140 years ago, on December 31, 1881, Jacob de Haan, victim of the first Zionist political murder in Palestine, was born.
Jacob Israel de Haan (1881-1924) was a lawyer, journalist, writer and Jewish poet born in the Netherlands.
He arrived in Palestine in 1919 excited with Zionism, but soon understood the violent and anti-Judaic character of the Zionist invasion and joined Rabbi Yosef Chaim Sonnenfeld and other Jewish leaders in the fight against Zionism. He becomes the spokesman for the Jewish opposition to Zionism movement formed by the Orthodox Jews who have lived in Palestine long before the arrival of the Zionists. He writes on the subject and makes diplomatic contacts with Arab and European leaderships in defense of the anti-Zionism cause. This worries the Zionist movement.
On June 30, 1924, Haan's Jacob Israel was murdered by the Haganah, one of the Zionist paramilitary organizations in Palestine. Avraham Tehomi, his killer, later said that he "had done what the Haganah decided had to be done. And nothing was done without the order of Yitzhak Ben-Zvi [who became the second president of Israel]. I have no regrets because he (de Haan) wanted to destroy our whole idea of Zionism."
Jacob de Haan is considered by the Dutch section of the Amnesty International its precursor, by his fight against Tsarist Russia for the liberation of Russian Jews accused of being Bolsheviks.
To this day, Jacob de Haan is venerated by the Haredi community as a martyr murdered by secular Jews for his defense of Judaism.
Regarding zionist political murder, here is a video that can not be viewed in Europe. For some reason people in Europe are considered neither mature enough nor intelligent enough to view this material.
Further sign that people are becoming less afraid of challenging and criticising tactics often employed by Jews that attempt to silence people or discredit their viewpoints by attacking them with the anti-semite canard.
Even other Jews seem to be getting disgusted by the tactic.
People who have a cult-like emotional attachment to certain WW2 atrocity narratives should maybe take note. 😉
That old anti-semitism smear
By Edward Welsch | Chronicles Magazine | January 12, 2022
Chronicles Associate Editor Pedro Gonzalez was accused of being an anti-Semite by The Spectator Associate Editor Douglas Murray last week. In an article entitled “When the Right plays with Jew-hate” Murray wrote that Gonzalez “unmasked himself boringly and yet still wretchedly, as an antisemite.”
Murray then quoted two of Gonzalez’s Twitter threads. In the first, Gonzalez responded to a tweet by the left-wing economist David Rothschild claiming that “Republican intellectuals *despise* the Constitution.” Gonzalez riposted that Rothschild is as “dumb” as he is “repulsive” and that his “physiognomy is pure nightmare fuel.” In the second, responding to a taunt by the lawyer Ari Cohn calling conservatives stupid, Gonzalez said that Cohn possessed a “cursed goblin physiognomy.”
The problem with Murray’s accusation is that anyone who follows Gonzalez on Twitter or searches his timeline for the term “physiognomy” will notice that he frequently lobs such jibes at political opponents of all ethnic backgrounds. One of his favorite targets is David French, a white, Anglo-Saxon Protestant neoconservative.
Even if one finds Gonzalez’s remarks about physical appearance to be frivolous or tasteless, there is absolutely nothing he tweeted that would justify Murray’s extravagant, unsubstantiated claim of anti-Semitism. David Goldman, a conservative Jewish columnist for Asia Times Online wrote: “Pedro L. Gonzalez does NOT use ‘physiognomy’ as a code-word for ‘Jew’. Bad taste is not the same thing as anti-Semitism.”
David Reaboi, a national security expert who is also Jewish, echoed the sentiment: “Bullshit accusations of antisemitism are so contemptible”.
Investigative journalist Matthew Tyrmand was equally unimpressed: “This is beyond spurious and specious and is frankly an embarrassing attempt to smear a rising intellectual star”. Tyrmand’s father, Leopold, was an émigré Polish-Jewish novelist who was Chronicles’ founding editor. Leopold left Poland largely due to Stalinist censorship. But to his surprise, he observed something akin to Stalinism emerging in the United States, with the media and its mercenaries acting as self-appointed arbiters of acceptable discourse.
A woman has just received a custodial sentence of 11 months imprisonment in England for 5-year old Facebook comments that have been deemed by the judge as ‘racial incitement’. Nobody would have known they existed if it wasn’t for a main-stream British newspaper ‘The Times’ and then the Jewish organisation called Campaign Against Anti-semitism (CAA) doing a search to find material against her and then repeating parts of her posts.
