is in my opinion yet further confirmation that there IS no credble reply to the revisionist position.