Turnagain
โ๏ธ
๐๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐๐
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Sept 23, 2022 14:32:27 GMT
Nessie wrote:[/quote]
So, deportees were sent to Treblinka II, stayed there for short periods of time and were then transported to alternate destinations. That is circumstantial evidence of mass murder. I can't follow your reasoning.
Your witnesses are known liars and lied about the purpose of the building. You have a handful of tiles and no other viable evidence that the building functioned as a homicidal gas chamber.
|
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Sept 23, 2022 14:46:33 GMT
So, deportees were sent to Treblinka II, stayed there for short periods of time and were then transported to alternate destinations. That is circumstantial evidence of mass murder. I can't follow your reasoning. You cannot follow my reasoning, because of your misrepresentation of the evidence. Maybe you will understand it, if you do not misrepresent the evidence. Deportees were sent to Treblinka II in mass transports, whereby a few stayed there for short periods of time and were then transported to alternate destinations and the rest were never seen again. That process was also reported at other death camps. Some got lucky and were used for work, the rest were gassed. What did that building function as? Show your evidence.
|
|
Turnagain
โ๏ธ
๐๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐๐
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Sept 23, 2022 15:17:30 GMT
Nessie wrote:
That makes about as much sense as saying that a hundred thousand people attended a football game at a stadium. The next day the stadium was empty so all of those people were murdered. Where are the graves and the cremains? You have none. Only the unproven claims by Lukaszkiewicz and Colls. Neither offer any undeniable proof for the claims.
I have exactly just as much proof that the building functioned as a shower as you do for it's function as a homicidal gas chanber. IOW, and handful of tiles.
|
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Sept 23, 2022 15:23:23 GMT
Nessie wrote: That makes about as much sense as saying that a hundred thousand people attended a football game at a stadium. The next day the stadium was empty so all of those people were murdered. The reason why it does not make sense to you, is because you have decided to pretend there is no other evidence. You are pretending that there is no evidence of graves and cremains, by pretending you can dismiss the evidence of graves and cremains. I have multiple witnesses it functioned as a gas chamber. You have no witnesses it functioned as a shower. I have circumstantial evidence of mass murder at TII. You have no evidence something else happened inside TII. Therefore, your claim you have "exactly just as much proof" as I do, is not true.
|
|
Turnagain
โ๏ธ
๐๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐๐
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Sept 23, 2022 21:33:02 GMT
Nessie wrote:
It's no pretense that neither Lukaszkiewicz nor Colls provided any rigorous evidence to support their claims. You can stamp your feet and screech, "Did too, did too" from now til forever but the fact remains that neither Lukaszkiewicy nor Colls presented any incontrovertible evidence to support their claims.
You have multiple liars and the same amount of physical evidence as I.
|
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Sept 24, 2022 7:01:27 GMT
Nessie wrote: It's no pretense that neither Lukaszkiewicz nor Colls provided any rigorous evidence to support their claims. You can stamp your feet and screech, "Did too, did too" from now til forever but the fact remains that neither Lukaszkiewicy nor Colls presented any incontrovertible evidence to support their claims. You are only fooling yourself. You arrogantly suggest you know better than all the archaeologists and historians who have assessed their work and accepted it. It is so obvious that you only rejecting their reports, because they say what you do not want to hear! You have no witnesses and no physical evidence to prove there are not large areas of disturbed ground containing cremated remains. Your level of self-deception is remarkable.
|
|
Turnagain
โ๏ธ
๐๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐๐
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Sept 24, 2022 10:15:21 GMT
Nessie's witnesses are known to be liars. Nothing else can be said when such as Rajchman and Czarny claim blood is flammable and the so-called Treblinka historian, Rachel Auerbach, declares that blood was a first class flammable. Those and other egregious lies by his witnesses prove them to be liars. Of that there can be no doubt.
There is no bonafide evidence by either Lukaszkiewicz or Colls of any graves or cremains found at the Treblinka II site. None. There should be at least 2,000 tons of cremains plus the associated wood ash buried at Treblinka II. Nobody has ever recovered any graves, cremains or wood ash at Treblinka II. That is incontrovertible.
The fact is that the holyhoax is a religious experience for Nessie. A religious belief doesn't allow for any rigorous scientific investigations of it's claims. That is fine and dandy for a religion but Nessie has taken it to the secular level, the holyhoax. Anything inimical to the official dogma is automatically rejected and anything claimed for it is automatically accepted. For Nessie it's true, the six million died and that is both the beginning and end of the story. In holyhoax land, that is the only truth.
|
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Sept 24, 2022 11:59:51 GMT
Nessie's witnesses are known to be liars. Nothing else can be said when such as Rajchman and Czarny claim blood is flammable and the so-called Treblinka historian, Rachel Auerbach, declares that blood was a first class flammable. Those and other egregious lies by his witnesses prove them to be liars. Of that there can be no doubt. The witnesses can also be interpreted as saying it was as if blood was flammable, it was like the blood was flammable. Your literal interpretation is not necessarily the correct one. That is not true. Anyone who reads the reports will see you are being dishonest. When I ask you to example that, you produce hearsay and rumour and I have to explain to you why I reject hearsay and rumour. You are lying when you say I automatically accept and reject evidence based solely on whether it backs up the gassings claims or not. I accept corroborated evidence and reject hearsay and rumour. Show me an example of corroborated evidence that proves something other than gassings took place inside an AR camp. The mass gassing claims are evidenced. Your claims of no gassings and TII was a transit camp is not evidenced. You take evidence of the widely known selection process that took place at other camps and witnesses who may not even have been at TII and dishonestly present it as evidence of it being a transit camp. You conveniently ignore the transit camp claim was made by Eric Hunt, who has since admitted he was wrong. Your self-deception is remarkable. You demand I believe in a massive hoax, whereby the Nazis cooperated in hiding millions of Jews and pretending they gassed them!!!!!!
|
|
Turnagain
โ๏ธ
๐๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐๐
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Sept 24, 2022 20:49:11 GMT
Nessie wrote:
What Nessie doesn't say is the myriad of lies that he has to cover for with his excuses. His endless litany of "mistakes", "emotive language" and "the witness can't be taken literally". Can any of the witnesses' accounts of the homicidal gassing be taken literally? Apparently not since Nessie refuses to name and quote any such witness.
