You are the defence for the Nazis in court, what do you do?

This is just what Nessie thinks the rules of evidence should be. He then goes on to demand it. LOL

Since your clients have all admitted to the crimes, with, for most, there is no evidence of any form of coercion and you cannot find one single witness to speak to something else other than gassings happening and there is other evidence that gassings, mass burials and cremations happened, the verdict is a slam dunk guilty one.

The AR camp trials of the late 1950s to the 1970s, were by Germans, in West Germany and were the perfect opportunity for Germans to reveal what did happen inside those places. Every single Nazi admitted there were gassings. No evidence was presented at any of the trials, that something else had happened. None of the Germans involved ever admitted they were part of a hoax. No one came forward to say what did happen.

To believe that those Germans and the trials were part of a Holocaust hoax conspiracy, is to believe the earth if flat or the moon is made of cheese.

The founding mythology for the postwar governments of the defeated nations was determined by the Victors and their postwar collaborators.

This founding mythos was that the defeated powers unilaterally started the war and were ruled by a criminal regime during that war. It was the last Good War since the "Good Guys" won it.

There was simply no way to argue that the Nazis were not criminal since they were the ones who lost the war.

The Holocaust narrative is used to this day all over the world to shield Jews from criticism and to break down Western cultural barriers in favor of an anarcho-tyrannic babel of Third World demographics suitable for cosmopolitan Jews to control Thought in an Orwellian context.

This means that an anti-Semite is not one who dislikes Jews but someone whom Jews dislike. About the only thing worse than calling out and criticizing a Jew is to actually kill a violent Negro in self-defense.

Debating the Holocaust in good faith strips this dogma bare. That is why it is so important, and why it is rarely if ever allowed to happen.

In fact, we are a LONG way for that debate ever happening in academia, which since WWII has become increasingly infused and now saturated with Woke Globalism and Cultural Bolshevism ─ and especially in countries like modern Germany where an honest evaluation of WWII questions like War Guilt and the relations between Gentiles and Jews are set-piece narratives that cannot be honestly challenged.

Murders are committed everywhere, that does not make a murder a holocaust. How many dead jews make a holocaust, it is suspected now ^-6 million.

If Nessie continues on his mantra of evidencing which is a cosmic ideal he will be confined to his Oasis where he can moderate his own demise.

Nessie wrote:

Evidence is irrelevant in politicized show trials. As Scott said in an above post:

Your claim that the Germans were given fair trials by impartial judges is laughable.