Post by ๐๐๐จ๐ญ๐ญ on May 4, 2022 1:57:44 GMT
Hot off the podcast! Jim Rizoli has just interviewed Germar Rudolf.
In a thread at the General section of the Lounge of this discussion forum, called Jim Rizoli breaks with "crook" Fred Leuchter โ Oh Nooo, I announced that podcasters Jim Rizoli and Diane King have recently split with Revisionist "Pope" Fred Leuchter over the latter's apparent dishonesty in taking money from sympathetic Revisionists and then not paying it back as agreed.
Mr. Fred A. Leuchter is a Revisionist icon because he was commissioned in 1988 by the late Professor Robert Faurisson (1929-2018) to conduct some extremely important forensic tests at the alleged homicidal gas-chambers at the Nazi concentration camps of Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdanek โ then in Communist Poland โ to assist the defense of German-Canadian publisher Ernst Zรผndel in his second trial in Toronto for "publishing false news," specifically re-publishing the 1974 pamphlet Did Six Million Really Die? by Richard Harwood, aka Richard Verrall of the British National Party.
Jim and Diane have previously been staunch supporters of Mr. Leuchter who had once been an expert on American execution hardware but misrepresented himself as an "Engineer" despite not having any academic or Professional Engineer (PE) credentials. The Revisionist Columbia-educated Engineer Fritz Berg (1943-2019) had long criticized Mr. Leuchter about this and disputing various mistakes in Leuchter's reasoning in his monumental investigation โ but instead of recognizing this and cooperating with the true mission of Revisionism to be one of "bringing History into accord with facts," Mr. Leuchter and Professor Faurisson only doubled down on their errors. The late Mr. Berg found this incredibly frustrating.
In light of the new controversy, Mr. Rizoli has just interviewed another Revisionist icon, Mr. Germar Rudolf, a degreed Chemist and former Ph.D. candidate of the Max Planck Institute who discusses the "Leuchter Report controversy" in detail.
In the interview, Mr. Rudolf has some remarks about publishing Revisionist books in the present, and he also discusses some opinions about the current war with Russia in Ukraine. Then he discusses (at minute 41:00) the Leuchter authorship controversy.
Some takeaways from this recent Jim Rizoli interview of Germar Rudolf ...
The "Leuchter Report" was was not written by someone with technical qualifications โ and Mr. Rudolf has gone through it carefully, not only doing some of his own rigorous forensic testing in the 1995 (and subsequent editions) of the Rudolf Report but issuing his own "Critical Edition" of the four published editions of the "Leuchter Report" with his technically-qualified comments in the notes.
Therefore, Germar Rudolf's The Leuchter Reports: "Critical Edition" (with Robert Faurisson, Fred A. Leuchter and Germar Rudolf) is the only version of the "Leuchter Report" that I recommend.
The original 1988 historical Leuchter Report has numerous flaws made my Leuchter and Faurisson such as with the explosivity of hydrogen cyanide gas, wherein the author(s) did not understand their own reference data cited from DuPont that gives the HCN upper and lower explosive concentration thresholds.
To what extent the original 1988 Leuchter Report was written by Faurisson or Leuchter we will never know, but this is merely an historical or academic question as the Revisionist scholarship has moved on. I think this is a long overdue clarification, however, of a problem that the Revisionist Engineer Fritz Berg never got a satisfactory answer to in his lifetime.
I highly commend Mr. Rudolf and Mr. Rizoli for their diplomacy and earnest efforts here at sorting the truth. History is an important subject, and nobody gets to be "the Pope" without being subject to question.
I would encourage everyone to have a listen to this new Rizoli-Rudolf interview below.
In a thread at the General section of the Lounge of this discussion forum, called Jim Rizoli breaks with "crook" Fred Leuchter โ Oh Nooo, I announced that podcasters Jim Rizoli and Diane King have recently split with Revisionist "Pope" Fred Leuchter over the latter's apparent dishonesty in taking money from sympathetic Revisionists and then not paying it back as agreed.
Mr. Fred A. Leuchter is a Revisionist icon because he was commissioned in 1988 by the late Professor Robert Faurisson (1929-2018) to conduct some extremely important forensic tests at the alleged homicidal gas-chambers at the Nazi concentration camps of Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdanek โ then in Communist Poland โ to assist the defense of German-Canadian publisher Ernst Zรผndel in his second trial in Toronto for "publishing false news," specifically re-publishing the 1974 pamphlet Did Six Million Really Die? by Richard Harwood, aka Richard Verrall of the British National Party.
Jim and Diane have previously been staunch supporters of Mr. Leuchter who had once been an expert on American execution hardware but misrepresented himself as an "Engineer" despite not having any academic or Professional Engineer (PE) credentials. The Revisionist Columbia-educated Engineer Fritz Berg (1943-2019) had long criticized Mr. Leuchter about this and disputing various mistakes in Leuchter's reasoning in his monumental investigation โ but instead of recognizing this and cooperating with the true mission of Revisionism to be one of "bringing History into accord with facts," Mr. Leuchter and Professor Faurisson only doubled down on their errors. The late Mr. Berg found this incredibly frustrating.
In light of the new controversy, Mr. Rizoli has just interviewed another Revisionist icon, Mr. Germar Rudolf, a degreed Chemist and former Ph.D. candidate of the Max Planck Institute who discusses the "Leuchter Report controversy" in detail.
In the interview, Mr. Rudolf has some remarks about publishing Revisionist books in the present, and he also discusses some opinions about the current war with Russia in Ukraine. Then he discusses (at minute 41:00) the Leuchter authorship controversy.
Some takeaways from this recent Jim Rizoli interview of Germar Rudolf ...
The "Leuchter Report" was was not written by someone with technical qualifications โ and Mr. Rudolf has gone through it carefully, not only doing some of his own rigorous forensic testing in the 1995 (and subsequent editions) of the Rudolf Report but issuing his own "Critical Edition" of the four published editions of the "Leuchter Report" with his technically-qualified comments in the notes.
Therefore, Germar Rudolf's The Leuchter Reports: "Critical Edition" (with Robert Faurisson, Fred A. Leuchter and Germar Rudolf) is the only version of the "Leuchter Report" that I recommend.
The original 1988 historical Leuchter Report has numerous flaws made my Leuchter and Faurisson such as with the explosivity of hydrogen cyanide gas, wherein the author(s) did not understand their own reference data cited from DuPont that gives the HCN upper and lower explosive concentration thresholds.
To what extent the original 1988 Leuchter Report was written by Faurisson or Leuchter we will never know, but this is merely an historical or academic question as the Revisionist scholarship has moved on. I think this is a long overdue clarification, however, of a problem that the Revisionist Engineer Fritz Berg never got a satisfactory answer to in his lifetime.
I highly commend Mr. Rudolf and Mr. Rizoli for their diplomacy and earnest efforts here at sorting the truth. History is an important subject, and nobody gets to be "the Pope" without being subject to question.
I would encourage everyone to have a listen to this new Rizoli-Rudolf interview below.
Beginning at timestamp 41:00, a candid Mr. Rudolf is asked about the "Leuchter Report."
www.bitchute.com/video/U1aSRYMhndUQ/
www.bitchute.com/video/U1aSRYMhndUQ/
