The weakest part of the ’holocaust’ — the ’eye-witnesses’

I did an online search for any person presented as an eye witness, to make a point about so many ‘survivors’ being presented to us as eye-witnesses of things they actually did NOT see, and do not KNOW from personal experience.

This was to support the point of how perverse that is that we as a society allow that.
Not only that but how perverse that is to force such misleading visitors upon impressionable school children.

Mietek Grocher was just one example of that racist pervisity. An example that our resident believer didn’t appreciate so tried to move-the-goalposts.
But Mietek is just one example among thousands.
Kitty Hart is another.
Eva Moses Korr is another.
Tobias Rawet is another.
Etc., etc.
There are so many. All encouraged in their old age to tell emotionally shocking stories to the masses, who would never dream to question their authenticity or check.
And that is the WHOLE POINT: compelling personal stories, so that everyone obediently “believes”!
PLUS feels disgust for anyone who applies just a little bit of reason, skepticism, logic and critical thinking.
THAT is the agenda. 

It is one of emotion over reason!
Blind belief over intelligent investigation.

Yet, these people’s testimony of things they never saw it is admitted is the least credible evidence. 

 .. .. .. .. ..

So anyway, I did an online search and the first link I came upon had that quote from Frank Bright.

The fact that the first link had a false claim of seeing a “gas chamber in action” is clearly proof for anyone not blinded by an obstinate need to ‘believe’ that the promoters of this holocaust ”mass-gassing” narrative have no qualms in lying to us to garner more believers.

And that is not peculiar to only this belief. In my experience that is the same in many religions! Emotionally compelling, sensation stories are routinely promoted. The believers need it to keep their faith and commitment to the belief-system alive.

So wevstarted with the clearly fraudulent claims of Mietek Grocher. The point was obfuscated and denied.
Now we have moved on to Frank Bright as another example proving the same point. Again the point is denied.

Er... so, remind me, who are supposed to be the deniers in this discussion? 🤔🙂

It appears that the whole holocaust scenario, at least the gassing part relies on "witness" testimony. there is little else. Now this poster has advised people to "read an evidenced history by a trained acadamic"  only, stuff the stupid untrained survivors. 

It appears that "trained academics" have esoteric, ethereal powers invoking a priori knowledge; grasping the truth out of thin air.

Not only is this an appeal to authority, but most of these "trained" academic of holocaust literature are the alleged victims themselves by nature of their ethnoreligious status.

Many of the survivors do speak the truth; they saw nothing untowards, just fear of the unknown and rumours.

The gas chambers were allegedly morgues, there is no evidence of anything else except outgassing of fumes from corpses as would occur in all morgues. As others have mentioned frequently there are no holes in the remains, that is a fabrication. As Zb was used as a general disinfestation agent it is likely to have residues. However, as Germar stated the residues are no where near the concentration to ensure death within 3 mins as claimed.

Mass arrivals in a a huge camp are nothing when all the witnesses state there were mass departures. The selections were male and female and no doubt a few euthanized. The property would be worth stuff all. Perhaps you are focusing on the location of Irene Zisblatts diamonds again.?

It has been mentioned countless times that Aktion 14f13 the euthanasia program was in operation, for all inmates and not just jews. This was mentioned in the testiminy of Hungarian jüdin Gertrud Deak, she said her invalid mother was separated and never seen again, she showered with thousands of other people from her transport.

It is unlikely euthanized people would leave to work elsewhere considering what happened to them.

Asking for repeats of information. Here is the information from wiki:


This I believe is the source information for your holocaust.

This thread is about eye-witnesses and their testimony.

We just had info about H-survivors who schools allowed to lie to their pupils, even after their reliability and credibility has been exposed.

True-believers don’t want to talk about this. Its an ironic form of genuine denial.

Although I personally feel sympathy for the ’survivor’ most recently discussed, it must surely have been terrible to lose your parents at such a young age.
Yet, we are discussing history here!
So any misleading, removed-from-context, racist stories told, repeated and publicised need to be recognised as such. 

  
1. Frank DID give ”testimony” about things that were NOT ’first-hand’. That is therefore deceptive.
That needs to be recognised and not glossed over out of sympathy.
Nor should ”horrors” be allowed to be exaggerated and emphasised to create a gripping story.  



That is another lie, straight away in the first few seconds.
First because not all those jewish people were ”killed”. Obviously many died from other, unintended causes, e.g. typhus epidemics that guards, kommandants and their family members also died from.
Second, it is a calculated deceit because 6 million ’jews’ did not even die. Raul Hilberg estimated a total of deaths from ALL causes of 5.1 million, and that is also a suspected inflated total. People who survived are included in the total due to being counted multiple times, or because of changing name and/or emigrating, etc., etc.

 

He doesn’t KNOW that. So again that is NOT first-hand testimony of seeing someone go to be murdered by gas. 
And it  is deceitful to have people who lost their parents as children, repeating unfounded rumours AS IF they actually knew and saw something that in reality we KNOW they did not. 
But this is exactly how the holocaust mass-gassing narrative has been presented as truth to millions of people since the 1960s. And it is a deception that any person who values truth and justice should want stopped. Not because they are anti-semites or neo-nazis, but because they value truth and justice! 

 
No you couldn’t. He is repeating a discredited trope. Crematoria DO NOT belch fire. Anyone who knows the history knows this is an anti-German, racist, hate-trope. Yet the BBC (and the Guardian are promoting it!)

 
 Another deceit.