|
Post by been_there on Jul 1, 2022 19:26:21 GMT
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Aug 1, 2022 18:51:28 GMT
In the news at the moment is Rebekkah Hardy a famous football-players wife who betrayed a friend (Mrs Rooney) by leaking Rooneyโs private messages on a closed Instagram account to sleazy โgossipโ newspapers. Roony set a trap to see which of her friends were leaking. When she FACTUALLY revealed that it was the Hardy account, Rebekkah instead of accepting the exposรฉ chose to double the injury by suing Rooney for libel. The chutzpah is phenomenal: first the betrayal of privacy for cash, then the complete denial PLUS suing for more cash AND creating more grief. It is sign of a compulsive liar.
Recently another famous woman did something very similar: Iโm talking of Amber Heard. She physically abused her famous husband, then accused him of that when he told her he was divorcing her. She then escalated the grief she was causing him by wrecking his career and accepting a bogus judgement by a British female Judge in a British court that falsely corroborated Heardโs false accusation that her husband was a wife beater.
She then increased the damage and injury to his career by repeating the false accusation in a publication in America for cash. So... He took her to court in America for libel and WON!
Anyone who saw Heardโs court testimony could see she was a manupulative, conniving LIAR!! To a quite crazy degree. But when she was exposed as such, and lost the case, did she stop her lies and false accusations? No! She still repeated them in TV interviews!!
.. .. .. .. ..
One thing these two lying women have in common is that even when their lies have been soundly refuted, they can not admit it. They just lie bigger. Heard and Hardy both deny the evidence showing they both lied while under oath! They seem to think just repeating their same lie and re-accussing their victim more vehemently will somehow convince people. ๐คฆโโ๏ธ๐คช It is crazy behaviour.
And it seems to me to be predominantly feminine behaviour: once they have started a lie, they wonโt retract it. Instead they increase it/amplify it.
.. .. .. ..
I see a similar thing going on here at RODOH. A person (we all know who) will never admit when they have been caught out lying, inventing, dodging and being in error โ not about the holocaust narrative, not about human biology, not about simple word definitions, not about anything. This person also just lies bigger and accuses others of doing what in reality THEY THEMSELVES are guilty of.
This person claims to be University educated, police-trained, and male. I doubt all three claims. And if I am correct, then this person can not admit now that those three claims are lies: as they have been repeating them for too long. I sse it as the same pattern of behaviou shown by Heard and Hardy.
And I see this as symptomatic of the type of mind-set that has looked at all the factual refutations of holyhoax lore but can not bring themself to admit the reality of the factual refutations. This amount of blatant lying by this one individual just seems to be a feminine version of it.
Ironically the psychological profile has been identified with a term that โHolyhoax-believersโ like to accuse skeptics of their belief with.
Anybody trying to reason with H-believers about aspects of the protected holocaust-narrative and experiencing the repeated refusal by all online defenders to admit numerous simple facts of science and reason if they contradict the narrative, will understand that the issue is psychological not historical.
And there is a term for this type of delusional psychology. Here is an excerpt from an article on it:
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Aug 13, 2022 6:53:29 GMT
โA woman who was a little mad lived in a small village with her husband, and the elders of that village liked to tease her and make fun of her because she was also rather gullible and stupid. One day they decided to play a prank on her to see just how gullible and stupid she was. They told her: 'we have some bad news for you. Your husband has become a widower.'
She believed them and started crying out in grief, 'My husband has become a widower, my husband has become a widower!'
Some of the people she passed on the street laughed at her and said, 'Why are you mourning? You are very much alive. How can your husband be a widower if you yourself are alive to grieve about it?'
'The ones in charge of the village have told me this,' she replied, 'and I trust them. They are very knowledgeable, reliable people. If they are saying that my husband has become a widower, it must be true.โ
|
|
|
Post by Ulios on Aug 13, 2022 11:10:50 GMT
Crikey the world knows that Nessie will grasp onto anything that supports his idea of reality and rejects anything (even from real holocaust survivors) that does not support this view. He is very flexible with the truth and reality; to him it is just play dough or putty that can be moulded and remoulded into any shape at a whim. He is a very very shallow human being.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Aug 28, 2022 15:31:49 GMT
I recently posted the full quote of Rajchmanโs ludicrous lie claiming the blood of 250,000 Jews caught fire and was ablaze for a day and a night. I provided a complete reference to the memoir it was published in, the year that publication was printed AND the page number. In other words I provided a verifiable reference to a primary source. But for Nessie none of that makes any dent in her/his crazy approach to her/his holyhoax belief.
Nessie claimed that Rajchman NEVER wrote that it was the blood that was burning.
When I selected Rajchmanโs exact words concerning what he described was actually burning, thus proving he DID claim it was blood, Nessie went into complete psychosis โdenierโ mode and denied not only what Rajchman claimed but also denied that I had originally provided the full quote in its entirety.
Here again is that full quote, without any cherry-picking or โquote-miningโ nor removal from context:
Here is Nessieโs psychotic, irrational, illogical denial: Which is nonsensical, delusional denial as Rajchman is still saying it was the blood that was burning, even if he described it as โburning as if fuelโ.