Here is a youtube video of her and supporters of hers waiting outside the Old Bailey for the verdict.
A Jewish friend of hers speaks in her defence at 10:30.
And here is what the CAA themselves have published about the case:
PROMINENT GRENFELL TOWER VOLUNTEER AID WORKER TAHRA AHMED FOUND GUILTY OF PUBLISHING WRITTEN MATERIAL IN ORDER TO STIR UP RACIAL HATRED, AFTER BEING REPORTED TO POLICE BY CAA
Tahra Ahmed, a prominent Grenfell Tower volunteer aid worker who was reported to the police by Campaign Against Antisemitism, has today been found guilty of publishing written material in order to stir up racial hatred.
Ms Ahmed, 51, was exposed in The Times as having claimed that the victims of the Grenfell Tower fire were “burnt alive in a Jewish sacrifice.” After the tragic fire that left 71 dead, Ms Ahmed said that she had been coordinating the work of volunteers, coaching them and running workshops with the aim of empowering them. She reportedly discussed her beliefs with some of the people she has helped.
Ms Ahmed was found guilty of two counts of incitement to racial hatred, following the trial instigated by Campaign Against Antisemitism.
Gideon Falter, Chief Executive of Campaign Against Antisemitism, said:
“Tahra Ahmed sought to twist the Grenfell Tower tragedy to fit her venomous world view in which it seems that any evil can be attributed to Jews. She used people’s suffering and anger in the aftermath of the Grenfell tragedy and tried to wield it as a weapon against Jews before an audience of tens of thousands on social media. We are pleased that the jury has convicted her over her wicked fabrications. As we have seen, her hatred has not only enabled her to abuse the Grenfell tragedy, but also to accuse Jews of being responsible for 9/11 and of supposedly exaggerating the Holocaust. As the prosecution observed, she used her position as an aid volunteer in the aftermath of Grenfell to ‘bait the mob’ against Jewish people, making her conduct particularly repulsive.”In her social media posts, Ms Ahmed had written: “Watch the live footage of people trapped in the inferno with flames behind them. They were burnt alive in a Jewish sacrifice. Grenfell is owned by a private Jewish property developer just like the twin towers. I wonder how much Goldman [Goldman Sachs, a bank often targeted by antisemites] is standing to make in the world’s most expensive real estate location [Kensington].”
... She has also described the Holocaust as the “holohoax” and posted on Facebook that “Hitler and the Germans were the victims of the Jewish conspiracy to destroy Germany.”
She is also a proponent of the antisemitic conspiracy theory that the 9/11 terror attacks were faked by Jews. In one Facebook comment found by Campaign Against Antisemitism after The Times published its article, she wrote: “All the leadership of ISIS is directly recruited by CIA and the leadership are all Arab Jews, trained by Mossad.”
Campaign Against Antisemitism also uncovered posts by Ms Ahmed claiming that “Jews have always been the ones behind ritual torture, crucifixion and murder of children,” a comment redolent of the blood libel.
Other posts described the antisemite Gilad Atzmon as her “good friend” and complained about the “hold of Jewish power over our so-called free and democratic society”, claimed that “Zioborg overlords are engineering a civil war”, and referenced a supposed “Zioborg Banking cartel”, among other inflammatory comments.
She has also promoted the far-right, antisemitic “Kalergi Plan” conspiracy theory, which claimed that there is a plot to mix white Europeans with other races through immigration.
Following The Times’ exposé and the further research by Campaign Against Antisemitism, we reported Ms Ahmed to the police and called for her to be prosecuted. The five-day trial, held at the Old Bailey after Westminster Magistrates’ Court declined jurisdiction, ended today with a guilty verdict from a jury. Ms Ahmed, who denied two counts of stirring up racial hatred by publishing written material, was described by prosecutor Hugh French as having “published two posts that were virulently antisemitic and crossed the line as to what is acceptable in a liberal society.”
During the trial, the prosecution read a statement by Campaign Against Antisemitism’s Chief Executive, Gideon Falter.
Giving evidence, Ms Ahmed said that she campaigns against the arms trade, with her lawyer describing her work as being part of the “social justice movement.”
She claimed to have a problem with “Zionist Jews, not all Jews,” and that when she talks about “Zionist Jews” or “Talmudic Jews” or “Satantic Jews” people know whom she is referring to, conceding that there were times when she wrote something and failed to make a distinction between the particular Jews whom she was talking about and Jews in general. She claimed that... The Times, by publishing her posts, is guilty of inciting racial hatred, rather than her...
