General Critique of Nessie's Stock Arguments

A specific example would be when I shared Hoess's account of how Krema I was converted into a gas chamber.  I raised questions about whether it is realistic to think that they converted the room into a gas chamber immediately before the gassing, including drilling holes in the concrete roof, and also whether they would have been able to fit 900 Russians into the room.  

When I confronted you with this, you refused to answer whether you accepted it and lapsed back into declaring the holocaust to be true in general.  

It seems you are claiming that the extermination claims are not heavily dependent on testimonies and that physical and documentary evidence is very, very strong.  However, if we focus on Krema I for a moment, the non-testimony evidence is actually limited to non-existent, even going by your side's sources.  The physical structure was reconstructed after the war.  There's no Prussian blue on the walls.  The only incriminating feature of the room are the holes in the roof which were done after the war.  You can say you believe the holes were there before but you can't say that's "strong" physical evidence.  For documentary evidence, I am not aware of any gassing documents that are even claimed for this building, not even the indirect "criminal trace" sort of stuff.  So then we are dependent almost entirely on testimony and Hoess is one of the main ones for Krema I, along with a few others such as Pery Broad and Filip Mueller.  

That is another deceit from Nessie.
On the old RODOH I narrated exactly such an argument and Nessie responded to it.

It occurred when I was first discovering for the first time the extent of all the blatant lies, legends, exaggerations and clear physical impossibilties in the holocaust mass-gassing mythology. I naturally mentioned what I was discovering to close work colleagues. One of whom must have passed this info on to a female work colleague I would not have shared this info with. During a tea-break she approached and without any preamble or subject introduction affirmed with absolute surety: ”I know the holocaust is true because I saw a survivor who had a number tatooed on her arm”.

I do not remember you confronting me with that. Can you link to where it happened?

I tend not to use Hoess testimony out of principle, because there is evidence of torture to get him to confess. I have also pointed out that his evidence is corroborated by other evidence. The description you quote of a gassing, is the same as many other descriptions, of people being told to undress, crammed into a converted room in a Krema and gassed whilst people outside could hear the distress and screaming.




The lack of Prussian blue on the walls of Krema I can be explained by it not being used long enough for staining to appear and it being thoroughly cleaned to covert it to a bomb shelter. The physical evidence of the holes corroborates witnesses who say they were dug out in 1942 for gassings. Their present state is explained by the conversion to a bomb shelter. There is no evidence the roof of the Krema did not have holes in it in 1941. There is circumstantial evidence, from two 1941 documents from Topf & Sons, about how fast and how many bodies can be cremated, 60 in one hour.

The physical and other evidence from Krema I fits logically with and corroborates the claims of the witnesses and the chronology of their claims. It is like people confessing to murder with a rather unusual murder weapon, that had been coverted for use for another purpose and hidden in plain sight. Everything fits together, logically, evidentially and chronologically.

Which means that since you have failed to evidence what did happen at the AR camps and inside the A-B Kremas and where all the people supposedly not gassed went, and along with all those supposedly not shot, were being accommodated and liberated in 1944 - 45, you have failed to prove your claims. You have also failed to evidence that all European universities and governments, along with many journalists have been successfully hoaxed, or are part of the hoax, to cover up what did happen. 

You have not shown any evidence they were all still open and full of prisoners at the end of the war.



Where? Show me.



Link to and quote the eyewitnesses.

You have a history of making assertions, without showing the evidence. Remember, the burden of proof is on the claimant, so it is your job to show the evidence, even if you think it has been shown before. This forum has thousands of posts and many threads, you may think you have shown me the evidence, but I have not seen it.