Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,207 
|
Post by Nessie on Feb 13, 2022 20:05:39 GMT
Uh-huh, the Koherr report corroborates the Hoefle telegram because the Hoefle telegram corroborates the Koherr report. Idiot. They do corroborate each other, as do all the other documents about mass transports to TII. You lied that there were no documents and you do not have the decency to apologise for lying. |
|
Turnagain
โ๏ธ
๐๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐๐
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Feb 13, 2022 20:11:53 GMT
The Hoefle telegram is suspect and isn't corroborated by the Koherr report. An original copy of the intercept would either confirm the Hoefle telegram as authentic or prove it to be fraudulent like the Stroop report.
|
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,207
|
Post by Nessie on Feb 13, 2022 20:15:18 GMT
The Hoefle telegram is suspect and isn't corroborated by the Koherr report. An original copy of the intercept would either confirm the Hoefle telegram as authentic or prove it to be fraudulent like the Stroop report. The Hofle Telegram and Korherr report contain the same total and are both about mass transports to camps in the General Government. They corroborate each other, as do all the other documents about mass transports to those camps. |
|
Turnagain
โ๏ธ
๐๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐๐
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Feb 13, 2022 20:36:55 GMT
No shit? The Koherr report and the Hoefle telegram have almost the same numbers? Geez, whoda' thunk it?
|
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,207
|
Post by Nessie on Feb 24, 2022 14:46:56 GMT
Been-there is lying and makes the following claim rodoh.info/post/4429/threadWitnesses describe mass gassings, corroborated by the documentary evidence of mass arrivals, the circumstantial evidence of the mass theft of property, the remains of buildings where witnesses said gas chambers were located, the archaeological evidence of mass graves and buried cremated remains and the circumstantial evidence of no mass departures from the camps. Logically piece the corroborating evidence together and the only rational conclusion is they were gassed. |
|
mrolonzo
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ญ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ข๐๐ง
Posts: 869
|
Post by mrolonzo on Mar 15, 2022 21:18:23 GMT
Been-there is lying and makes the following claim rodoh.info/post/4429/threadWitnesses describe mass gassings, corroborated by the documentary evidence of mass arrivals, the circumstantial evidence of the mass theft of property, the remains of buildings where witnesses said gas chambers were located, the archaeological evidence of mass graves and buried cremated remains and the circumstantial evidence of no mass departures from the camps. Logically piece the corroborating evidence together and the only rational conclusion is they were gassed. All the corroboration goes in the other direction. |
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,207
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 19, 2022 11:26:09 GMT
None of the people listed have produced evidence that proves what did happen instead of mass gassings at the AR camps or A-B Kremas. Instead, they produce misinterpretaed evidence, argument and opinion, often dressed as evidence, which is not accepted by academics.
|
|
|
|
Post by ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐๐ด๐ป๐ธ on Apr 19, 2022 11:30:53 GMT
None of the people listed have produced evidence that proves what did happen instead of mass gassings at the AR camps or A-B Kremas. Instead, they produce misinterpretaed evidence, argument and opinion, often dressed as evidence, which is not accepted by academics. The information given by others suggests another story than the one you think and believe is the truth. No one cares here what the academics think, people can decide for themselves, not what they are told to think. Most of the academics involved in this field are far from impartial, which is why they are put aside. |
|
|
|
Post by ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐๐ด๐ป๐ธ on Apr 19, 2022 11:36:28 GMT
They do not prevent EVIDENCED claims. If someone found evidence of regular mass transports of hundreds of thousands of people back out of TII, that EVIDENCE would not be illegal. If that evidence pointed to the fact that gassings did not take place, that would be holocaust denial and illegal. Only investigation that supports the murders is allowed. |
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,207
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 19, 2022 11:50:26 GMT
None of the people listed have produced evidence that proves what did happen instead of mass gassings at the AR camps or A-B Kremas. Instead, they produce misinterpretaed evidence, argument and opinion, often dressed as evidence, which is not accepted by academics. The information given by others suggests another story than the one you think and believe is the truth. No one cares here what the academics think, people can decide for themselves, not what they are told to think. Most of the academics involved in this field are far from impartial, which is why they are put aside. They have fallen foul of denial laws, because their claims are not evidenced by any normal standard of evidence and they rely on illogical arguments. |
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,207
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 19, 2022 11:52:21 GMT
They do not prevent EVIDENCED claims. If someone found evidence of regular mass transports of hundreds of thousands of people back out of TII, that EVIDENCE would not be illegal. If that evidence pointed to the fact that gassings did not take place, that would be holocaust denial and illegal. Only investigation that supports the murders is allowed. That is not true, evidence has been produced that debunked claims of mass gassing at various places, best known is Dachau, and that has not fallen foul of denial laws.
|
|
|
|
Post by ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐๐ด๐ป๐ธ on Apr 19, 2022 12:07:47 GMT
That is not true, evidence has been produced that debunked claims of mass gassing at various places, best known is Dachau, and that has not fallen foul of denial laws. Dr Larsen said: This finding was presented in 1945. Holocaust denial laws were enacted in West Germany in 1984 some 40 years later. How could his findings fall foul of denial laws 40 years before they were concocted by Jews. |
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,207
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 20, 2022 12:32:32 GMT
Another example of a lie that there is no evidence; rodoh.info/post/6842/threadBeen-there cherry picks a quote "But when you look for physical evidence THERE IS NOTHING there!" about visiting TII, but ignores that the speaker, Ephraim Kaye from Yad Vashem, goes on to make it clear that there is no evidence to see because the Nazis did so much to hide or destroy that evidence. Hence a visitor to TII will not see gas chambers, or marked mass graves or cremated remains. |
|
Turnagain
โ๏ธ
๐๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐๐
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Apr 20, 2022 13:28:52 GMT
Nessie wrote:
I actually said that I wasn't going to search for a quote from CS-C stating that she intended to return to Treblinka to definitely locate the graves so dropped it from my quotes from CS-C. She DID say that she hoped, "...to return to the site later on this year" but that never materialized. Nessie is now claiming that I misquote CS-C in every one of CS-C's statement. Nessie is hanging on to that lie like snot on a fingernail.
It's a relatively simple task to add up the areas of the graves supposedly found by CS-C and calculate the average depth for the pits to be able to accommodate 700,000+ cadavers. Of course that's beyond Nessie's math capabilities so he simply screeches, "They were big, BIG pits". At even eight (8) cadavers per cubic meter it's going to take at least 89,134 cubic meters of grave volume plus the .5 meter or more of top cover. As far as Nessie is concerned, "BIG pits is graves, so there!". Nessie doesn't have to do no steenkin' calculations to know that CS-C's alleged pits are the graves for over 713,555 cadavers.
|
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,207
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 20, 2022 15:11:29 GMT
He is at it again, rodoh.info/post/6847/thread"Because what has become known since the 1970s as โthe holocaustโ is in reality a pseudo-historical narrative that only claims an attempted genocide of ALL Jews by mass muder via poisonous gas. The REALITY though is that it has no credible evidence supporting it. As was admitted in the above linked talk by a supposed expert, Ephraim Yale." Repeatedly asserting there is no evidence, is one way deniers condition their brains to believe in a massive conspiracy, that is physically impossible to have achieved and an alternative history that genuinely and truthfully does not have any evidence to support it. |
|
