Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,206 
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 28, 2022 11:15:25 GMT
This thread is to discuss plagiarism and why some here think it is acceptable to copy from other sources without correct acknowledgement. Plagiarism comes in various forms; www.ox.ac.uk/students/academic/guidance/skills/plagiarism"Verbatim (word for word) quotation without clear acknowledgement Quotations must always be identified as such by the use of either quotation marks or indentation, and with full referencing of the sources cited. It must always be apparent to the reader which parts are your own independent work and where you have drawn on someone elseโs ideas and language. Cutting and pasting from the Internet without clear acknowledgement Information derived from the Internet must be adequately referenced and included in the bibliography. It is important to evaluate carefully all material found on the Internet, as it is less likely to have been through the same process of scholarly peer review as published sources. Paraphrasing Paraphrasing the work of others by altering a few words and changing their order, or by closely following the structure of their argument, is plagiarism if you do not give due acknowledgement to the author whose work you are using. A passing reference to the original author in your own text may not be enough; you must ensure that you do not create the misleading impression that the paraphrased wording or the sequence of ideas are entirely your own. It is better to write a brief summary of the authorโs overall argument in your own words, indicating that you are doing so, than to paraphrase particular sections of his or her writing. This will ensure you have a genuine grasp of the argument and will avoid the difficulty of paraphrasing without plagiarising. You must also properly attribute all material you derive from lectures."
|
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,206
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 29, 2022 16:20:35 GMT
An example of plagiarism. From a post about witness evidence;
"The Museum published it in installments from 1958-1963. Revised and expanded editions, including an English version, were published in the USA and Canada in 1999."
That has been copied and edited, without any accreditation, from this source;
"The Museum published her chronicle in installments in 1958-1963, in its Zeszyty Oลwiฤcimskie [Auschwitz Review] series. Revised and expanded editions included the 1989 German version, Kalendarium der Ereignisse im Konzentrationslager Auschwitz-Birkenau 1939-1945, the English version Auschwitz Chronicle 1939-1945, published in the USA and Canada in 1999
|
|
mrolonzo
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ญ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ข๐๐ง
Posts: 869
|
Post by mrolonzo on May 5, 2022 7:21:24 GMT
An example of plagiarism. From a post about witness evidence;
"The Museum published it in installments from 1958-1963. Revised and expanded editions, including an English version, were published in the USA and Canada in 1999."
That has been copied and edited, without any accreditation, from this source;
"The Museum published her chronicle in installments in 1958-1963, in its Zeszyty Oลwiฤcimskie [Auschwitz Review] series. Revised and expanded editions included the 1989 German version, Kalendarium der Ereignisse im Konzentrationslager Auschwitz-Birkenau 1939-1945, the English version Auschwitz Chronicle 1939-1945, published in the USA and Canada in 1999
This is less plagiarism than simple reduction of information into more readable form as is appropriate on a discussion board. You may have a point if it was an actual work. Your friends at HC bloggers know all about plagiarism in written works don't they Nessie? |
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,206
|
Post by Nessie on May 5, 2022 7:52:29 GMT
An example of plagiarism. From a post about witness evidence;
"The Museum published it in installments from 1958-1963. Revised and expanded editions, including an English version, were published in the USA and Canada in 1999."
That has been copied and edited, without any accreditation, from this source;
"The Museum published her chronicle in installments in 1958-1963, in its Zeszyty Oลwiฤcimskie [Auschwitz Review] series. Revised and expanded editions included the 1989 German version, Kalendarium der Ereignisse im Konzentrationslager Auschwitz-Birkenau 1939-1945, the English version Auschwitz Chronicle 1939-1945, published in the USA and Canada in 1999
This is less plagiarism than simple reduction of information into more readable form as is appropriate on a discussion board. You may have a point if it was an actual work. Your friends at HC bloggers know all about plagiarism in written works don't they Nessie? Indeed, there has been claims of plagiarism by historians.
