Proving lies.

As any genuine investigator, policeman, detective, lawyer or judge KNOWS, witness statements are the LEAST reliable form of ’evidence’.

That is why all witness statements need to be corroborated by other less unreliable proof such as forensic and/or documentary evidence.

That is why even ’confessions’ need to be corroborated.

The problem with the credibility of the holocaust mass-gassing narrative is that it is based almost completely on highly questionable (and often preposterous) ’witness’ testimony. 

The reality is that the witness testimony regarding mass-gassings — at the sites claimed, by the methods claimed, on the scale claimed — in ALL cases is NOT CORROBORATED by the empirical evidence!
NONE of the witness statements are corroborated, on those particular points.
None! Not one. We have been over this many times here at RODOH. 

So any honest investigator instead of asking ’where did they gooooooo, then?’ should be asking ’how can so many people be repeating the same empirically refuted falsehoods?’.

And any genuine, intelligent investigator would not be suggesting ’how can so many people all be lying?’. That would be an extremely stupid response. 

The fact of many people repeating the same empirically refuted falsehoods is partly explained by the mass-gassing mythology being started as a deliberate, black-arts, psy-op, atrocity propaganda.
In other words it was an expertly planned and executed mass-deception. So to ask ’how could so many people be deceived’ is an extremely stupid and naive response.

The British head of this Allied psy-op was a ‘Jew’ of half-German ethnicity. His mother-tongue was German. His education was in Germany. And as a self-identifying ‘Jew’ he had a pathological hatred of ’Germans’ and Germany.
He was not alone in this.
Maybe I should create a list of all the Jews at the time who from their statements, letters and actions showed that they fit in a similar category of Jews with German connections who were filled and motivated by if not hatred, then considerable antipathy.
Off the top of my head, such a list would include Albert Einstein, Lord Lindemann, Samuel Untermyer, Sefton Delmer, Theodore N. Kaufman, etc., etc.

 . . .

So many people repeating the same empirically refuted falsehoods is explained in numerous ways.
Even if we leave out the obvious one that lies were made out of a spirit of vengeance, there are other explanations.

The Solomon Asch experiments in group conformity partly explain it (see above video on that).

Another explanation is the phenomena of creating false memories by suggestion.

Here is an extract from an article on this phenomena and how EASY it is to affect some people with it.


 And here from the same article is an explanation of why people will initially correctly and truthfully deny but later FALSELY confess to wrongdoing.

You said above that the little boy riding to the Moon is physically impossible now you are changing your stance; pehaps the little boys just rose above the clouds and people thought he rode to the Moon.
The shoah morphing would have the little boy after a few changes commading a powerful rocket to the Moon, the witnesses were mistaken about the bike, how stupid of them; it was always a rocket.



This is off topic to this discussion as there is an existing thread on an alleged hoax.

If someone claims a boy cycled his bike to the moon, we know that witness is lying, because it is physically impossible to cycle to the moon. Claims Germans built gas chambers, dug large pits and cremated on pyres are not claims about the physically impossible.

Any building can be a gas chamber, the efficacy depends on the gas; Ypres was a giant gas chamber without walls, with chlorine being the agent; the allies reported 5000 killed and 15 thousand wounded. Large pits can be dug and outdoor cremations happen. However, as unlikely as it is, it is not those claims that are of the "little boy and his trike" standard.

What is equitable is the issue of flammable blood and exothermic corpses, the infinitesimal amout of fuel spoken about in comparison to reality. These blatant fabrications are fictions, which suggest everything the author has said is of similar integrity.

Actually, no. It is on topic. 😀

It is Nessie giving a practical demonstration of how holocaust promulgators attempt to ’prove a lie’ by literally stupid — but amazingly so far succesful — hopelessly irrational ’reasoning’. 🙂

1. Documents showing only train movements of people delusionally becomes ’proof’ of mass-gassings.
2. Architectural drawings of morgues at Birkenau delusionally become records of ’gas chambers’.
3. Buildings demolished by someone (Soviets or Germans, we don’t know for sure) delusionally becomes ’proof’ of hiding ’gas chambers’. 
4. tiny mass-graves of a few bones and an ancient shark tooth becomes ’proof’ of million murdered Jews at Treblinka, plus absence of disturbed earth at Babi Yarr or cremains in pools in Auschwitz is avoided and passed over.
5. Appropriation of wealth prior to forced exile, labour or incarceration delusionally becomes proof of ’genocide’.

It is confirmation bias taken to such an extreme that it became a mass-delusion.
And this is how a lie in the minds of so many deceived believers has been and still is ’proven’. 🤪