|
Post by Turnagain on May 26, 2022 15:06:00 GMT
BINGO! I wrote: .,. Nessie wrote:
Not quite word for word but my imitation of a response by Nessie was spot on. Vrba's rough ground plan was an obvious fiction but Nessie excuses that fantasy by it being accurate about the essentials of a "gas chamber, undressing room and crematoria". Nessie is nothing if not predictable.
|
|
|
Post by Turnagain on May 26, 2022 15:18:44 GMT
Nessie wrote:
The prosecution at the IMT knew that neither Wiernik nor Vrba were believable sources so needed a "confession" from some German in authority. Who better filled that need other than a commandant of Auscwhitz, Hoess? A suitable confession was beaten out of Hoess and Wiernik and Vrba were golden. Hoess' confession was indeed crucial to the holyhoax narrative.
|
|
𝐍𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐞
✍️
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿
Posts: 5,150
|
Post by 𝐍𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐞 on May 26, 2022 15:40:46 GMT
BINGO! I wrote: .,. Nessie wrote: Not quite word for word but my imitation of a response by Nessie was spot on. Vrba's rough ground plan was an obvious fiction but Nessie excuses that fantasy by it being accurate about the essentials of a "gas chamber, undressing room and crematoria". Nessie is nothing if not predictable. If you were asked to draw a rough plan of a building you were never inside, according to you, unless you draw something that is pretty spot on accurate, you are a liar.
|
|
𝐍𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐞
✍️
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿
Posts: 5,150
|
Post by 𝐍𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐞 on May 26, 2022 15:46:14 GMT
Nessie wrote: The prosecution at the IMT knew that neither Wiernik nor Vrba were believable sources so needed a "confession" from some German in authority. Who better filled that need other than a commandant of Auscwhitz, Hoess? A suitable confession was beaten out of Hoess and Wiernik and Vrba were golden. Hoess' confession was indeed crucial to the holyhoax narrative. Along with dozens of other witnesses, both Sonderkommando and Nazi who worked in A-B and Sonderkommando and local Poles for the AR camps, along with the physical evidence of the Nazis trying to hide their crimes at the AR camps and A-B Kremas and Bunkers, along with the Topf & Sons engineers and documents. By the 1960s, there were also Nazis confirming what had happened at the AR camps.
The Nazis, whether under duress or not, confessed to what had happened, because mass gassings was the only thing that was evidenced. If they had claimed something else had happened, they would need to say where the evidence was to back up that claim. Only revisionists believe in what is not evidenced to have happened.
|
|
|
Post by Turnagain on May 27, 2022 5:14:48 GMT
Nessie wrote: That's a good 'un, Nessie. The Germans were forced to confirm the lies of the witnesses so the lies of the witnesses became the truth. To see Doug Christie take apart Vrba's lies like peeling a banana go here: aaargh.vho.org/engl/vrba1.html Vrba is seen to be backing up like bad plumbing and declaring his book to be a "literary" work e.g. a novel; a fictionalized historical work. Christie's cross-examination begins on page three.
What the hell is the matter with that address? It's copied from the address bar at the sight and I get a "not found" response? Have to look into this.
So, it seems that the address of: https.//aaargh.vho.org/engl/vrba1.html has to be typed into the address bar to be effective. One must click on the first entry for that address.
You can also go to: for the complete transcript of the trial. Searching out the Vrba testimony, the Hilberg testimony, etc. is a PITA but is just a matter of endless scrolling.
|
|
𝝥𝝰𝘇𝗴𝝻𝝸
🕵️
𝕲𝖊𝖍𝖊𝖎𝖒𝖕𝖔𝖑𝖎𝖟𝖊𝖎
Posts: 1,408
|
Post by 𝝥𝝰𝘇𝗴𝝻𝝸 on May 27, 2022 9:31:19 GMT
That is because gassings were corroborated by other evidence, where there is no evidence of an alternative use. Instead, there is speculation from various revisionists, who cannot agree between delousing, showering and bomb shelters. Off topic again, there is a thread on gas, use that.
|
|
|
Post by Turnagain on May 27, 2022 10:03:50 GMT
Nessie wrote:
Uh-huh, the witnesses lied about everything except the gassing. That just makes their tales sooooo believable.
|
|
|
Post by Turnagain on May 27, 2022 10:43:17 GMT
Nessie wrote:
No, I DON'T claim that the witnesses told the truth about camp conditions and events at A-B. Wherever did you get that silly-assed notion?
|
|
|
Post by Turnagain on May 27, 2022 10:57:39 GMT
Nessie wrote:
IOW, it was just a silly-assed notion.
|
|
𝝥𝝰𝘇𝗴𝝻𝝸
🕵️
𝕲𝖊𝖍𝖊𝖎𝖒𝖕𝖔𝖑𝖎𝖟𝖊𝖎
Posts: 1,408
|
Post by 𝝥𝝰𝘇𝗴𝝻𝝸 on May 27, 2022 11:02:12 GMT
Off topic again, there is a thread on gas, use that. This thread is about assessing the evidence from Hoess about mass gassings at A-B. Discuss what Hoess said, not your love of mass gasssed jews.
|
|
𝐍𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐞
✍️
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿
Posts: 5,150
|
Post by 𝐍𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐞 on May 27, 2022 11:29:09 GMT
This thread is about assessing the evidence from Hoess about mass gassings at A-B. Discuss what Hoess said, not your love of mass gasssed jews. Hoess said that Jews were gassed at A-B. That claim is corroborated by multiple witnesses, documents, physical and circumstantial evidence, much of which was already known in 1946, so Hoess was not the major reason why the gassings claims were accepted.
|
|
|
Post by Turnagain on May 27, 2022 11:54:04 GMT
Nessie wrote:
That's your opinion. Others believe that Hoess was used to make the lies of the so-called witnesses more palatable. As far as your drivel about "physical and circumstantial evidence" there's plenty of evidence disproving such bunk.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on May 27, 2022 11:57:54 GMT
Anyway. Back to the irreconcilable and self-contradictory timeline of events in the coerced ‘confessions’ of Rudolph Höß that ‘admitted’ involvement in the physically improbable mass-gassing-genocide of millions of ‘Jews’.
|
|
𝐍𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐞
✍️
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿
Posts: 5,150
|
Post by 𝐍𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐞 on May 27, 2022 14:09:35 GMT
Nessie wrote: That's your opinion. Others believe that Hoess was used to make the lies of the so-called witnesses more palatable. As far as your drivel about "physical and circumstantial evidence" there's plenty of evidence disproving such bunk.
It is not my opinion. I have linked to the various trials that happened of A-B camp staff and each one had Nazis admitting to what they did, backed up by evidence. Hoess was the most senior person tried, but there is no evidence from any revisionist, to back up the claim that before Hoess people doubted gassing claims and then after they accepted them. If that was the case, then why were people found guilty at trials before Hoess?
|
|
𝐍𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐞
✍️
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿
Posts: 5,150
|
Post by 𝐍𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐞 on May 27, 2022 14:19:13 GMT
|
|