|
|
Post by Prudent_Regret on Nov 12, 2021 18:19:02 GMT
You don't have to overlay it, I'll do it for you. You just have to pick the photograph of a known standard gauge that you think is taken at a similar angle as the picture in the spur. I'll do the overlay for you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prudent_Regret on Nov 12, 2021 18:32:48 GMT
Here's another picture of a standard gauge railway from a similar angle:  Look how it perfectly corresponds to the standard-gauge in the reference template:  In comparison to the Treblinka spur:  I am not being biased in picking these photographs. I am choosing the images where the angle appears to be as close as possible to the Treblinka images. I get these results every single time. They are not the same gauge. |
|
blake121666
âď¸
đđđđŤđ˘đđ˘đđ§
Posts: 46
|
Post by blake121666 on Nov 12, 2021 18:34:53 GMT
Show the differences between these 2:   |
|
|
|
Post by Prudent_Regret on Nov 12, 2021 18:38:50 GMT
Here's a picture of a narrow gauge railway in Germany:  As you can see, the angle here is slightly different but it's still close enough that we can see this obviously corresponds to the Treblinka spur:  Small differences in angle-of-view only result in small differences in perspective. |
|
|
|
Post by Prudent_Regret on Nov 12, 2021 18:42:28 GMT
Do you think the two pictures you took are at the same angle? They are obviously not. We are using a basic angle of someone holding a camera pointed down a railway. It should be easy to find a picture of a standard gauge railway with the same angle that corresponds to the Treblinka spur. But you can't.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prudent_Regret on Nov 12, 2021 18:44:52 GMT
My point has been made. Unless he is going to show me a single photograph of a standard gauge railway, taken from a similar angle as the Treblinka spur, that corresponds to the Treblinka Spur (which I know he cannot) then I don't accept his counterargument that the angle is different in the images I am using. I have lost count of how many different images I have shown that all show the exact same result, if he can't even provide one then he has no leg to stand on.
|
|
blake121666
âď¸
đđđđŤđ˘đđ˘đđ§
Posts: 46
|
Post by blake121666 on Nov 12, 2021 19:02:29 GMT
This image: is obviously a narrower gauge than shown here:  AND it is obviously taken at a different angle. What is it that you are doing exactly? Throw me your pixel point correspondences. Tell me exactly how you determined those lines you made. You're crazy if you think the gauges are the same for these two. |
|
|
|
Post by Prudent_Regret on Nov 12, 2021 19:06:59 GMT
It is obviously not narrower, it is the same gauge as it forms approximately the same angle at the vanishing point.
The angle is slightly different, but a slightly different angle is not going to make a metre gauge all of a sudden look like a standard gauge.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prudent_Regret on Nov 12, 2021 19:08:12 GMT
If you take a picture of a metre-gauge railway and then take half a step to the right and take another picture, it's not going to make a standard gauge railway look like a narrow gauge railway. Those photos have the same angle at the vanishing point, and the difference in angle is not significant enough to impact the analysis. You would have to argue that the picture of the Narrow gauge railway was taken at a significantly lower position than the Treblinka spur, which is obviously not the case. The angle is similar, and if anything the Treblinka spur photograph was taken at a slightly lower height, but not enough to make a major difference.
|
|
blake121666
âď¸
đđđđŤđ˘đđ˘đđ§
Posts: 46
|
Post by blake121666 on Nov 12, 2021 19:09:41 GMT
I think you've shown me enough.
I will go to the bother of showing you how different the gauges are between those two pictures above.
You are deluding yourself with what you are doing.
Confirm for me once again that you are claiming the gauges are the same for the two pictures I posted in my last post before I go to the trouble of showing how wrong you are - with mathematical details of their compositions - defining their 3-D metrics and then comparing them properly.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prudent_Regret on Nov 12, 2021 19:13:01 GMT
Please do. I do not know that the other picture is a metre-gauge specifically, and metre gauge comes in 1000mm and 1065mm or something, so these slight nuances won't make much a difference. But please show me how those pictures are obviously different gauges, even though the angle at the vanishing point is very similar.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prudent_Regret on Nov 12, 2021 19:15:14 GMT
It's hard to fathom how you possibly think those pictures are so different in gauge, but you think the railway in this picture looks like the picture of the Treblinka spur: The narrow gauge picture is far, far, far closer to the Treblinka spur than the above picture of a standard gauge railway. |
|
|
|
Post by Prudent_Regret on Nov 12, 2021 19:18:55 GMT
May as well throw in another photograph of the (standard gauge) Malkinia-Siedlce line:  It's comical you think this is the same gauge as the rails embedded in that road. |
|
|
|
Post by Prudent_Regret on Nov 12, 2021 19:24:39 GMT
The Sobibor (standard gauge) railway:  All of these photographs have nearly the exact same angle at the vanishing point and they all corresponds with each-other. None of them is even close to corresponding to the images of the Treblinka spur. |
|
blake121666
âď¸
đđđđŤđ˘đđ˘đđ§
Posts: 46
|
Post by blake121666 on Nov 12, 2021 19:31:25 GMT
It occurred to me that I needn't go through the bother I intended to. Here is the Treblinka rail layed on the rail you think is equivalent gauge:  You are comparing these two in the way you did? Are you joking? What transformation did you make to line these up? Obviously the Treblinka rail is pointed leftward and the other one rightward. |
|
