|
|
Post by jeff8675309 on May 24, 2022 13:15:11 GMT
- This is because he is right most of the time;
No…sorry, gonna go with no with Gibson being right “most of the time.” I’m just gonna delete the paranoid yammering. In fact any more references to “Jude” will simply be deleted. It is off-topic paranoid drooling not worth acknowledging. Except that Hoess said he got the number from the conveniently absent Eichmann meaning he didn’t come up with it on his own. He also didn’t regurgitate the four million Soviet exaggeration. He also said in his memoir (which you lot conveniently ignore) said there were limits to Auschwitz’s destructive capabilities and put the number very close to what the acknowledged number is today. |
|
|
|
Post by Turnagain on May 24, 2022 13:35:06 GMT
Jeff (numbers) wrote:
Jeff is just going to ignore the fact that Hoess was tortured and his family threatened for his so-called confession.
|
|
Nessie
🦕
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 (Nessies forum)
Posts: 3,255
|
Post by Nessie on May 24, 2022 13:43:15 GMT
It was wrong to treat Hoess the way he was treated, but the evidence remains to corroborate his claims about gassings at A-B. Been-there also remains wrong in his claim to his workmate that in 1946, Hoess was the only witness.
|
|
|
|
Post by Turnagain on May 24, 2022 14:48:49 GMT
It was wrong to treat Hoess the way he was treated, but the evidence remains to corroborate his claims about gassings at A-B. Been-there also remains wrong in his claim to his workmate that in 1946, Hoess was the only witness. No, it wasn't "wrong" to torture Hoess for his confession, it was illegal. All confessions obtained under duress are considered null and void in any legal court. Fortunately for the hoaxsters the Nuremberg Tribunals were show trials so didn't have to conform to any legal standards. Chief Justice SCOTUS Harlan Fiske Stone called the Nuremberg Tribunals a "high grade lynching" and a "fraud". There is NO conclusive evidence that corroborates Hoess' so called confession about mass murder at Auschwitz. |
|
Nessie
🦕
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 (Nessies forum)
Posts: 3,255
|
Post by Nessie on May 24, 2022 14:57:38 GMT
It was wrong to treat Hoess the way he was treated, but the evidence remains to corroborate his claims about gassings at A-B. Been-there also remains wrong in his claim to his workmate that in 1946, Hoess was the only witness. No, it wasn't "wrong" to torture Hoess for his confession, it was illegal. Is it not wrong to do something illegal? The Nazi confessions to mass gassings are corroborated by other evidence. |
|
|
|
Post by Turnagain on May 24, 2022 15:10:19 GMT
Nessie wrote:
Your attempt to soft-peddle the fact that Hoess was tortured for a "confession" doesn't fly, Nessie. Lots of things can be considered "wrong" but aren't illegal. Torturing a prisoner for a confession is illegal. There is NO conclusive proof that Auschwitz was an extermination camp. Hoaxsters conveniently forget that there were other confessions obtained under duress. Franz Zeireis confessed to gassing 65,000 prisoners at Mauthausen during the Kaltenbrunner trial.
|
|
Nessie
🦕
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝗮𝗱𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 (Nessies forum)
Posts: 3,255
|
Post by Nessie on May 24, 2022 15:21:06 GMT
Nessie wrote: Your attempt to soft-peddle the fact that Hoess was tortured for a "confession" doesn't fly, Nessie. Lots of things can be considered "wrong" but aren't illegal. Torturing a prisoner for a confession is illegal. There is NO conclusive proof that Auschwitz was an extermination camp. Hoaxsters conveniently forget that there were other confessions obtained under duress. Franz Zeireis confessed to gassing 65,000 prisoners at Mauthausen during the Kaltenbrunner trial. You conveniently forget that I only use witness evidence where there is not evidence of duress, such as the Topf & Sins engineers, who corroborate Hoess that the Kremas were used for mass gassings. There IS conclusive proof A-B was used for mass gassings. |
|
|
|
Post by jeff8675309 on May 24, 2022 15:27:52 GMT
Jeff (numbers) wrote: Jeff is just going to ignore the fact that Hoess was tortured and his family threatened for his so-called confession. Oh no, and Hoess is the only witness and there are no documents to back up what he said!!!! Whatever shall I do?  ? LOL |
|
|
|
Post by Turnagain on May 24, 2022 15:50:10 GMT
Jeff(numbers) wrote:
So, you ARE OK with Hoess being tortured for his confession. Since there's no legal confession, how is it "backed up" with documents? Care to show some stand alone documents that prove that A-B was an extermination facility? That's PROOF, Jeff, not something that you call "evidence".
|
|
|
|
Post by Turnagain on May 24, 2022 15:53:25 GMT
Nessie wrote:
Nessie stamps his feet and shrieks, "There IS conclusive proof, there is, there is". Way to go, Nessie.
|
|
?