The example above is plagiarism, and it is an example of a lack of intelligence and understanding, since that person has copied another's words.
|
|
|
|
Post by ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐๐ด๐ป๐ธ on May 5, 2022 8:23:00 GMT
I guess "where did they go" is plagiarised from some other troll under some other bridge in some other town.
|
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,206
|
Post by Nessie on May 5, 2022 8:27:21 GMT
I guess "where did they go" is plagiarised from some other troll under some other bridge in some other town. Multiple people asking the same question is not the same as copy an entry from Wikipedia and trying to pass it off as one's own words. |
|
mrolonzo
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ญ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ข๐๐ง
Posts: 869
|
Post by mrolonzo on May 5, 2022 15:19:50 GMT
I guess "where did they go" is plagiarised from some other troll under some other bridge in some other town. Multiple people asking the same question is not the same as copy an entry from Wikipedia and trying to pass it off as one's own words. Right. But it's in no way any sort of big deal and you characterising that way is not a creditable action. |
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,206
|
Post by Nessie on May 5, 2022 15:27:08 GMT
Multiple people asking the same question is not the same as copy an entry from Wikipedia and trying to pass it off as one's own words. Right. But it's in no way any sort of big deal and you characterising that way is not a creditable action. Academically, it is a big deal. No exam can be passed, when it includes plagiarised work. Plagiarism means an instant fail and even disciplinary action. That you are happy with plagiarism means you are happy with the lowest form of intellect. |
|
mrolonzo
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ญ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ข๐๐ง
Posts: 869
|
Post by mrolonzo on May 5, 2022 16:07:54 GMT
Right. But it's in no way any sort of big deal and you characterising that way is not a creditable action. Academically, it is a big deal. No exam can be passed, when it includes plagiarised work. Plagiarism means an instant fail and even disciplinary action. That you are happy with plagiarism means you are happy with the lowest form of intellect. Indeed, but like I said, this isn't meant as academic work, it's a discussion board so that leeway is entirely acceptable. |
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,206
|
Post by Nessie on May 5, 2022 16:13:45 GMT
Academically, it is a big deal. No exam can be passed, when it includes plagiarised work. Plagiarism means an instant fail and even disciplinary action. That you are happy with plagiarism means you are happy with the lowest form of intellect. Indeed, but like I said, this isn't meant as academic work, it's a discussion board so that leeway is entirely acceptable. Thank you for admitting the lowest of standards are acceptable on this forum. That explains a lot about denial. |
|
mrolonzo
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ญ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ข๐๐ง
Posts: 869
|
Post by mrolonzo on May 5, 2022 16:29:40 GMT
Indeed, but like I said, this isn't meant as academic work, it's a discussion board so that leeway is entirely acceptable. Thank you for admitting the lowest of standards are acceptable on this forum. That explains a lot about denial. What are you trying to say Nessie? |
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,206
|
Post by Nessie on May 5, 2022 16:33:01 GMT
Thank you for admitting the lowest of standards are acceptable on this forum. That explains a lot about denial. What are you trying to say Nessie? That Holocaust deniers are stupid, which explains why they fall for the denier hoax. |
|
mrolonzo
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ญ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ข๐๐ง
Posts: 869
|
Post by mrolonzo on May 5, 2022 16:52:24 GMT
What are you trying to say Nessie? That Holocaust deniers are stupid, which explains why they fall for the denier hoax. What? Is that it? Anything else you'd like to say? |
|
|
|
Post by ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐๐ด๐ป๐ธ on May 5, 2022 20:29:45 GMT
Thank you for admitting the lowest of standards are acceptable on this forum. That explains a lot about denial. Meaning "Nessies Board"; the rest of the forum is about history not the holocaust. |
|
|
|
Post by ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐๐ด๐ป๐ธ on May 6, 2022 0:27:39 GMT
Multiple people asking the same question is not the same as copy an entry from Wikipedia and trying to pass it off as one's own words. It seems no one is trying to pass of others work as there own. As Olonzo said, this is a discussion board, not an academic one. It is requested that "considered posts" be given; they are except for your drivel designed to disrupt. You have not made one considered original post yet. With your parroting it must be only for the grace of god that you are still on your high perch [excrement]ting on others. This jew is trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill.  |
|
