Illogical arguments - what is actually impossible?

Here we can see that I provided an example of one of Nessie’s many lies.

But in the same post Nessie claims I “as usual provide no evidence” of that.

This is not only another “illogical argument” (the subject matter of this topic-thread), but is yet another deranged denial of simple and basic objective reality.

This and the denial of Rajchman’s claim to have seen blood from the corpses of of 250,000 buried joos burning for 24 hours, demonstrates a profound disconnect from reality.

Something that I suggest is a necessary requirement for anyone who actually studies the evidence for the holocaust mass-gassing hoax, and still insists it to be an accurate history.

Ironically proving that it is holocaust promoters who are:
— the real ‘deniers’
— the ones’s who lie to maintain an irrational belief,
— hold stubbornly to a belief that is not only denial of reality
— but is motivated by ‘hate’ (hate of mythologicalised ‘Nazties’ and anyone who exposes their deranged nonsense).

Wow! Yet another insane reply. 😮

I said that NESSIE regularly lies.
I gave an example of a recent lie she/he wrote regarding Turnagain. The one about Nessie’s false claim that T says there is ”no evidence”.
Nessie didn’t prove it wrong. But claims so.

And now moves the goalposts to something about ”Turnagain does not regularly lie”!!?? 😮🤪

Is there anyone following this who genuinely can’t see that this is a person who it is impossible to have a sane discussion with. 

First of all, one link is not a list.

Secondly, Turnagain did NOT claim “there is no evidence”. So you DID lie when accusing him of that.

He actually wrote this:
“(sigh) There's no proof of any mass graves capable of containing ~700,000 cadavers at Treblinka. NONE, zip, zero, nada. What can't you understand about the simple statement.”

So you lied about him, and then lied to cover that up by cutting out the part where he wrote what evidence he SPECIFIED was absent.

So this is again evidence that it is YOU who are lying. And doing that to an insanely transparent degree.
It is literally lunatic behaviour.
You appear to have totally gone over the edge of what ever little sanity you were clinging on to.

And now that I have demonstrated this, you will probably revert to censoring this evidence of your lying by removing this.

CENSORSHIP: It is a typical H-promoter/H-defender tactic. Naturally, as you collectively have no credible evidence nor honest reply to reasoned debate.

This thread is about what is physically possible, there is another thread to discuss the transports. Turnagain has been lying about a lack of records, to divert attention from the lack of evidence of mass transports from TII of c840,000 to the Lublin district. It is physically impossible for so many people to be transported and accommodated and that to leave no evidence.

Nobody claims that the Germans built gas chambers, dug large pits, exhumed bodies and cremated them as described by the alleged eyewitnesses.  There are several dozen supposed witnesses to Treblinka being an extermination facility but Nessie can't name a single witness that tells a coherent story about the murderous events that supposedly took place in Treblinka.  "WHAT IF" the little boy riding a tricycle to the moon was a NASA project.  Then it "COULDA" happened. 

Nessie wrote:

Eliahu Rosenberg testified under oath that the gas chamber was "absolutely hermetically sealed". He claimed to be an eyewitness to the entire process and helped to unload the dead bodies from the gas chamber. He described in some detail how the doors functioned and how "clins" were used to secure the unloading doors.

What was Rosenberg's "figurative description" that I'm taking too literally?

Nessie wrote:

It wasn't "obvious to most" or even obvious to anyone at the Eichmann trial where Rosenberg gave his testimony. Nobody questioned his claim that the gas chamber was hermetically sealed. They obviously took his testimony quite literally. Why should I make allowances for his "mistakes" and not take him literally?