Thread bump, for been-there, to deal with this point; you are dodging that scale of theft was due to the Nazis never expecting to see the Jews again, which fits in with the mass murder evidence. That is why you censor that part of the debate by cutting it out of all your replies to me.
I do not focus on credentials. Maybe I'm a rocket scientist, maybe I deliver pizzas. Why does it matter? I will tell you that I have taken several university-level math courses that covered logic and mathematical proofs. What is your training in logic?
I did a year course at university in general philosophy, which included a part on logical fallacies, which explains why I often refer to such when debating deniers.
Nessie is almost certainly lying. She/he only started referring to logical fallacies AFTER I exposed the standard illogicality of holyhoax true-believer arguments rely on the following logically fallacious arguments: 1.) ad hominem (e.g. deflecting from actual points of debate by attacking the person as a ’neo-nazi’, ’anti-semite’, Hitler-lover’, denier’, etc. 2.) strawman (e.g. arguing ”the Holocaust did happen and only deniers argue it didn’t” (without defining what ’the holocaust’ is nor what is supposedly being ’denied’ as a response to valid questions and informed skepticism. 3. ’begging the question’ (e.g. starting any argument about the details from the unproven position that the holocaust narrative is true and accurate in ALL particulars). Etc., etc.
NESSIE illogically opined: ...you have repeatedly ignored and the difference between credibility and truthfulness. Do you understand that Wiernik may lack credibility, but he can still be truthful? Do you understand that someone can be credible and a liar? Do you understand that corroboration is the best test of truthfulness?
This is standard Nessie illogicality and idiocy. Making it extremely unlikely this person had any University education.
Please send comments or concerns to my e-mail with the word " RODOH " in the subjectline ([email protected])