Nessie took this insane degree of denial even further, by quoting the passage but stubbornly insisting it didnโt say what he had just quoted: And Nessie continued with this nonsense: I again ask: is this blatant denial of objective reality not a sign of some form of mental impairment?
|
|
Turnagain
โ๏ธ
๐๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐๐
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Aug 28, 2022 17:51:39 GMT
I gotta' admit that Nessie has seemed to have lost the plot on that one. That seems to be a regular occurrence with Nessie and the witnesses to the alleged atrocities at Treblinka. It seems that his belief in the holyhoax has put him 'round the bend.
|
|
|
Post by Ulios on Aug 29, 2022 0:30:26 GMT
Nazgul made the following post prior to reading this thread on Nessie' board. link in response to his somewhat ridiculous assertion when he said the following: You have quote mined. To be able to accurately interpret someone, you need to quote the context. Rajchman is using emotive descriptives, to convey the horror of a grave that caught fire. You have dishonestly missed out he clarified that he was not being literal, when he said "The blood came up to the surface and burned as if it were fuel". You cut that out of the quote you used, to hide that you are misinterpreting him. The reality is that you are the one who has been shown to be suffering from delusions and an inability to comprehend how some people describe things figuratively, not literally. Here is the exact quote from Rajchman's translated work The pdf in the link above is a full download of this book "The last Jew of Treblinka". To be fair to flipper it does have certain religious elements about it. Rajchman is describing magically burning blood. The meaning is quite clear what Rajchmann thinks. This is not an analogy; camp administration do not come to look at analogies, nor gaze in satisfaction at them. Flipper has the elementary skills to comprehend English; I feel BT has a strong case that this poster will accommodate anything that supports a zealot like belief in something; this however is no more nutzoid than intelligent people thinking Jesus walked on water etc. The issue I have is that it is impossible to discuss anything with a person who is divorced from reality enough to accommodate fantastic claims aka nonsense to support a strongly held belief, and then call it "evidence". To be honest this is no different from discussing the impossibilities of creation with a "true believer". The other alternative is that flipper is drinking too much of that Highland Dew the Scots are so renowned for, och aye jock. 
|
|
|
Post by 1clown on Sept 13, 2022 8:07:15 GMT
Observation from the peanut gallery... This idea of Nessie being somehow female, or "feminine", really just seems like an odd hill to die on, especially if you believe that a fake history has been propagated, spread, and stubbornly defended, by an assortment of characters who mostly appear to be male. And if we're talking about celebrities, you'd have to be living under a rock not to see how Donald Trump is like Amber Heard squared with those kind of traits which were categorized as feminine. Not to mention, new-ish research shows how in fact this kind of oblivious confidence may in fact be a trait driven by high testosterone levels. My point is not that men have to inherently be like this, by the way. There are definitely some who are extremely clear minded and willing to admit wrongness.
|
|
nazgul
๐ต๏ธ
๐ฐ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฒ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
Posts: 1,113
|
Post by nazgul on Sept 13, 2022 8:43:30 GMT
My point is not that men have to inherently be like this, by the way. There are definitely some who are extremely clear minded and willing to admit wrongness. Nessie is an ambiguity to the point many have thought multiple users had access to the account (old board); this was verified in the past by conflicted statements. From our point of view Nessie affectionally known as "flipper" is simply a protagonist who will somersault (flip) backwards a thousand times to enhance a personal belief. Nessie has never admitted he was wrong even shown a water vessel with two handles, he thought was a suitcase. I think he lacks integrity.
|
|
|
Post by 1clown on Sept 13, 2022 8:57:29 GMT
My point is not that men have to inherently be like this, by the way. There are definitely some who are extremely clear minded and willing to admit wrongness. Nessie is an ambiguity to the point many have thought multiple users had access to the account (old board); this was verified in the past by conflicted statements. From our point of view Nessie affectionally known as "flipper" is simply a protagonist who will somersault (flip) backwards a thousand times to enhance a personal belief. Nessie has never admitted he was wrong even shown a water vessel with two handles, he thought was a suitcase. I think he lacks integrity. I've seen some of it. It isn't great. I wonder if it could be people similar to the Holocaust Controversies folks, who partially use the board more as a sounding board so they can waterproof their own narratives from glaring holes.
|
|
nazgul
๐ต๏ธ
๐ฐ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฒ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
Posts: 1,113
|
Post by nazgul on Sept 13, 2022 9:12:03 GMT
I've seen some of it. It isn't great. I wonder if it could be people similar to the Holocaust Controversies folks, who partially use the board more as a sounding board so they can waterproof their own narratives from glaring holes. This seems to be the case. I wish that Nessie would aspire to have an interest in other historical matters without the monotonous repetition. It seems they use the new thoughts here and perhaps elsewhere to cover more tracks of a perceived past and their own iniquities; they have many. The aims of many members here is to discuss reality not fiction.
|
|
Agandaur
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ญ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ข๐๐ง
Posts: 133
|
Post by Agandaur on Sept 22, 2022 5:15:07 GMT
I just had a look at his last comments and had a feeling of passing into some labyrinthine, logic-defying realm that, once entered, is hard to get out of should I participate. I did not comment.
|
|
Agandaur
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ญ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ข๐๐ง
Posts: 133
|
Post by Agandaur on Sept 30, 2022 0:50:47 GMT
A term comes to mind, "Holocaust Supremacist"
|
|