Is this lie and reply a sign of mental impairment?

In the news at the moment is Rebekkah Hardy a famous football-players wife who betrayed a friend (Mrs Rooney) by leaking Rooney’s private messages on a closed Instagram account to sleazy ’gossip’ newspapers.
Roony set a trap to see which of her friends were leaking. When she FACTUALLY revealed that it was the Hardy account, Rebekkah instead of accepting the exposé chose to double the injury by suing Rooney for libel.
The chutzpah is phenomenal: first the betrayal of privacy for cash, then the complete denial PLUS suing for more cash AND creating more grief.
It is sign of a compulsive liar.

Recently another famous woman did something very similar: I’m talking of Amber Heard. She physically abused her famous husband, then accused him of that when he told her he was divorcing her.
She then escalated the grief she was causing him by wrecking his career and accepting a bogus judgement by a British female Judge in a British court that falsely corroborated Heard’s false accusation that her husband was a wife beater.

She then increased the damage and injury to his career by repeating the false accusation in a publication in America for cash.
So... He took her to court in America for libel and WON!

Anyone who saw Heard’s court testimony could see she was a manupulative, conniving LIAR!! To a quite crazy degree.
But when she was exposed as such, and lost the case, did she stop her lies and false accusations? No! She still repeated them in TV interviews!!

 .. .. .. .. ..

One thing these two lying women have in common is that even when their lies have been soundly refuted, they can not admit it. They just lie bigger.

Heard and Hardy both deny the evidence showing they both lied while under oath! They seem to think just repeating their same lie and re-accussing their victim more vehemently will somehow convince people. 🤦‍♂️🤪
It is crazy behaviour.

And it seems to me to be predominantly feminine behaviour: once they have started a lie, they won’t retract it. Instead they increase it/amplify it.

 .. .. .. ..

I see a similar thing going on here at RODOH. A person (we all know who) will never admit when they have been caught out lying, inventing, dodging and being in error — not about the holocaust narrative, not about human biology, not about simple word definitions, not about anything. This person also just lies bigger and accuses others of doing what in reality THEY THEMSELVES are guilty of.

This person claims to be University educated, police-trained, and male. I doubt all three claims. And if I am correct, then this person can not admit now that those three claims are lies: as they have been repeating them for too long.
I sse it as the same pattern of behaviou shown by Heard and Hardy.

And I see this as symptomatic of the type of mind-set that has looked at all the factual refutations of holyhoax lore but can not bring themself to admit the reality of the factual refutations. This amount of blatant lying by this one individual just seems to be a feminine version of it.

Ironically the psychological profile has been identified with a term that ’Holyhoax-believers’ like to accuse skeptics of their belief with.

Anybody trying to reason with H-believers about aspects of the protected holocaust-narrative and experiencing the repeated refusal by all online defenders to admit numerous simple facts of science and reason if they contradict the narrative, will understand that the issue is psychological not historical.

And there is a term for this type of delusional psychology.
Here is an excerpt from an article on it:

Crikey the world knows that Nessie will grasp onto anything that supports his idea of reality and rejects anything (even from real holocaust survivors) that does not support this view. He is very flexible with the truth and reality; to him it is just play dough or putty that can be moulded and remoulded into any shape at a whim. He is a very very shallow human being.

I gotta' admit that Nessie has seemed to have lost the plot on that one. That seems to be a regular occurrence with Nessie and the witnesses to the alleged atrocities at Treblinka. It seems that his belief in the holyhoax has put him 'round the bend.

Observation from the peanut gallery...

This idea of Nessie being somehow female, or "feminine", really just seems like an odd hill to die on, especially if you believe that a fake history has been propagated, spread, and stubbornly defended, by an assortment of characters who mostly appear to be male.

And if we're talking about celebrities, you'd have to be living under a rock not to see how Donald Trump is like Amber Heard squared with those kind of traits which were categorized as feminine.

Not to mention, new-ish research shows how in fact this kind of oblivious confidence may in fact be a trait driven by high testosterone levels.

My point is not that men have to inherently be like this, by the way. There are definitely some who are extremely clear minded and willing to admit wrongness.

I've seen some of it. It isn't great. I wonder if it could be people similar to the Holocaust Controversies folks, who partially use the board more as a sounding board so they can waterproof their own narratives from glaring holes.

I just had a look at his last comments and had a feeling of passing into some labyrinthine, logic-defying realm that, once entered, is hard to get out of should I participate. I did not comment.