Turnagain
✂️
𝗛𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘂𝘀
Posts: 1,558
Member is Online
|
Post by Turnagain on Jun 2, 2022 9:30:38 GMT
I'll believe CS-C when she publishes her complete GPR scans of the area. She claims to have made them so let's see them.
|
|
Nessie
🦕
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 (Nessies forum)
Posts: 3,216
Member is Online
|
Post by Nessie on Jun 2, 2022 9:44:38 GMT
I'll believe CS-C when she publishes her complete GPR scans of the area. She claims to have made them so let's see them. Why not write to Staffs Uni and ask for all the scan results? Or would that mean you having to do some work and you cannot be bothered, because you have seen some scans in her report and you cannot read them anyway!
Meanwhile, I will just remind you that you have no evidence they did not dig large pits at TII.
|
|
Turnagain
✂️
𝗛𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘂𝘀
Posts: 1,558
Member is Online
|
Post by Turnagain on Jun 2, 2022 10:12:53 GMT
Uh-huh, CS-C claims to have found some irregularly shaped holes and Nessie is apparently claiming that Jews were buried in them. That's after they were gassed in hermetically sealed gas chambers. Then they were exhumed with a clamshell and cremated on a raised grate with some twigs for fuel. At any rate the cadavers cremated themselves and the cremains were beaten and sifted as fine as cigarette ash and thrown back in the irregularly shaped holes. What could be more reasonable than that?
|
|
Nessie
🦕
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 (Nessies forum)
Posts: 3,216
Member is Online
|
Post by Nessie on Jun 2, 2022 10:52:02 GMT
Uh-huh, CS-C claims to have found some irregularly shaped holes and Nessie is apparently claiming that Jews were buried in them. That's after they were gassed in hermetically sealed gas chambers. Then they were exhumed with a clamshell and cremated on a raised grate with some twigs for fuel. At any rate the cadavers cremated themselves and the cremains were beaten and sifted as fine as cigarette ash and thrown back in the irregularly shaped holes. What could be more reasonable than that? Where do you get they are "irregular shaped holes"? Is it because of the way the grave sites are roughly marked on the aerial photo? She describes many pits that she found as rectilinear, meaning straight lines and one of the pits as "with a ramp at the west end and a vertical edge to the east". The dimensions are rectangular. They will not be perfect outlines any more, as they were dug into and the site grave robbed. But they were no just irregular holes, there were large, rectangular pits.
Gassing people in gas chambers sealed so they would not leak and then preventing a body count by exhuming the bodies with an unknown model of excavator and cremating them on the most efficient form of pyre, is perfectly reasonable.
|
|
Turnagain
✂️
𝗛𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘂𝘀
Posts: 1,558
Member is Online
|
Post by Turnagain on Jun 2, 2022 12:03:58 GMT
Rectilinear IS NOT synonymous with "rectangular". How many times does it have to be defined for you. It is an irregular shaped figure with right angles. What can't you understand about that? If she had found any rectangular prisms she would have shouted it from the roof tops. "I found a rectangular pit that was approximately 25 meters wide and at least 4 meters deep that extended under the investigatory barriers" and so on.
If the graves were "dug into" then they would be larger than the 25-30 meter wide graves claimed by Wiernik and Rajchman. CS-C didn't find any pits that even approached that size. You can piss and moan about it from now til forever but CS-C didn't find any graves as described by multiple so-called eyewitnesses.
