|
Post by Turnagain on Jun 4, 2022 20:27:47 GMT
Nessie wrote:
Go to page 474 of her theses. The chart shows that CS-C used GPR to find G-50-G-54. She has two columns for resistivity; high and low and a single column for GPR. For G-50-G54 only the GPR column is checked. If she used both GPR and resistivity she marked the boxes. Page 149 discusses the resistivity array and has nothing about G-50-G-54.
Nessie apparently can't read with comprehension. Page 149 describes the resistivity equipment and makes no mention of G-50-G-54 whatsoever. The chart on page 470 shows features that CS-C observed visually. Page 474 shows that the five pits were found using only GPR and gives their dimensions, 1-2 meters. Nessie is either delusional or reading from a different version of the thesis than he linked to.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Jun 4, 2022 23:26:30 GMT
Nessie is either delusional or reading from a different version of the thesis than he linked to. Uh... the first one. It’s the first one. 🙂
|
|
Nessie
✍️
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿
Posts: 5,772
|
Post by Nessie on Jun 5, 2022 7:51:54 GMT
Nessie wrote: Go to page 474 of her theses. The chart shows that CS-C used GPR to find G-50-G-54. She has two columns for resistivity; high and low and a single column for GPR. For G-50-G54 only the GPR column is checked. If she used both GPR and resistivity she marked the boxes. Page 149 discusses the resistivity array and has nothing about G-50-G-54. Nessie apparently can't read with comprehension. Page 149 describes the resistivity equipment and makes no mention of G-50-G-54 whatsoever. The chart on page 470 shows features that CS-C observed visually. Page 474 shows that the five pits were found using only GPR and gives their dimensions, 1-2 meters. Nessie is either delusional or reading from a different version of the thesis than he linked to. Read what she said again;
G50 0.2 to depth of survey G51 1m-2m G52 1m to depth of survey G53 1m-2m G54 1.5m to depth of survey
Note, "depth of survey". She clarifies that means deeper than the GPR went when she states "Although the GPR survey was unable to achieve a large enough depth range to determine the full extent of these pits, it is possible to say that they were all deeper than four metres"
Why did the Nazis dig so many large pits at TII, if it was not to bury bodies in, as all the other evidence corroborates.
|
|
|
Post by Turnagain on Jun 5, 2022 8:39:43 GMT
Nessie wrote:
CS-C claimed to have found 5 pits with a maximum of depth of 2 meters using GPR. Resistivity wasn't used. That's made plain by the chart on pg. 474 of her thesis. She then goes on to say, "...it is possible to say that they were all deeper than four metres". Yes, it's "possible" for her to say anything she pleased. If she meant that she had measured the pits as being deeper than 4 meters, how did she do that? Divining rods? It for damn sure wasn't electrical resistivity.
If she had found pits that were over 4 meters deep what was the 1-2 meters from the GPR about? If she could determine that the pits were over 4 meters deep why couldn't she determine their actual depth? Her statement makes it rather obvious that although she found some 1-2 meter deep pits using GPR she's claiming that it was "possible" that the pits "could have" been deeper. It also explains why she refused to publish the GPR profiles.
Of course we have her map outlines showing irregularly shaped pits and her claim that 4 of the 5 pits were rectangular. Your statement that you don't know why that is isn't an explanation for those opposing data.
|
|
Nessie
✍️
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿
Posts: 5,772
|
Post by Nessie on Jun 5, 2022 13:44:09 GMT
Nessie wrote: CS-C claimed to have found 5 pits with a maximum of depth of 2 meters using GPR. G50, 52 and 54 are deeper than 2m. I don't know, like you, I lack experience of archaeological and geophysical work. Because they went deeper than the GPR can go. She said "Although the GPR survey was unable to achieve a large enough depth range to determine the full extent of these pits, it is possible to say that they were all deeper than four metres". You lied. The pits are rectangular in overall dimension, but have uneven sides, which would be consistent with digging into them to get bodies and grave robbing.
You are still weasel dodging that the Nazis were doing a lot of digging at TII.
|
|
|
Post by Turnagain on Jun 5, 2022 14:18:47 GMT
CS-C hides behind jargon along with hiding the GPR profiles. Then we have your mindless, "digging into them to get bodies". That's almost as silly as your "rectangular in overall dimension". CS-C's claims for T-II is dubious at best and her promise to return to T-II for further research turned out to be a bald faced lie. Her refusal to show the GPR profiles is better evidence of chicanery than her ambiguous claims of pits and her handful of tiny unidentified bone shards are evidence of mass murder.
|
|
Nessie
✍️
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿
Posts: 5,772
|
Post by Nessie on Jun 6, 2022 8:27:46 GMT
CS-C hides behind jargon along with hiding the GPR profiles. You lack the training to understand. If a pit is 50m by 25m it is rectangular. If that pits is dug into to get bodies, and then there is grave robbing, then it will end up with irregular edges. Quote her saying she will return. Prove she is refusing to post the GPR, or is it there are so many that they cannot all go in her thesis? Huge pits are proven and you are weasel dodging that.
|
|
|
Post by Turnagain on Jun 6, 2022 9:02:08 GMT
Nessie wrote:
What the hell does that have to do with the Germans enlarging the graves to supposedly exhume the cadavers? A half meter of top cover for the graves would be only 750 cubic meters of ex leaving 17,250 cubic meters of ex in the stockpile. Beyond removing the top cover why would the Germans "dig out" the graves even further?
Nessie stamps his feet and shrieks, "There ARE pits! There are!".
|
|