Back in 2010, I had a conversation with a Jewish friend – a judge – where she characterised the Jewish condition as one of being eternally prejudiced against. So I asked her why Jews had been the object of so much maltreatment and hatred throughout history. I responded by asking her what was wrong with Jews?
(I had never mentioned that I was Jewish on my father’s side, because that had never meant much to either him or me.) My question startled her, and she asked just what did I mean by that statement. So I proceeded to put it in personal terms: if a few people I met disliked me, I could easily put it down to some problem they had. But if virtually everyone I met hated my guts, it would be extremely difficult for me not to acknowledge – grudgingly or otherwise – that there was something fundamentally wrong with me or with how I behaved. Same thing applied to Jews on a macro level.
As you can imagine, that assessment did not exactly endear me to my soon-to-be-former friend. I compounded it by adding that Jews had done many charitable works and made many notable achievements in many different fields… But there are also the darker things that some Jews have done, and are doing today, here and abroad. This is especially true whenever Israel or anything associated with it enters the equation: those good qualities mostly then fly out the window. On such occasions, most Jews not only tolerate but extol behaviour by Israel as a country and by individual Israelis – behaviour that they would never tolerate or celebrate here, or in any other country where Jews reside.
When I initially examined this topic, I identified three forms of historical
antisemitism:
— A dislike of Jews as a people or Judaism as a religion, or both, usually because of some attributes Jews had or some way in which they behaved toward others.
— An opposition not so much to Jews and/or Judaism, but to an armed Jewish state (whatever it might be called).
— The assertion by some Jews beginning in the late 1970s that any criticism of Israel, its leaders, its policies, its actions or anything any of its advocates and supports said or did, constituted a “new
antisemitism.”
In each of these instances, when I say “
antisemitism” I mean
allegations and/or accusations of antisemitism for any reason, not simply a blind, insensate hatred of Jews and/or Judaism (which historically is rare).
The first form of historical antisemitism has existed throughout recorded history. Part of it I suspect is a reaction to an unusually blood-thirsty view of others.
Deuteronomy and
Judges are awash in carnage, and the former (Chapters 5 & 7) gives scriptural justification for genociding people who simply worship differently.
Some (all?) Jewish religious holidays (Hanukkah, Purim) have rather sanguinary antecedents or overtones; even Passover is predicated on mass infanticide. And that is just the
Torah.
To say that the
Talmud (sort of a complementary commentary to the
Torah by notable rabbis) in its entirety is downright appalling is an understatement.
Having read portions of the Talmud over the years, I can understand why Jews do not encourage the goyim (non-Jews) to do likewise. Quite the contrary: Jewish disdain for Christians in particular (made explicit in the Talmud) is as great as their desire for political and financial support from them, and extends (or descends) from theology to cheap theatre.
Rome demonstrated the second form of historical antisemitism during its imperial days. The Roman Empire demanded obedience, expected taxes to be paid, and mandated religious tolerance to permit its diverse peoples to move and live therein. It finally tired of dealing with a rebellious and religiously intolerant people, and ultimately put its own “final solution” into effect. Rome razed Jerusalem, destroyed the Second Temple, dismembered the state encompassing it, and dispersed the inhabitants – but did nothing to Jews living, and often flourishing, throughout the Empire. Precisely why the Romans did not deal with the Jews within as completely as they did for example with the Carthaginians without, is something about which I have often wondered.
So far, so good – or bad, depending on one’s perspective. Theologically. Judaism isn’t quite a companion of the old Aztecs, but it has more than enough bloodshed and darkness within the books of the
Torah (the Christian Bible’s Old Testament) that Christianity would have done better going from
Genesis straight to the Gospels.
And the
Talmud as the primary source of Jewish law is replete with outright malevolence. Combining such hostility with the power of a state – any power, any state – is a mortal danger to that state’s neighbours, and any others it can reach.
The third form of historical antisemitism was initially almost a passive defense mechanism, not widely shared and limited in application. Where I went wrong in my original discussion was to misunderstand the complexity of that “new antisemitism” and to underestimate its ramifications and sociopolitical reach. Sometime between the end of the Reagan Administration and that of Obama, it spawned a more proactive variant. Together, passively and actively, antisemitism and the new antisemitism now constitute the shield and sword of a militant hyper-Zionism. Israel is its current home base and the United States as its enforcer of the moment.