... When Ms Ahmed was asked about her claim that “Jews are always the ones behind ritual murder, especially young boys, to atone and be let back in Palestine” she insisted that “there are millions of Jewish people who are anti-Zionist and many are Facebook friends, so if any of them were offended they would have pointed it out,” adding that “If it [the comment] stirred up racial hatred, it would have happened by now.”
The defence asked Ms Ahmed who the “Satanic ruling Jews” are, to which she responded that they are “the bankers, owners of media and corporations, they manipulate and control a lot of evil in the world and I want it to end and so I expose who they are. Unfortunately, sometimes I don’t qualify by saying ‘Satanic’ and some racists would comment and I’d delete the comment or tell them off. People would share racist or inflammatory memes and I’d delete them, even though I’m passionate about freedom of speech. My intention is to educate them.”
On the Holocaust, Ms Ahmed told the court, “I’m not a Holocaust denier…unfortunately, six million Jews is a number that has been perpetuated and the actual number has been revised down by experts.” She affirmed using the term “Holohoax”, arguing that “it was manipulated and exaggerated at the time” and that, regarding the actual number of deaths in the Holocaust, “The Jewish council [sic] says 3.5 million…the Red Cross says 283,000.” She also baselessly asserted that “Hitler had an agreement with Rothschild to put Jews in concentration camps so Rothschild could transfer Jews to Palestine” and approvingly quoted a known Holocaust denier [revisionist]. She was also pressed on why she described the expulsion of the Jews from England in the Middle Ages as a “final solution to the Jewish problem.”
The judge asked Ms Ahmed about 9/11: “It’s a yes or no question. Do you believe Jews were responsible for 9/11?” Ms Ahmed replied that “It’s not fair to answer that without context,” also variously describing the terrorist attack as a “false flag” operation and a “Mossad” operation. She further claimed that “Before US Presidents are elected, they show their allegiance to Israel to pay homage to say ‘we’re here to serve you’.”
During her testimony, Ms Ahmed also invoked far-right conspiracy theories, for example asserting that “Kabbalistic Jews don’t want Europe to remain white. Personally, I’m multicultural and love diversity. This plan is to bring other people into the land to deliberately destroy cultures,” a claim akin to the replacement theory...
Her testimony also featured further comments about “Rothschild” control of the banking system; “ZioNazis”; “real Ashkenazis” and “Satanic Ashkenazis”; the “Bilderberg group” (which often features in conspiracy theories); “powerful people behind world governments”; a “cabal” akin to the “deep state” and “the most powerful ones at the top are Jewish”; the Khazar myth, which holds that contemporary Jews are actually a converted Central Asian people with no claim to the Land of Israel, and other... theories, including about the CIA and the COVID-19 “scamdemic”.
The prosecution accused Ms Ahmed of “using the witness box as a pulpit for your views” and of knowingly and deliberately “whipping up the mob with her social media posts.”
In her defence, over the course of her ...testimony Ms Ahmed insisted that “I’m not racist or antisemitic... They don’t care that I write about Muslim terrorist organisations, I’m not accused of being islamophobic or anti-white or anti-British.”
She described the trial as a “witchhunt” and claimed that, during case management and her plea hearing last year, she was “unlawfully arrested, incarcerated and tortured for six days” and suffered from “post-traumatic stress disorder” as a result, inhibiting her from mounting a strong defence. At more than one point, she was rebuked by the judge for misleading the jury about the case management process.
Earlier in the case, her defence counsel was the same barrister who defended Alison Chabloz and Jeremy Bedford-Turner, both of whom were sent to prison following prosecutions initiated by Campaign Against Antisemitism. Ms Ahmed later replaced her counsel.
Ms Ahmed had supporters at court, one of whom was seen wearing a yellow star, seemingly in an effort to liken vaccinations to the Holocaust, in a form of softcore Holocaust denial that has become widespread amongst conspiracy theorists during the pandemic. The supporters were warned by a clerk to stop attempting to communicate with her during the trial after they were observed trying to signal to her.
Today, Ms Ahmed was found guilty by eleven of the twelve jurors, who agreed on both counts, following the trial before His Honour Judge Mark Dennis QC. We are grateful to the CST for once again providing security for CAA personnel at the trial.
Here the founder of the IDF and a leading architect of the genocidal colonisation of territory in the Middle East, writes that he would rather that half the Jewish children in Germany in the 1940s should perish than give up his desire for a Jew-only state in Palestine.
The quote is taken from comments he made to Mapai’s central committee on December 7th, 1938. This followed Britain’s decision to deny entrance into Palestine of 10,000 German Jewish orphans in the wake of Kristallnacht, instead offering them asylum within Great Britain.
