Is an intermediate/compromise position viable? Dec 19, 2022 20:22:10 GMT
Post by 𝝥𝝰𝘇𝗴𝝻𝝸 on Dec 19, 2022 20:22:10 GMT
Repeating yourself over and over again does nothing for the case you are trying to make. Cite one witness at at time. You constantly do the mass witness quote as shown here:
It is also off topic. That aside, despite interviewing hundred of potential witnesses at those precise locations, Joseph Ginsburg:
"had toured the concentration camps of Auschwitz, Birkenau, Majdanek, Treblinka, Sobibor and all the others in Poland, as a member of the official Soviet inspection team and he found no evidence whatsoever of any attempt on the part of the Germans to exterminate anyone and certainly not by means of lethal gas chambers!"
Ginsberg was there at the time, but some 15 years after the war the witnesses mentioned by the poster Nessie suddenly appear and given credibility due to publications. They had plenty of time to concoct a readable story.
There is contradictory evidence, so one must weigh up an investigator of the times who heard nothing against those who have had time to concoct a story with extreme exaggerations.
The death camps stories were flourishing but neither Dr. Larson nor any other forensic specialist has ever been cited by any Holocaust historian to substantiate a single case of death by poison gas, whether Zyklon-B or any other variety. What death camps remained lay firmly behind the Iron Wall.
It has been mentioned many times that the Soviet Extraordinary Commission was instrumental in concocting the Katyn lie, Poland was a vassal of Moscow as was Eastern Germany and most of Eastern Europe. It was behind the wall of steel that the Holocaust deception was cultivated, disconfirming evidence whisked away.
I have shown readers the weakness of the "Historical method" which is turned around by this poster as to a war against historical religionists like himself and historical investigators. This war is not just with the holocaust but in archaeology as well. For instance, Graham Hancock theories on the origins of civilisation have been dismissed by archaeologists as rubbish. He has been banned from accessing archaeological sites and censored, because his ideas are controversial about the origins of civilization.
The documents cited as people arriving at single locations is flawed, considering the very long stops at the same locations of major labour camps. Aktion 14 f 13 or euthanasia could easily be misconstrued and it appears it has. There has been discussions on the witnesses over and over again about highly exaggerated claims. No one has explained clearly why a Soviet soldier Alexander Pechersky was put to work at a so called extermination camp. This must be seen in the light that he was a Jew and that Soviets soldiers were also allegedly mass murdered by the Germans. (2.8 million). It would be simple to put a bullet in his head, but instead they allow this threat to survive at a death camp where he did reek havoc. He was not just a Soviet Soldier but an Officer. He rejoined the Soviet Army only to have his version used by the Soviets.
Like the Nina, Pinta and Santa Maria, Van Goghs ear Marie Antoinette's cake and door proclamations it is likely that Sobibor at least is mere Soviet Propaganda, like their attempts at Katyn.