đđđŹđŹđ˘đ
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,125 
|
Post by đđđŹđŹđ˘đ on Mar 22, 2022 17:19:46 GMT
There is a huge difference between seeing no one leaving the camps on foot, occasionally seeing smaller groups leaving on foot and regularly seeing large groups leaving on foot.
You clearly have no evidence, so you are just asking questions, or jaqing off.
Who is doing all this seeing? Witness who lived nearby like Marian Olszuk are completely ignored by jerks like you. Quote Olszuk stating he saw people leaving in trains, or by walking. Faurisson failed to do so. |
|
Turnagain
âď¸
đđźđťđźđżđŽđđđ
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Mar 22, 2022 17:34:26 GMT
Nessie wrote:
Given the political climate of the time, Faurisson was afraid to carry on his interview with Olszuk. He made that quite clear but Nessie ignores that, of course.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ulios on Mar 22, 2022 17:37:27 GMT
Who is doing all this seeing? Witness who lived nearby like Marian Olszuk are completely ignored by jerks like you. Quote Olszuk stating he saw people leaving in trains, or by walking. Faurisson failed to do so. Olszuk never said he saw people arriving either, he was questioned about the camp itself not the transports. |
|
đđđŹđŹđ˘đ
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,125
|
Post by đđđŹđŹđ˘đ on Mar 22, 2022 18:06:27 GMT
Nessie wrote: Given the political climate of the time, Faurisson was afraid to carry on his interview with Olszuk. He made that quite clear but Nessie ignores that, of course. Faurisson had ample time to ask the most crucial question of all; "did you see lots of people leave the camp?". That one question is what he should have started with. If the answer is yes, the gassing claims collapse. If the answer is no, the gassing claims stand. That Faurisson failed to ask that one question proves he is inept at making enquiries with witnesses.
Of course, he may have asked and the answer was no, which since it does not suit his claims, he dishonestly omitted that from his report.
|
|
đđđŹđŹđ˘đ
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,125
|
Post by đđđŹđŹđ˘đ on Mar 22, 2022 18:09:01 GMT
Quote Olszuk stating he saw people leaving in trains, or by walking. Faurisson failed to do so. Olszuk never said he saw people arriving either, he was questioned about the camp itself not the transports. Which is quite an omission. Arrivals and departures are crucial. Why did Faurisson miss that out? Or did he? |
|
|
|
Post by Ulios on Mar 22, 2022 18:25:21 GMT
Which is quite an omission. Arrivals and departures are crucial. Why did Faurisson miss that out? Or did he? Not an omission. I am sure neither men thought some idiot in the future would continue to ramble on about transports to and from a camp which was probably a regular occurance. It had to be, people were coming and going all the time from the quarry camp. The fact that Olszuk saw nothing remotely what is claimed is of pristine importance. |
|
Turnagain
âď¸
đđźđťđźđżđŽđđđ
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Mar 22, 2022 18:42:06 GMT
Nessie claims to be much more intelligent and knowledgeable about how to interview a subject than Faurisson. Faurisson had planned on further interviews with Olszuk but had to curtail them for fear of the communist police. Nessie claims that he "shoulda" known that and "shoulda" asked the Nessie's question first.
|
|
đđđŹđŹđ˘đ
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,125
|
Post by đđđŹđŹđ˘đ on Mar 22, 2022 19:32:29 GMT
Which is quite an omission. Arrivals and departures are crucial. Why did Faurisson miss that out? Or did he? Not an omission. I am sure neither men thought some idiot in the future would continue to ramble on about transports to and from a camp which was probably a regular occurance. It had to be, people were coming and going all the time from the quarry camp. The fact that Olszuk saw nothing remotely what is claimed is of pristine importance. He speaks to screaming, burning and a terrible smell from inside the camp. |
|
đđđŹđŹđ˘đ
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,125
|
Post by đđđŹđŹđ˘đ on Mar 22, 2022 19:34:31 GMT
Nessie claims to be much more intelligent and knowledgeable about how to interview a subject than Faurisson. Faurisson had planned on further interviews with Olszuk but had to curtail them for fear of the communist police. Nessie claims that he "shoulda" known that and "shoulda" asked the Nessie's question first. His number one question should have been, "did you see people leaving the camp?" It is the most important question to ask. That Faurisson failed to do so speaks volumes to his lack of planning of his interviews. Or, more likely he did ask and got the answer he did not want. |
|
Turnagain
âď¸
đđźđťđźđżđŽđđđ
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Mar 22, 2022 20:19:42 GMT
Nessie verifies that he's much more intelligent and knowledgeable than Faurisson. You betcha', Nessie.
|
|
Agandaur
âď¸
đđđđŤđ˘đđ˘đđ§
Posts: 136
|
Post by Agandaur on Mar 22, 2022 20:30:36 GMT
Nessie verifies that he's much more intelligent and knowledgeable than Faurisson. You betcha', Nessie. Nessie has the distinct advantage of several things: - fireside complacency
- hindsight bias
- It is his questions that should have been asked. How stupid of Faurisson.
|
|
đđđŹđŹđ˘đ
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,125
|
Post by đđđŹđŹđ˘đ on Mar 22, 2022 20:46:00 GMT
Nessie verifies that he's much more intelligent and knowledgeable than Faurisson. You betcha', Nessie. Why did he not start with the most important question of all? One minute into his interview and he would have evidence to cast major doubt on the gassing narrative. |
|
đđđŹđŹđ˘đ
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,125
|
Post by đđđŹđŹđ˘đ on Mar 22, 2022 20:48:08 GMT
Nessie verifies that he's much more intelligent and knowledgeable than Faurisson. You betcha', Nessie. Nessie has the distinct advantage of several things: - fireside complacency
- hindsight bias
- It is his questions that should have been asked. How stupid of Faurisson.
Faurrison went to try and gather evidence TII was not a death camp. He failed miserably, because he lacks the relevant training and yes, he was stupid. |
|
Agandaur
âď¸
đđđđŤđ˘đđ˘đđ§
Posts: 136
|
Post by Agandaur on Mar 22, 2022 20:48:13 GMT
Why did he not start with the most important question of all? One minute into his interview and he would have evidence to cast major doubt on the gassing narrative. That question is only all important to you. It has been established that the inmates were trading goods with outsiders, not only in the camp but also on work detail. There was no sign of anything untowards. This speaks more than volumes. |
|
đđđŹđŹđ˘đ
âď¸
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż
Posts: 5,125
|
Post by đđđŹđŹđ˘đ on Mar 22, 2022 20:51:00 GMT
Why did he not start with the most important question of all? One minute into his interview and he would have evidence to cast major doubt on the gassing narrative. That question is only all important to you. It has been established that the inmates were trading goods with outsiders, not only in the camp but also on work detail. There was no sign of anything untowards. This speaks more than volumes. Screaming, burning and a terrible smell. No mention of transports. That is hardly evidence TII was a transit camp. |
|