‘If I knew that it would be possible to save [either] all the [Jewish] children in Germany by bringing them over to England, [or] only half of them by transporting them to Eretz Yisrael, then I would opt for the second alternative. For we must weigh not only the life of these children, but also the history of the People of Israel.’
~~ David Ben Gurion
[SOURCE: Yoav Gelber, ‘Zionist policy and the Fate of European Jewry,’ Yad Vashem Studies (1939-42) p.199]
. . .
David Ben Gurion was a Polish Jew born in Plonsk, which at the time was part of the Russian Empire. He originally was named David Grün. He became the first Prime Minister of Israel. He ordered the assassination of J.F.Kennedy, the US President in 1963.
Last Edit: Feb 17, 2022 11:49:49 GMT by been_there
Three Canadian members of parliament used their self-identification as members of an imaginary abstract, non-genetical ‘tribe’ to win a point of order in the house. This is the insidious nature of the ‘special’ treatment and unwarranted, undeserved expectations that those people self-identifying as ‘jewish’ are demanding. And two of these parliamentarians referred to their ‘special’ status as ‘children of holocaust survivors’, to further win support for their views and arguments. This is the dangerous predicament that this FALSE, exaggerated, removed-from-context, pseudo-historical ‘holocaust’ belief-system has reduced us to.
I suggest this is behaviour that most no longer be permitted in society! It has has to stop.
Related to the above post of FOUR Canadian parliamentarians arguing their points based on bogus WW2 mythology and THREE of them claiming ‘special’ status because of a self-identification of being ‘jewish’, I thought it might be interesting to refer to another aspect of this.
The parliamentarian who started with the emotionally manipulative WW2 reference was the Prime minister Justin Trudeau.
Trudeau is alleged to be the biological son of Fidel Castro.
Fidel Castro secretly regarded himself as ‘Jewish’.
Not a lot of people know this. 🙂
There has been recently quite a bit of mass-media denial of the allegation of Trudeau’s Castro paternity. But it is only journalistic fluff with no substance. They deny it but they don’t actually ‘debunk’ it. They only claim to ‘debunk’ it.
The rumours have been circulating for years: it’s easy to find side-by-side photographic comparisons of Fidel Castro and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, showing the strong physical resemblance between the two. This rattles the establishment media to the extent that they “debunk” it regularly. Last Saturday, the New York Times ran a piece entitled: “An old falsehood resurfaces: that Justin Trudeau is Fidel Castro’s son”. On Tuesday, the Daily Beast chimed in with ‘Truckers Resurrect Bananas Theory About Trudeau’s Real Dad’.
True to form for the establishment media, neither addressed the points that have been made in favour of the claim.
Pierre andMargaret Trudeau in 1976 with Margaret having both arms around Fidel Castro
In the age of sloppy journalism, few authors are sloppier than those who claim they ‘debunked’ the story that Fidel Castro is Justin Trudeau’s biological father. They recite the Canadian governments’ official travel dates to Cuba and painfully avoid the Trudeaus’ extensive personal trip to the Caribbean trip in Spring 1971. It is a fact the Trudeaus were in the Caribbean in Spring 1971. It is a fact they adored Castro. It is a fact the Trudeaus were swingers. This is what you need to know...
...First, Margaret Trudeau, Pierre Trudeau, and Fidel Castro were all notoriously sexually promiscuous. Margaret Trudeau was a partier who unquestionably had sex with men while married to Pierre. Nobody knows if Pierre objected. They met when he was 48 and she was 18. They got married when he was 53 and she was 23. Their marriage surprised Canada because Pierre had been a lifelong playboy with no wife or children. He would be turning 60 when she was barely out of her 20’s. She publicly states today she suffered from bipolar disorder and self-control issues. She smuggled drugs in the Prime Minister’s official government luggage. She sneaked away from official functions to get high. She partied scantily clad at Studio 54. She became embroiled in a scandal for having sex with Ted Kennedy (gross). According to Keith Richards of the Rolling Stones, Pierre broke up with her while she was having an affair with Ronnie Wood. The list goes on.
... Second, the Trudeaus adored Castro. They, their aides and friends all said so. According to John English’s “Just Watch Me: The Life of Pierre Elliot Trudeau 1968–2000” they were charmed by Castro and made several trips to embargo-era Cuba just to see him. In 2000, Castro made a rare appearance out of Cuba to attend Pierre’s funeral in Canada. On his visit, Margaret welcomed the leader at his hotel on behalf of the Trudeaus. They demonstrated a striking level of familiarity before even getting off the tarmac of their 1976 trip. They all took photographs together. The Trudeaus introduced Castro to their children. And when Castro died, Justin Trudeau was the only leader of the Western World to give him an overwhelmingly positive eulogy...
