The weakest part of the ’holocaust’ — the ’eye-witnesses’

This topic-thread is about eye-witness testimony.
Attempts are therefore inevitably made by cultish believers attempting to derail discussion of such testimony. This presumably being because they know how detrimental such testimony is to the ahistorical belief-system promulgated under the protected rubric of ’holocaust studies’.

In particular, this topic-thread posits the premise that ’eye-witness’ testimony is not only the least convincing aspect of the allegation of genocide by mass-gassing, but actually refutes that allegation. This being because if the most relied upon ‘eye-witness’ testimony is critically scrutinised and compared with other ‘eye-witness’ testimony, the unreliability of it becomes unavoidably clear.

This fact was demonstrated in the trial brought by the historian David Irving who took Professor Debbie Lipstadt and her publishers Penguin to trial for libel.

Firstly because the lawyers for the defence decided not to call a single ‘eye-witness’ as they knew that to do so would jeopardise their case. That being because the team of lawyers, researchers and mercernary ‘historians’ acknowledged that ‘eye-witness’ testimony was not only worthless as ‘evidence’ in pursuing their case but was in fact damaging to it!

Secondly because the presiding Judge acknowledged that to his great suprise what he had been taught to believe was the ‘overwhelming evidence’ conclusively supporting the claim of a planned genocide by mass-gassing, he discovered in reality does not exist.

This was the point alluded to previously by me:
viz. their is no conclusive ‘evidence’ for any of those holocaust ’articles of faith’.
On the contrary, the documentary evidence is thin and open to interpretation. PLUS, the empirical evidence ACTUALLY refutes the narrative on crucial, core details.

These facts have been proven numerous times on this discussion forum and elsewhere.

They can be gone over again if that is wanted. But may I request moderators make sure it is not done here, as this topic concerns ’eye-witness’ claims.

 ... ... ... ... ...

The irrefutable fact is that there are no credible ‘eye-witnesses’ to claims of mass-gassing on the scale claimed, at the camps claimed, in the numbers claimed.

The resident RODOH cultish believer was many times requested to name one credible ‘eye-witness’ to any mass-gassing of Jews-because-they-were-Jews, and to provide quotes of their testimony plus a verifiable source for it.

He could not! Instead he avoided, prevaricated, obfuscated and attempted to distract from the simple challenge.

If 6 million, 4 million or 2.4 million Jews (take your pick on the total, as there is no accepted figure amongst ‘believers’) were gassed in homicidal chambers, over a period of three years, in numerous locations, you would think it would be a relatively easy thing to reference numerous credible ’eye-witness’ testimonies describing that occurrence.

Yet, as Lipstadt’s team of researchers knew, as her legal team recognised, and as any honest investigator quickly realises — there isn’t one!! Not one.
None of them — not the Kapos, not the Sonderkommandos, not the SS functionaries and camp operatives — provided testimony that withstands close scrutiny on the core details.

If I am wrong on this point, please do correct me. It should be easy to do.
Just provide the one most credible testimony.

Surprise, surprise. 🙂
So, no attempt at providing even one truthful and credible witness to the alleged mass-gassing, supposedly for three years, supposedly at six camps, supposedly of 2.7 million people!!

This is a tacit admission that none of the people who incriminated others as mass-murderous H-war-criminals or incriminated themselves are believable! None of them! Not a single one!
Quite amazing. 🙄

You’d think something like that which the H-narrative alleges, would be so traumatisingly memorable that the vast majority of eye-witnesses would be able to describe it in extremely credible, accurate detail.

We could expect — if the narrative were true — that if not the majority, then at least numerous witnesses would have correctly related the core details in a credible and truthful way. 

And yet, not one did!
Not one credible and truthful ’eye-witness’.
Instead ALL of them non-credible ’lie-witnesses’.

And that folks, is why this pseudo-history needs laws to protect it from critical analysis and honest research.

Yep, one witness describes a dragon with green scales flying from the castle and breathing fire on the peasants. Another witness describes a big green and pink snake flew from the castle to the village and ate thousands of peasants. Nessie says that there are snakes in the rain forests of South America who flatten their bodies and glide through the air from tree to tree so the tales of flying reptiles are "corroborated by other independent evidence". The true account of the gliding rain forest snakes prove that although the witnesses aren't credible they're actually telling the truth. Well, maybe they just used some "emotive language" but their stories are corroborated. Perfectly reasonable.

With the odd exception of the tilt a whirl electrocution chambers, chlorine chambers and steam. All of these are made up as are the Zb nonsense and Carbon Monoxide exhaust nonsense.