Theft of property

Just stating something is so does not make it so.
Otherwise you would accept the accuracy of this:
…
”We know that coteries of Jews worldwide have since the Napoleonic era until the present time been appropriating the monetary gold reserves of all of the national banks of all the countries they have infiltrated and now control. Only a few nations now exist outside of that economic control and dominance. Cuba, Syria, North Korea, Iran and Russia are a few of those countries and tellingly they are the countries the prediminantly Jewish-controlled media, film industry and puppet government leaders are constantly conditioning us to view as ’enemies’ and as immoral."

The evidence of the miracles of Jesus and his apostles was just as ”well known, studied and evidenced” for many centuries, and only a stupid and stubbornly dishonest individual would attempt to present unevidenced claims as proof of something merely because it fits a cultishly believed, racist and hate-driven mythology.

History and truth can only be ascertained by looking at the evidence with neutrality and within context.

That deceitfully omitted context has been highlighted here. And a rather dishonest and unintelligent individual is deceitfully trying to bury it.

Have you any evidence to show the Nazis were not stealing/looting/seizing or whatever term you want to use to describe the removal of another person's property without their permission?

Are you seriously suggesting that there is no evidence of Nazi theft?



It was you who introduced the context of the Allies and internment here;

rodoh.freeforums.net/post/11941/thread

You said;

"I wonder if there is someone here who can instead of looking for and interpreting (misinterpreting?) ANY ‘evidence’ to fit a cherished, pre-concieved, cultish belief-system can do research and find out what happened to the possessions of all or any of the people arrested, transported and then incarcerated in British and American concentration camps."

You have dropped that because I have pointed out there is no evidence that the British were stealing/looting/seizing the property of those they interred. I have not looked at what happened in the USA, but sionce you have dropped this issue, I suspect it is the same and the Americans were not stealing/looting/seizing property from those they had interred.

There is evidence the Nazis stole from the Jews, there is no evidence of theft from those interred by the British and Americans.

www.lootedart.com/MN6Y2X825501

"In the Netherlands, 8.5 million citizens suffered losses estimated at 3.6 billion guilders. Approximately one-third of these losses were borne by Jews, who comprised only 1.6% of the total population. In today's terms, the German occupiers stripped the Jewish population of assets worth $7 billion."

"Beginning with a survey of international law and various definitions of 'looting', Professor Aalders show show the Germans systematically robbed Dutch Jewry through a variety of means that gave the outward appearance of 'honest trading'. Forced to sell under duress and at unreasonably low prices, few dared refuse the Germans on the doorstep when threatened with prison or incarceration in a camp."

That study is honest about the Dutch involvement and collaboration with the Nazis in assisting with the identification, looting and selling on of Jewish property. It is likely the biggest theft of Dutch property in the history of the Netherlands.

🤦‍♂️
Holy moly!!! 😮
No! I am not suggesting that. 

Which is further evidence of your moronic inability to comprehend extremely simple points.
I have not dropped it. That is just more of your predilection for avoiding facts you can’t incorporate in your holyhoax mythology by making moronic, dishonest statements. You have never addressed it.
Otherwise quote where you referenced what happened to the personal possessions of the people of ethnic origins deemed to be potentially belligerent upon their arriving at Allied concentration camps.

😮Wow!
This reply from you is further proof you are of seriously low intelligence.

Concentrate now: when Jews arrived at concentration camps their possessions were taken from them, including their clothes. They were showered and shaved, their clothes were disinfected and/or steamed and in many cases they were given prison clothes. At Auschwitz their clothes and other possessions were stored and sorted at a location in the camp called ‘Kanada’.

THE QUESTION POSED TO YOU: What happened to the possessions of Allied prisoners who were ALSO treated as potential fifth columnists for their ‘enemy’ ethnic origins? What happened to their possessions when they arrived at the ALLIED CONCENTRATION CAMPS.
Provide verifiable, authoritative references.

Yiu HAVE NOT provided any answer to this question yet.

That you STILL haven’t understood this extremely simple question demonstrates the severe comprehension disability that has been pointed out to you numerous times and which you are in denial of.

With this conclusive proof of it in this conversation, do you finally acknowledge it now?