Only a gullible fool would believe that someone just by luck/sheer chance came upon a file out of so many recently declassified and unarchived files and just happened to find an intercept and
‘recognised’ it referred to and ‘corroborated’ the racist, anti-German, empirically refuted, holyhoax atrocity-propaganda alleging 4.25 million joos being gassed to death.
What is the likelihood of one such intercept just being randomly discovered out of all the several hundreds of thousands of decrypted intercepts, so soon after they were declassified?
And then only a gullible fool would believe the ‘story’ that no similar communications were ever found ever again. 🤣🤦♂️
A reasonable, rational person would acknowledge that the ’discovery’ was either extremely ’lucky’ and/or extremely unlikely.
A gullible fool or a deceitful moron defending a ludicrous belief-system would not.
As I understand it, the ones who made public the ’discovery’ of it are Peter Witte and Stephen Tyas. Presumably one of them ’found’ it.
But in their publication they don’t mention who found it. Nor do they mention how
— whoever did ‘find’ it — just happened upon this particular intercept amongst the many, many thousands.
This fact alone should make any reasonable person suspicious.
There are 101 archives of files, and each one contains several thousands of decrypted intercepts.
So who found it and how?
But nobody dare question things like this. Most everybody in the world knows nothing about this kind of detail, and so just gullibly and obediently ’believe’ what they are told to believe.
As I stated before, for a historian to publically question in this way would be career-suicide. The only academics and publishing historians who question any of this H-narrative have been ostracised and smeared. Look what happened to Prof Nolte, Prof. Faurisson, Prof Hayward, Roques, Germar Rudolf and David Irving for proof of that.
And the reason is because the whole mass-gassing narrative CAN NOT WITHSTAND CLOSE SCRUTINY!
Just the spelling of the name HOEFLE
in this extreeeeeemely fortunate ‘find’ defies reason for anyone who knows the detail (as has been explained previously)
But online holocaust defenders, Holyhoax true-believers and the general public do not know nor are interested in the details.
Above is the image of the decrypt as it appears in a chapter written by Peter Witte and Stephen Tyas in a part of a study called Holocaust and Genocide Studies, V15 N3, Winter 2001, pp 468-486.
In the notes at the back are some interesting quotes from the interrogations of German PoWs.
They have to do with the use of initial letters for the Aktion Reinhardt camps.
Globocnik's successor in Lublin, Jakob Sporrenburg, apparently said during interrogation that "Globocnik's men would talk about Camp 'S'”
This is supposedly recorded in a report on the interrogation of SS Gruppenfuhrer Jakob Sporrenberg that was carried out in London on February 25th 1946.
The file containing his interrogation is apparently in the PRO, WO 208/4673 166970, folder 14.
In another post-war interrogation at Nuremberg, on November 15th 1945, the prisoner Dieter Wishceny is reported to have stated that in Eichmann's office, the Aktion Reinhardt camps were marked only with their initial letters. But when asked which camp the letter T represented, he curiously gave the answer that T stood for Lublin?!? 😮
But that ‘eye-witness’ evidence doesn’t fit the belief-system, so is ignored by the holyhoax mass-gassing narrative promulators.
That proves that the so-called ‘convergence of evidence’ rhetoric is really cherry-picked details chosen by applying ‘confirmation bias’.
Here is something by an expert who did question the narrative and was targeted, smeared, libelled, persecuted and bankrupted for doing so. He thought the Höfle decrypt looked according to his “own cursory forensic examination of ink, paper, and typewriter” 80% authentic... but...