Nessie wrote:
Gassing people in hermetically sealed gas/vacuum chambers, burying them in mass graves, exhuming them with a clamshell and cremating them by means of magic is bullsh!t.
|
|
Nessie
🦕
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 (Nessies forum)
Posts: 3,216
Member is Online
|
Post by Nessie on Jun 2, 2022 12:25:34 GMT
Rectilinear IS NOT synonymous with "rectangular". How many times does it have to be defined for you. It is an irregular shaped figure with right angles. What can't you understand about that? The pits are all described as being longer than they are wide, which makes them rectangular. She described pits as rectilinear. If it has straight edges and is say, 25m by 50m, it is reasonable for it to be described as rectangular. etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/3531/1/SturdyColls12PhD.pdf"The feature is also visible in an area containing a rectangular area of ground disturbance" "Rectangular 25 (x) 19 (x) 0.47m – depth of survey. Probable pit. Probably extends under the monument" There are numerous other references to rectangular pits in her report. You always forget that the memorial covers most of the site and the survey only covered a small area around it. So, there is ample space for the pits to be larger that geophysics found. No it is not, it is perfectly possible for the Nazis to have done that. Only you think a gas chambers would not work if it has hermetic sealing. Only you think large pits could not be dug. Only you think pyres using grates cannot work.
|
|
Turnagain
✂️
𝗛𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘂𝘀
Posts: 1,558
Member is Online
|
Post by Turnagain on Jun 2, 2022 21:45:19 GMT
Nessie wrote:
Once again, Nessie declares that the rules of trigonometry don't apply to the holyhoax.
None of CS-C's pits are described as a rectangle. Then we have a "feature" that is ".47 meters deep". What is that "feature"? A building foundation? If the pits and "features" extend under the investigatory barrier why doesn't CS-C confirm that with GPR? Concrete is no barrier to GPR impulses so why didn't she show some short surveys that were perpendicular to a line extending from the pit? Oh, that's right, CS-C's "findings" are sacrosanct and not to be questioned. Well, at least to Nessie.
So, we're back to, "The ever so clever but eeevul Narzis knew how to get 'er done". No such thing as an impossibility with the eeevul Narzis around.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Jun 2, 2022 21:55:20 GMT
Nessie wrote: Once again, Nessie declares that the rules of trigonometry don't apply to the holyhoax. 🤣😅👍 Seriously, Turnagain, do you really think this person is approaching the H-narrative in a sane way?
|
|
Turnagain
✂️
𝗛𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘂𝘀
Posts: 1,558
Member is Online
|
Post by Turnagain on Jun 2, 2022 23:05:43 GMT
been-there wrote:
I'm not a clinical psychologist so I'm not qualified to say whether or not Nessie is sane. I was married to a psychologist but I don't think that is a qualification for diagnosing someone's sanity. I picked up some of the jargon, though.
Nessie seems to have a very rigid personality and is fanatical in his defense of the holyhoax. That fanaticism extends to denying reality such as the rules of trigonometry. That isn't an unusual phenomena. We currently have people who claim to be able to switch their gender at will in complete disregard of genetics. I don't think that either Nessie or the gender-benders can be judged insane on the basis of their fanatical beliefs. History is rife with the harmless (and not so harmless) looney-toonz and nutzoids where most people consider them to be ding-a-lings but not clinically delusional and insane.
I think that "disturbed" would be the harshest assessment I would put on Nessie. He's not like one fellow I knew who declared himself to be Jesus Christ and to prove it, took off his clothes and walked naked down the middle of main street in the town we lived.
|
|
Nessie
🦕
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 (Nessies forum)
Posts: 3,216
Member is Online
|
Post by Nessie on Jun 3, 2022 8:34:33 GMT
Nessie wrote: Once again, Nessie declares that the rules of trigonometry don't apply to the holyhoax. None of CS-C's pits are described as a rectangle. Then we have a "feature" that is ".47 meters deep". What is that "feature"? A building foundation? If the pits and "features" extend under the investigatory barrier why doesn't CS-C confirm that with GPR? Concrete is no barrier to GPR impulses so why didn't she show some short surveys that were perpendicular to a line extending from the pit? Oh, that's right, CS-C's "findings" are sacrosanct and not to be questioned. Well, at least to Nessie. I quoted from her report, where she said rectangular pits had been found. A feature is a building, a pit is a pit. GPR was how the pits that extend under the memorial were established. What the witnesses describe is physically possible. Just because you interpret their descriptions in a way to make their claims appear physically impossible, does not then make their claim physically impossible.
|
|