The weakest part of the ’holocaust’ — the ’eye-witnesses’ Apr 18, 2022 23:16:56 GMT been_there and mrolonzo like this
Post by nazgul on Apr 18, 2022 23:16:56 GMT
Which is a meaningless argument you used again and again.
If the witnesses were in the main not "trained insurgents" aka spies, agents, militia, partisans co-ordinated then his claim might have some merit. However, the corroborated evidence is what they created themselves e.g they blew up the Kremas after the Germans left. The transports records mysteriously disappear except the damning ones.
He carries on sprouting his nonsense about the mass gassing of Hungarian Jews at Auschwitz when it is clear from the report that they all showered together by the thousands (a few were euthanized). He demands evidence of mass transports out of various places, when the same reports mentioned above speak of walking, horse and cart and trucks. Sometimes they had to walk to the railways stations.
What is most annoying is not Nessies position that a holocaust occurred; the holocaust is not defined clear enough to say yay or nay. The goalposts keep on moving to suit an agenda at a particular time. We are trying to ascertain what really happened as opposed to blindly accepting the bullshit that Nessie finds compelling.
He is trying to maintain the status quo and sees any concessions as a slippery slope, hence the constant cycling of rhetoric.
I am others read the narrative and when something conflicting comes up alarm bells ring. This is what happened when Peter Lantos reported 3 thousand jews from Hungary were transported West; when Gertrud Deak also a Hungarian jew said she showered with thousands of other woman from her transport. The narrative clearly states that most Hungarian Jews were gassed within hours of arrival at Auschwitz. These truthful witnesses speak a different story to the [excrement] told by some others.