Anyone who reads those reports from an unprejudiced viewpoint can see that the claims of the investigators are unsupported. There are no samples taken, no laboratory tests performed and no photo sequences of the Lukaszkiewicz investigation. That is acceptable for Nessie. Colls makes no claim to finding the graves. "Probable graves" but no definitive claim of, "Here are the graves". Neither does she publish the GPR profile of the area she claimed to have scanned. Her claim that the tiles she recovered were from the gas chamber is based on her supposition and unproven claim that a gas chamber actually existed. None of which is of any import to Nessie. The holyhoax is first and foremost a fact.
Nessie claims that the Germans gassed the Jews. Nessie must prove that to be a fact. There is no unequivocal evidence that millions of Jews were steamed, suffocated, gassed with a pesticide or with CO in any of the alleged extermination camps found solely in the Soviet zone of occupation. It's not the revisionist's job to prove what happened to the Jews, only that the Jews weren't gassed, (steamed, suffocated, etc.) buried, exhumed, cremated and reburied. That has been done to a fare thee well.
Nessie claims that mass gassing is "evidenced". IOW, his claim of mass gassing remains unproven. As stated above, the holyhoax is Nessie's religion. Whatever conjectures that support his belief system is accepted and whatever evidence is inimical to his belief is rejected. The holyhoax is the beginning and the end of the story.
|
|
|
Post by ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐๐ด๐ป๐ธ on Sept 25, 2022 1:42:11 GMT
Nessie claims that the Germans gassed the Jews. Nessie must prove that to be a fact. Why bother when you can simply ask a 1,000,000,000,0001,000,000,000,000 times the following:
|
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Sept 25, 2022 7:11:54 GMT
Nessie wrote: What Nessie doesn't say is the myriad of lies that he has to cover for with his excuses. His endless litany of "mistakes", "emotive language" and "the witness can't be taken literally". Can any of the witnesses' accounts of the homicidal gassing be taken literally? Apparently not since Nessie refuses to name and quote any such witness. The Nazi evidence is more literal, which is why you have to claim, with no evidence, they were all coerced during their trials, by Germans, in Germany, into supporting the Jews and lying. Show me evidence that people normally speak literally and that a truthful witness will not make mistakes. Many so called mistakes, are just examples of you misrepresenting what witnesses actually said and mixing rumour with eyewitness evidence. You demand technology that was not necessarily available to the investigators. Did Lukaszkiewicz have access to a lab? Does his original report contain photos? You fail to understand the language used by C S-C is due to her work being non invasive. She finds large pits in the area where the witness said large grave were dug, but she does not dig into them, so she described them as "there is a strong case for arguing that they represent burial areas" and probable graves. Scientists leave room for further investigation. You look for any excuse to cast doubt on their work, because it says what you do not want to hear. You present no evidence of undisturbed ground. You demand faith in your judgement with no evidence. Turnagin claims the Nazis did not gas Jews. He presents no evidence to back up that claim and show what did happen. Instead, because I have evidenced my claim, he has to think up excuses to rubbish the evidence I have. By all normal standards, the evidence provided is sufficient to prove mass gassings. Until deniers produce evidence of what did happen, I will not support their faiths and beliefs.
|
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Sept 25, 2022 7:13:24 GMT
Nessie claims that the Germans gassed the Jews. Nessie must prove that to be a fact. Why bother when you can simply ask a 1,000,000,000,0001,000,000,000,000 times the following: That you cannot answer that question, should cause you to correct your beliefs and realise they are wrong. Denial is a hoax and a really bad one, but you still fall for it!
|
|
|
Post by ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐๐ด๐ป๐ธ on Sept 25, 2022 7:33:14 GMT
Why bother when you can simply ask a 1,000,000,000,0001,000,000,000,000 times the following: That you cannot answer that question, should cause you to correct your beliefs and realise they are wrong. Denial is a hoax and a really bad one, but you still fall for it! Its been answered fully. The fact that you refuse to take notes or try and remember details is not our issue. They went to the Russian East as Korherr said; then they, not all, came back.
|
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Sept 25, 2022 8:14:20 GMT
That you cannot answer that question, should cause you to correct your beliefs and realise they are wrong. Denial is a hoax and a really bad one, but you still fall for it! Its been answered fully. The fact that you refuse to take notes or try and remember details is not our issue. They went to the Russian East as Korherr said; then they, not all, came back. Korherr said he was told they were resettled in the Lublin District, which is not the Russian east.
There is no evidence that in 1944, there were millions of Jews in camps and ghettos in the Russian east.
|
|
|
Post by ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐๐ด๐ป๐ธ on Sept 25, 2022 8:26:16 GMT
Korherr said he was told they were resettled in the Lublin District, which is not the Russian east There is no evidence that in 1944, there were millions of Jews in camps and ghettos in the Russian east. He said the Russian East in his official report. There is more than enough evidence of about 1200 "judenlagers" in Ostland, Ukraine and Poland; that evidence has been presented. There is hard evidence of a highly mobile Jewish work force. These camps could cater for 2.4 million people. By 44 most had fled back towards the rest; this is also evidence with Bobruysk men being sent back to the GG to resume work in the various judenlagers.
|
|