Theft of property

The UK treated the interned differently from the US Germans and Japanese, where the lot were collared and all property confiscated. The US camps were konzentrationslager by a different name.

Policies in the UK regarding the property of those interned in the first world war; it is likely the same law would be followed some twenty years later at the outbreak of hostilities.

At the outbreak of war in the UK, enemy aliens had real and estimated property holdings of £100 million (£7.265 billion today or $8.2 billion). After internment private property was not confiscated, but many of the businesses wholly or partly controlled by enemy aliens were liquidated and the portion of the realised assets due to them was vested in government-appointed custodians for the duration of the war. The remainder of the proceeds, after payment of debts, charges and expenses, was normally distributed among non-enemy shareholders and others with a financial entitlement.

However, Partnerships between British subjects and enemy aliens were dissolved after the outbreak of war and enemy asset's subsequently vested
in the custodians.

The conditions of those interned in the UK were as bad as the Jews in the cattle cars heading East.


link

If one takes the time to read the following legal argument 1949: DISTRIBUTION OF GERMAN ENEMY PROPERTY BILL one may get a feel for the complexity. It is clear from this discussion that the British Government wanted to seize assets of the interned if they were German Nationals. All assets of those interned were held by a custodian; it is likely no German or Italian national would have their property returned or any assets unless the transactions were made prior to the Axis pact; the same is true of the Austrians who made transactions prior to the Anschluss. Recently the "Enemy Property Claims Assessment Panel" (EPCAP) has been compensating individuals whose assets were confiscated by the UK government where they had suffered Nazi persecution. This no doubt affect those interned, especially Jews who were interned as enemy aliens. link

After World War II, according to the Potsdam conference held between July 17 and August 2, 1945, Germany was to pay the Allies US$1 Trillion mainly in machinery and manufacturing plants. Sequestering property and money of internees who were not refugees was part and parcel of this.

I do not see how skid stained underpants you claim were integral to mass murder were correlated. Scotsmen do not wear undies so I guess you may not understand the hygiene related issues.

Useless items of confiscation that were burned. Anything else jew?

Explain how skid marked undies can finance as war.

😮 Wow!

First, YES IT IS!!!

And then... link to what evidence has been produced by you showing in this discussion that internees of the Allies were searched upon arrival at camps. You haven’t produced any!

So whether surmising or guessing, this is just a dishonest semantic quibble concealing a deception about the lack of evidence you have produced. 
I.e. A brazen lie!

😮 No, you never did. So... that is another brazen repeating of the same lie as above. That or literally insane self-delusion.

No I did not. So another lie. Personal property and possessions obviously referred to the same thing.
Anything from a hat to a microscope to a fryingpan can be personal property AND a personal possession. Obviously.
 
Your lies are becoming increasingly desperate.
 
THE REALITY: I always challenged you to answer what was the equivalent treatment of prisoners’ possession/property arrested for their ethnicity by the Allies!  Do you understand yet: arrested and incarcerated BY THE ALLIES!!
I never asked for what happened to property of prisoners of just the British and AFTER they were released. So that is a dishonest dodge from you. 🙄 A pathetic and blatantly transparent semantic dodge. 
The same tactic as your dishonest semantic quibble between property and possessions, surmising and guessing.
It is relentless denial, dishonesty, self-delusion and deception to avoid conceding error and ignorance.  

You were never asked about what happened to inmates of British camps AFTER their release. How many times will you attempt to slip in that lie? 

What a crazy, moronic dodge!!!! 😮 OF COURSE, YES!!!! 
That has been my point to you the whole time!
My point has always been that.

Jeez! C’mon face it Nessie, you have been shown to be in error by both myself and Nazgul and are now dishonestly completely reversing your argument rather than honestly admitting that.

I just explained EXACTLY that. So this is further proof you have a severe comprehension disability.
Here it is again:
THE REALITY: I always challenged you to answer what was the equivalent treatment of prisoners’ possession/property arrested for their ethnicity by the Allies! Do you understand yet: arrested and incarcerated BY THE ALLIES!! Not just the British. 
I never asked for what happened to property of prisoners of just the British and AFTER they were released. That is all that you provided reference to plus photos of British prisoners in their own clothes. I previously explained why neither answered the challenge.
You were challenged to provide verifiable, authoritative references (not biased surmises or guesses) showing the procedure by the Allies!! And you have N E V E R done that.
Do you understand now?
If you still can not understand why you have never answered the challenge, then this is proof you are unable to discuss intelligently, reasonably and honestly.