…Over the centuries, Jews overall have acquired a well-deserved reputation for disruption, in addition to other more admirable qualities. Virtually every social disorder afflicting the West in general and especially he United States today, for example, appeared in the Weimar Republic of Germany in the 1920s and early 1930s. Cities like San Francisco now mirror Hamburg from that era. Pick your extremism or perversion, they had it then as we have it today. Then as now, Jews figured conspicuously in all of those movements, as the litany of their involvement in our day and time depicts. Also then as now, social and economic disorder was seen by its Jewish architects as something to be exploited to their own advantage, impervious to its impact on the population as a whole.
As in the early Soviet Union, the Jewish quest for economic power extended to political power and influence in the greater society of all Western countries. I’ll only look here at the United States, but the situation is much the same throughout all of Western Europe and much of Eastern Europe, as well as Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Indeed, if it were not so destructive of everything whites had built over the centuries, one could almost admire the single-minded Jewish determination to dominate – a determination in which some innate consensus almost eclipses the need for conspiracy and cabal. (The operative word is “almost.”)
What Jews have done in America and in so much of the West is what they tried to do in Germany during the aforementioned Weimar Republic, but here they have been more patient and circumspect until very recently. In 20th century Germany, they openly identified with the communists, and advocated practices such as gender dysphoria and pedophilia (led by Magnus Hirshfeld) before they were in a position to stave off critics and attacks. (They ended up fleeing the country when Hitler and his party came to power in the early 1930s – theirs were the books that the National Socialists famously burned).
Not so here. Jews in the U.S. founded the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) in 1909, and later took the lead in radical movements such as the “Students for a Democratic Society (SDS)” and the “Free Speech Movement” during the combined militancy of the antiwar and civil rights movements of the 1960s. But when their hoped-for revolution did not materialize, they went – well, not so much underground, but into a form of low-key radicalism, as I have discussed elsewhere. In this phase, they initially emphasized infiltration of universities. Once within the academic bastions, they staffed the critical professions: education and law first, then business along with the faculties of higher education themselves.
The end result was that they gained control of the mainstream media, much of academe, and prominence in many other areas. This, combined with the growing power of two Jewish-led organizations – the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) – as arbiters of political acceptability, had the intended effect of ensuring that the American people rarely heard, read or saw anything critical of Israel, let alone Jewish power or Jewish supremacism.
Interestingly enough, the ADL in particular is now openly joining the chorus of anti-white voices, and declaring that criticism of Antifa (recall its heritage) to be “hate speech.” Both ADL and SPLC have become much more adept at defaming and ruining critics of causes they support, then of defending the Jewish people themselves or others against slander and abuse. In the process, they’ve liberally enriched themselves and their leadership.
To those who might say I am exaggerating Jewish power, I would say (quoting an individual who will remain nameless for his own protection): “I’ll stop believing in inordinate Jewish power when people can discuss Jewish power in public, without having their lives destroyed by powerful Jews.”
I expect Kanye West and some others in the black community who dared mention something those “powerful Jews” did not appreciate, could add to that.
But it was not simply power in the media, academia, finance and the courts. There was a significant growth in direct Jewish participation in the government,
no matter which political party is in power, wholly different from the situation 60-odd years ago.
For example, for decades, Jewish groups such as ADL and SPLC had increasingly vetted nominees for political appointments. They could not always get the ones they supported, but they had an effective veto over ones they did not support – I speak from personal experience.
At this point in time , no one in either party can be a serious contender for the presidency in the face of Zionist opposition (or Jewish, perhaps a distinction without a difference). And that includes DeSantis and Trump as well as Biden. No serious contender for any national office, with the partial and very occasional exception of the House of Representatives, dares criticize Israel or mention directly the Jewish role in everything bad that is happening – they talk around them, but few say the “I or “J” words critically. Not even former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard (whom I generally and genuinely admire) or Robert F. Kennedy Jr. They know what will happen if they do. And the same holds for governors like Kristi Noem (SD) and Greg Abbott (TX) , who understand full well the extent to which the power of organizations like ADL and SPLC and their cohorts extends into state governments – especially state legislatures.
As for the administrations themselves, for the last thirty years or so, they have been so heavily Jewish that one could relocate them to Tel Aviv and not notice the difference. Trump talked about “Making America Great Again,” but he was a far better president for Israel than he was in fact – if not in words – for the United States. A list of some of the principal things Trump did for Israel indicates as much. Like Trump’s administration before him, Biden’s administration is dominated by Jews.
Author of the above excerpt is ALAN SABROSKY • MAY 30, 2023
Read the rest of his article here:
link
