Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,207 
|
Post by Nessie on Dec 15, 2021 16:50:20 GMT
NESSIE wrote: I have proved the methodology I use is the same as used by university history departments and the police. No you havenโt. You havenโt come anywhere close to doing that. Nowhere near. You just keep claiming it without ever demonstrating that. That you still donโt attempt to โ nor comprehend how to โ demonstrate it, I suggest is further evidence of the Dunning-Kruger syndrome. Instead you are doing what you repeatedly do with holocaust narrative disagreements โ you just post links as if that is a compelling argument. To most intelligent people a web link obviously isnโt a compellng argument. Yet unfortunately you canโt comprehend that simple fact. Plus it often it transpires you do that (post urls) without even understanding what the links you post contain. I posted two links, with quotes, which prove the use of corroboration and evidence by historians and in law. It is actually bizarre that you are asking me for that. You must be one of very few people who need it to be proved that historians and the police use corroborating evidence to prove claims. I was asked to name one star witness. I said there was no such thing, and that the evidence is from multiple credible witnesses whose evidence has been assessed and tested. I produced a list made up by Das Prussian and you spotted a name that should not be on that list. I have also posted links to a list I produced specific to TII, which includes links to their evidence, here it is again; www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=32918 I have gone into a lot of detail as to why I, and historians and lawyers regard them as credible. You asked me to prove I studied history at university and I was in the police. There is no way to do that without identifying myself. My graduation certificate and police end of service certificate are obviously in my name. Or, is there some other way you accept I am telling the truth? I use corroborating evidence to prove what happened. I post links to how historians and the police use corroborating evidence to prove what happened. That is proof I use the same methodology. You claiming it is not, without explaining why, is an epic fail from you. |
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Dec 15, 2021 18:32:47 GMT
No you havenโt. You havenโt come anywhere close to doing that. Nowhere near. You just keep claiming it without ever demonstrating that. That you still donโt attempt to โ nor comprehend how to โ demonstrate it, I suggest is further evidence of the Dunning-Kruger syndrome. Instead you are doing what you repeatedly do with holocaust narrative disagreements โ you just post links as if that is a compelling argument. To most intelligent people a web link obviously isnโt a compellng argument. Yet unfortunately you canโt comprehend that simple fact. Plus it often it transpires you do that (post urls) without even understanding what the links you post contain. I posted two links, with quotes, which prove the use of corroboration and evidence by historians and in law. That is NOT what you were asked to prove. Really, what a deeply idiotic reply. I hope others are reading this. As it shows how out of touch you are with really, really simple distinctions. You canโt comprehend simple arithmetic. You canโt understand simple challenges. You still donโt understand simple terms like what constitutes empirical evidence. Etc., etc., etc. And now you canโt demonstrate that your methodology used by you for asserting the accuracy of the H-narrative you learnt at University and from the police. Ha ha ha! ๐คฃ And now you use dishonest misrepresentation, to try and turn this proof of YOUR miscomprehension back on me. Wow! What an epic, epic fail. Truly amazing even by your low standards. You have done no such thing. This is just yet another unsubstantiated claim. This is further dishonesty and misrepresentation of what was asked of you and of what actually occurred. ๐ Which shows that the legally-protected narrative about the claimed Jewish experience during WW2 can only be maintained by lying and misrepresentation. So...Great work, Nessie. You are showing the narrative cannot be defended by honest means. ๐๐๐ Maybe for your own sanity and integrity you ought to come clean and admit now that you can ONLY maintain your defence of this mass-gassing narrative by dishonest tactics and lying about your qualifications. Oh boy! Yet another dishonest misrepresentation. That is like claiming: โI am a trained and qualified concert pianist who has played the standard classical solo piano reportoire to paying audiences. I posted links to what that the standard classical piano reportoire is which proves I can also play it.โ But going by your answers above I doubt you will understand nor will see the accuracy of this comparison. What an amazingly apt demonstration of THIS topic thread: viz. absurdity and issues with simple logic! ๐๐คฃ |
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,207
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 30, 2022 9:24:24 GMT
So, Nazgul is been-there, going by how Nazgul's post above; rodoh.info/post/7130/threadhas been edited by been-there; "Last Edit: 40 minutes ago by been_there: spelling corrections" That explains a lot. It proves that been-there is anti-open debate and wants an echo chamber where he is unchallenged. He already has that on this forum in the section "Formal Propositions". If wants a closed debate, he should stick to that part of the forum. |
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Apr 30, 2022 9:30:10 GMT
So, Nazgul is been-there, going by how Nazgul's post above; rodoh.info/post/7130/threadhas been edited by been-there; "Last Edit: 40 minutes ago by been_there: spelling corrections" That explains a lot. It proves that been-there is anti-open debate and wants an echo chamber where he is unchallenged. He already has that on this forum in the section "Formal Propositions". If wants a closed debate, he should stick to that part of the forum. It means I for some reason the board has provided me the ability to amend anyoneโs posts. ๐ Something I just used for the first time. The new board is quite buggy. |
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,207
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 30, 2022 9:35:58 GMT
So, Nazgul is been-there, going by how Nazgul's post above; rodoh.info/post/7130/threadhas been edited by been-there; "Last Edit: 40 minutes ago by been_there: spelling corrections" That explains a lot. It proves that been-there is anti-open debate and wants an echo chamber where he is unchallenged. He already has that on this forum in the section "Formal Propositions". If wants a closed debate, he should stick to that part of the forum. It means I for some reason the board has provided me the ability to amend anyoneโs posts. ๐ Something I just used for the first time. The new board is quite buggy. It happened at the same time as another reply to your post about Danuta Czech was moved
If you do not want to be challenged, post in your echo chamber at "Formal Propositions".
|
|
๐๐๐จ๐ญ๐ญ
๐ฆ
๐๐ฆ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐ญ๐จ๐ซ ๐๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ฎ๐ฌ
Posts: 209
|
Post by ๐๐๐จ๐ญ๐ญ on Oct 8, 2022 23:43:22 GMT
I'm looking into the complaint. Nessie, I sent you a PM. There is no hurry to respond. I am just making sure that you see it. Thanks ~ Scott  |
|
๐๐๐จ๐ญ๐ญ
๐ฆ
๐๐ฆ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐ญ๐จ๐ซ ๐๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ฎ๐ฌ
Posts: 209
|
Post by ๐๐๐จ๐ญ๐ญ on Oct 9, 2022 23:20:10 GMT
Okay, this thread "Nessie Board Censorship" will be quarantined for a week and then it will be restored to MH3. I hope that the dust can settle. In the future avoid calling each other "Liars." When something is challenged, please clarify the meaning, source your material โ and then afterwards, both sides just move on. Thank You. ~ Scott |
|
