What is the Holocaust?

Well, perhaps not a miracle. Just a dud round.

Q: WHAT IS THE HOLOCAUST?
A: A succession of many, many miracles.

Many tales by ‘H-survivors’ come from people who seem to genuinely believe that they only remained alive — despite being fed, housed and cared for by the Germans in concentration camps for months or years — due to numerous ‘miracles’.

The unevidenced ‘genocide’ allegation is presumably what makes them all believe they are examples of miraculous ‘survival’.

One such miracle being claimed here is that this ‘survivor’ and her mother only “... avoided being taken on a death march because she and her mother overslept and were left behind”. 
🙄🤦‍♂️

Plus she claims she and her mother were paraded nude before the ubuiquitous Dr. Mengele (yeah sure!) and her mother was selected by him to be gassed. But, but, but... she survived. She wasn’t gassed.
Wow!! But... How? How did she survive being selected and taken away with those others selected for gassing?
No explanation is given other than it was a “miracle”. 

And the TV hosts not only accept this nonsense, they are deeply respectful and obsequious.

It’s psychotic behaviour from all involved: the ‘survivor’, her mother, the TV hosts, the TV programme editor, the TV channel executives, the Daily Mail editor, the journalist, the photo researcher, etc., etc., etc.
You don’t get some person allowed on prime-time TV to spout obvious anti-German, racist nonsense and then get that repeated in a main-stream newspaper, without a great many, many people accepting that nonsense.

This is a sign of societal psychosis and mass-delusion!

How fascinating! 🙂
So Dr. Terry thinks my misconception was having ”the idea that the Holocaust meant killing”!!!🤣
Oh boy! 🤦‍♂️

I once wrote a satirical spoof on the holocaust narrative being updated like a computer operating system in order to keep abreast of historical advances and to still be credible to its target audience. 
Anyone interested can read that here.

And I see from the link Agandaur provided that Nick Terry has just made quite a collosal misrepresentation of both: 1. what caused me to reassess my position on this quasi-religous, cult-like belief-system , and 2. my prior understanding before that reassessment.
Deeply fascinating!
It seems to me to show another clear sign that belief in this narrative requires the dishonest tactics of strawman misrepresentation, and ad homimem attack of the actual revisionist arguments that are undermining and refuting that belief. Tactics which in my experience are quite a common reaction from people who are attached to a belief in a cult-like way.

Something I also wrote about here (‘Cultish-belief that relies on censorship and ad hominem’ and here (’Leaving the cult of H’) which Nick Terry presumably read. 

So the following misrepresentation by him I think also fits THIS topic here (link) extremely well.

I am referring to his misrepresentation of a). my own approach as ’denial’ when it isn’t, b.) misrepresenting my first encounter with a holocaust survivor in person, and c.) his own inadvertent acknowledgement that the holocaust narrative as it has been indoctrinated into the masses is both inaccurate and in need of amending.

Here is what this professional indoctrinator wrote:
Ironically, this does rather reinforce the subject of this other topic-thread. Namely, that attitudes and understandings ARE definitely changing. 

And it appears to be changing especially amongst those at the cutting edge of indoctrinating new generations into the finer details of this pseudo-historical narrative. They deep-down know, I think, that the revisionist arguments are credible and backed up by the empirical evidence (or lack of it supporting the traditional H-narrative).
They therefore have to subsume the resulting cognitive dissonance which that causes them, by:
1.) misrepresenting the messengers (as neo-Nazis, anti-semites! deniers, etc.,)
2.) subtly and self-deludingly amending what they believe to avoid an embarrassing, humiliating and identity-destroying climb-down.
 
 So what exactly is ’the holocaust’ now?
According to Dr. Terry, it apparently is no longer the ’belief’ that it describes the attempt to exterminate ALL Jews resulting in the mass-murder of 6 million of them.
As according to what he has written here, the ’holocaust’ narrative as he now presents it, no longer “emphasises extermination”! 😮😮😮
 
And if ”absorbing the idea that the holocaust meant killing”, is now seen by professional holocaust-history experts as a “misconception” what does that now leave us with?
 
Without “killing” — or more specifically the allegation of a systematic mass-murder of miliions in gas chambers — what exactly is ’the holocaust’ now?! 🤔

If Nazi policy had been the removal by emigration or expulsion of the Jews, it would have been considered a cruel and scandalous policy, akin to ethnic cleansing, that would have caused horrific hardship. If that policy had included the use of the Jews as forced labourers during the war, that would have also been considered a horrific crime against a specific group of people. Even without the mass killings, the Nazi policies laid out in the Nuremberg laws and the expulsions and forced labour, would have been considered a c rime against humanity.

Most (all?) revisionists do not deny that there was a policy to remove the Jews and their use as forced labour. The denial is about the mass killings, in particular the gassings.