Nessie
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,210 
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 5, 2022 14:08:27 GMT
Let's see your aerial photographs that prove beyond any doubt that rectangular graves as described by the alleged eyewitnesses existed at Treblinka. You have been linked to the 1944 aerial photo of TII on multiple occasions, including the OP in this thread!!!! Why are you asking again?  This image makes the rectangular outlines clear; en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treblinka_extermination_camp#/media/File:Treblinka_II_aerial_photo_(1944).jpgNow you have clearly admitted they could have dug large pits, then yes, they could have also been used at other times, not just the clear up at the end. |
|
mrolonzo
âď¸
đđđđŤđ˘đđ˘đđ§
Posts: 869
|
Post by mrolonzo on Apr 5, 2022 15:14:59 GMT
Right so the draglines were the excavators most likely. Different rubbish pits, remains of buildings, some dead people or some moved earth and foilage. Show me your evidence. Here is the list of pits found by geophysics, page 472 to 480
What does each pit contain? Why was it dug?
From CSC herself; No bodies found, bits and pieces of detritus found Given we know a camp did exist, then anything in those pits would be as I said; rubbish, buildings, foilage etc. |
|
Nessie
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 5, 2022 15:34:19 GMT
Show me your evidence. Here is the list of pits found by geophysics, page 472 to 480
What does each pit contain? Why was it dug?
From CSC herself; No bodies found, bits and pieces of detritus found Given we know a camp did exist, then anything in those pits would be as I said; rubbish, buildings, foilage etc. You miss lout that she said "Figure 4.29 shows the locations of all probable burial sites identified through topographic and geophysical survey" See page 208 for Figure 4.29.
|
|
mrolonzo
âď¸
đđđđŤđ˘đđ˘đđ§
Posts: 869
|
Post by mrolonzo on Apr 5, 2022 16:24:44 GMT
From CSC herself; No bodies found, bits and pieces of detritus found Given we know a camp did exist, then anything in those pits would be as I said; rubbish, buildings, foilage etc. You miss lout that she said "Figure 4.29 shows the locations of all probable burial sites identified through topographic and geophysical survey" See page 208 for Figure 4.29.
Right, but her probable assumes extermination happened. And given she's no holocaust expert she has no such assumption to make that anyone should take seriously. So, again, no bodies, leaving only the other possibilities available. |
|
Nessie
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 5, 2022 16:31:45 GMT
You miss lout that she said "Figure 4.29 shows the locations of all probable burial sites identified through topographic and geophysical survey" See page 208 for Figure 4.29.
Right, but her probable assumes extermination happened. And given she's no holocaust expert she has no such assumption to make that anyone should take seriously. So, again, no bodies, leaving only the other possibilities available. Possibilities that should be determined by the evidence, of which you presented none. |
|
Turnagain
âď¸
đđźđťđźđżđŽđđđ
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Apr 5, 2022 18:50:12 GMT
Nessie wrote:
LOL! Are you seriously trying to sell an overlay by WIKIPEDIA on an aerial photograph as PROOF of the homicidal purpose of Treblinka? That's amazingly asinine. I'm not anywhere near that gullible. Giddoutahere!
|
|
Nessie
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 5, 2022 18:56:38 GMT
Nessie wrote: LOL! Are you seriously trying to sell an overlay by WIKIPEDIA on an aerial photograph as PROOF of the homicidal purpose of Treblinka? That's amazingly asinine. I'm not anywhere near that gullible. Giddoutahere! No, you just back to your lying. It is not PROOF, you idiot. Have you still not worked out the difference between proof and evidence?
You asked for an aerial photo, and that was one that highlighted the rectangular outlines.
|
|
Nessie
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 5, 2022 19:01:15 GMT
Aerial image with no overlay here  |
|
Turnagain
âď¸
đđźđťđźđżđŽđđđ
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Apr 5, 2022 19:14:45 GMT
Nessie wrote:
Wikipedia offers it as proof of how the camp was laid out and its purpose and you linked to it so you figure it out. You're offering their proof as your evidence?
Wikipedia highlighted what they called rectangular outlines not what was definitely shown by the aerial photo. Sell such mindless claptrap down the street, Nessie.
|
|
Turnagain
âď¸
đđźđťđźđżđŽđđđ
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Apr 5, 2022 19:17:36 GMT
Nessie wrote:
Which doesn't show any of Wikipedia's fantasy graves or gas chambers.
|
|
Nessie
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 5, 2022 19:21:09 GMT
Nessie wrote: Wikipedia offers it as proof of how the camp was laid out and its purpose and you linked to it so you figure it out. You're offering their proof as your evidence? Wikipedia highlighted what they called rectangular outlines not what was definitely shown by the aerial photo. Sell such mindless claptrap down the street, Nessie. Wikipedia states;
"The 1944 aerial photo of Treblinka II after efforts at "clean-up", or disguising its role as a death camp. The new farmhouse and livestock building are visible to the lower left.[67] The photograph is overlaid with outlines of already-dismantled structures (marked in red/orange). On the left are the SS and Hiwi (Trawniki) guards' living quarters (1), with barracks defined by the surrounding walkways. At the bottom (2) are the railway ramp and unloading platform (centre), marked with the red arrow. The "road to heaven"[68] is marked with a dashed line. The undressing barracks for men and women, surrounded by a solid fence with no view of the outside, are marked with two rectangles. The location of the new, big gas chambers (3) is marked with a large X. The burial pits, dug with a crawler excavator, are marked in light yellow."
It is clearly opinion on what the aerial photo evidence shows, and is not being offered as proof. If you knew the difference, you would understand that.
|
|
Nessie
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 5, 2022 19:24:36 GMT
Nessie wrote: Which doesn't show any of Wikipedia's fantasy graves or gas chambers. What caused the rectangular outlines visible where the Lazarete was located and C S-C found pits? What caused the dug over ground and variation in vegetation in the area where the mass graves were located and again C S-C found a series of large pits? |
|
mrolonzo
âď¸
đđđđŤđ˘đđ˘đđ§
Posts: 869
|
Post by mrolonzo on Apr 5, 2022 19:29:05 GMT
Right, but her probable assumes extermination happened. And given she's no holocaust expert she has no such assumption to make that anyone should take seriously. So, again, no bodies, leaving only the other possibilities available. Possibilities that should be determined by the evidence, of which you presented none. There's no need, CSCs own study confirms it. No bodies found. Probable this and that wont do. |
|
Nessie
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Apr 6, 2022 9:28:31 GMT
Possibilities that should be determined by the evidence, of which you presented none. There's no need, CSCs own study confirms it. No bodies found. Probable this and that wont do. Why were no bodies found? |
|
mrolonzo
âď¸
đđđđŤđ˘đđ˘đđ§
Posts: 869
|
Post by mrolonzo on Apr 6, 2022 17:24:01 GMT
There's no need, CSCs own study confirms it. No bodies found. Probable this and that wont do. Why were no bodies found? Because the few that arrived dead or died there from natural causes were few in number. |
|
