Nessie
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,206
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 8, 2022 10:01:24 GMT
There is evidence of mass graves at TII from - every single witness who worked at the camp - All liars with no documentary support You need evidence to prove that all lied and they are supported by physical evidence found during archaeological and geophysical examinations of the site. None of them said it was a dragline he saw, they just refer to excavators or "baggiers", which is evidence of excavations inside TII. IOW, it is evidence of mass graves, which you want to summarily dismiss. His work was of such a low standard than even you have to reject it!
|
|
Turnagain
âď¸
đđźđťđźđżđŽđđđ
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Apr 8, 2022 11:32:59 GMT
Nessie wrote:
It shows the the same as CS-C's one photo of a GPR scan. The only difference is Krege was a revisionist and was rejected and CS-C was a exterminationist and you accept her photo as the truth.
|
|
Nessie
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,206
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 8, 2022 11:39:13 GMT
Nessie wrote: It shows the the same as CS-C's one photo of a GPR scan. The only difference is Krege was a revisionist and was rejected and CS-C was a exterminationist and you accept her photo as the truth. Why did I reject one and not the other?
|
|
Turnagain
âď¸
đđźđťđźđżđŽđđđ
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Apr 8, 2022 11:54:56 GMT
Nessie wrote:
Gee, I wonder why.
|
|
Nessie
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,206
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 8, 2022 12:12:42 GMT
Nessie wrote: Gee, I wonder why. Stop weasel dodging and answer my question. Why do I reject one GPR and not the other?
|
|
Turnagain
âď¸
đđźđťđźđżđŽđđđ
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Apr 8, 2022 12:31:23 GMT
Do ya' mean, "What's my opinion of why you reject Krege and not CS-C"? I'm not psychic like Hilberger said that the Germans were so why don't you just tell us why?
|
|
Nessie
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,206
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 8, 2022 14:06:43 GMT
Do ya' mean, "What's my opinion of why you reject Krege and not CS-C"? I'm not psychic like Hilberger said that the Germans were so why don't you just tell us why? I am sure you know the answer, but you cannot bring yourself to say it, because that would be quite a confession on your part
If someone makes a claim and another makes a counter-claim and there is other evidence to back up the claim, but there is no evidence to back up the counter-claim, which person is correct, the claim or the counter-claim?
|
|
mrolonzo
âď¸
đđđđŤđ˘đđ˘đđ§
Posts: 869
|
Post by mrolonzo on Apr 8, 2022 20:09:32 GMT
Do ya' mean, "What's my opinion of why you reject Krege and not CS-C"? I'm not psychic like Hilberger said that the Germans were so why don't you just tell us why? I am sure you know the answer, but you cannot bring yourself to say it, because that would be quite a confession on your part
If someone makes a claim and another makes a counter-claim and there is other evidence to back up the claim, but there is no evidence to back up the counter-claim, which person is correct, the claim or the counter-claim?
Yes, youre right the answer is obvious. Turnagain could have answered you. I go with the opposite conclusion.
|
|
Turnagain
âď¸
đđźđťđźđżđŽđđđ
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Apr 8, 2022 20:14:39 GMT
So,you must mean the witnesses who claimed to have left Treblinka, sometimes en masse, who said they didn't see anyone get steamed/vacuumed/gassed, buried, exhumed and cremated and reburied while Krege found no mass graves. That kind of evidence?
|
|
mrolonzo
âď¸
đđđđŤđ˘đđ˘đđ§
Posts: 869
|
Post by mrolonzo on Apr 8, 2022 20:15:52 GMT
You need evidence to prove that all lied and they are supported by physical evidence found during archaeological and geophysical examinations of the site. Its already known that the allies were not just asking innocent questions looking for answers, and the lack of bodies and and the supporting documentation proves they lied anyway. Yeah given that there were no excavators there and there were only draglines, its most likely that that is what they meant. Its evidence of no mass graves in fact. This is supported by other gaps and the actual findings in the ground of the AR camps. No its simply that if we cant use it, it would be dishonest to say otherwise. Dishonesty is more the field of hoaxers.
|
|
Nessie
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,206
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 9, 2022 7:54:38 GMT
Well done, so show your evidence of undisturbed ground at TII, which would prove no mass graves had been dug.
|
|
Turnagain
âď¸
đđźđťđźđżđŽđđđ
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Apr 14, 2022 17:31:51 GMT
Disturbed ground doesn't prove that graves were dug by the Germans for the burial of over 700,000 cadavers.
|
|
Nessie
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,206
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 15, 2022 8:33:46 GMT
Disturbed ground doesn't prove that graves were dug by the Germans for the burial of over 700,000 cadavers. Disturbed ground corroborates the evidence that mass graves and extensive grave robbing took place.
|
|
|
Post by Ulios on Apr 15, 2022 8:46:29 GMT
Disturbed ground corroborates the evidence that mass graves and extensive grave robbing took place. How does disturbed ground corroborate mass graves when there are so many other reasons for the disturbance. It is a correlation and nothing to do with a cause.
|
|
Nessie
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,206
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 15, 2022 8:50:37 GMT
Disturbed ground corroborates the evidence that mass graves and extensive grave robbing took place. How does disturbed ground corroborate mass graves when there are so many other reasons for the disturbance. It is a correlation and nothing to do with a cause. Logic. If a witness claims large pits were dug to burying bodies that were exhumed cremated and mixed back into the ground, which was then subjected to mass grave robbing, I would logically expect to find disturbed ground and the remains of pits containing cremated remains. That is what was found.
|
|