...Third, the timing is uncanny. This is the part about which ‘debunkers’ intentionally mislead readers. Justin Trudeau was born on Christmas day, 1971. In order for his father to be Fidel Castro, his mother would have to be somewhere close to Cuba in March and April 1971. She was. In April 1971, the Trudeaus took a long “second honeymoon” all around the Caribbean. According to Wikipedia, they visited one island they declined to disclose. It is the only island they did not disclose.
Footnote 19 of the same Wikipedia article cites to an April 13, 1971 article from The Ottawa Journal. The article states that the Trudeaus were visiting an unidentified island in the Caribbean and wanted the press to give them privacy:
To be clear: they disclosed all the other locations they visited but asked the press for privacy when they went to the “unidentified” island. Come on!
Justin Trudeau was born 8 1/2 months later. In 1976, Pierre eagerly became the first NATO leader to travel to Cuba. He brought his wife. Before even leaving the tarmac, both Trudeaus were showing an unusual amount of familiarity with Fidel considering he was a national leader they just allegedly met.
Within hours of their first official meeting, Margaret was photographed intimately touching and holding Fidel Castro with both arms [photo above]. The Trudeaus announced they had become besties with the dictator and sang his praises...
Due to his age and lack of previous children, rumours began to spread that Pierre was infertile and that Castro and others were the biological fathers of his children. Perhaps that was unfair at the time. But then Justin Trudeau improbably grew up to look like this:
So what is all this talk about “debunking” the claim? It could not be less compelling. 100% of the ‘debunking’ articles avoid addressing the Caribbean trip altogether.
Here is an excerpt from an amazing article that dares to discuss an aspect of the current crisis between Nato/Ukraine and Putin’s Russia that main-stream media and our political leaders would never dare to go anywhere near.
Russia, Ukraine and the rôle of Jewish oligarchs
...much of what we are seeing here is not just grand geopolitics and clashing nationalisms, but a subtext of oligarchic feuds. In many respects, what we are seeing play out is a kind of perverse morbid rehash of the Middle Ages, when one king, funded and supported by “his Jews,” would wage war on another funded by his own group of Jews. The end result is normally richer Jews and a lot of European dead.
It’s increasingly clear that Putin’s Jewish oligarchs are unhappy with having to bear the brunt of Western sanctions. The Times of Israel reported that two of the three Russian oligarchs sanctioned by the UK on February 22 were Jewish (and related) — Igor and Boris Rotenberg. Boris Rotenberg is co-owner of SGM Group, Russia’s largest construction and infrastructure company. Igor Rotenberg dominates in drilling, infrastructure and real estate.
The international Jewish community is also becoming increasingly active in trying to protect sanctioned oligarchs on both sides — primarily because oligarchs are often extremely generous to Jews, in effect facilitating the transfer of large volumes of money (often illegal and laundered) from gentiles to Jews. Anything that weakens the oligarchs will, in the longer term, weaken the Jews as a whole. A report in Haaretz on February 27 comments:
Several billionaire Jewish philanthropists are the focus of concerned attention from Israeli and Jewish organizations who have benefited from their largesse. Topping that list is Roman Abramovich, the dual Russian-Israeli citizen who made a fortune through the privatization of Russia’s oil companies and is now reportedly the second-wealthiest man in Israel. Representatives of several Israeli organizations and institutions, including the Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial and museum in Jerusalem, Sheba Medical Center in Tel Hashomer and Tel Aviv University, sent a letter asking U.S. Ambassador to Israel Tom Nides to refrain from sanctioning Abramovich for “his contribution to the Jewish people.” The letter earlier this month reportedly included the signature of Israel’s Ashkenazi chief rabbi, David Lau, asserting that sanctioning Abramovich — who, in addition to his philanthropic donations, has business investments in Israel — would harm Jewish causes.
The United States, for its part, hasn’t been moved by these appeals, and in fact “sent Israel messages warning Jerusalem to make sure that Russian oligarchs sanctioned by the international community can’t hide their money in Israeli banks.” The article continues:
Another group of Russian billionaires — some of whom hold Israeli citizenship — who donate generously to Jewish and Israeli causes have already been hit by sanctions put in place against Russian banks. Mikhail Fridman, a co-founder and trustee of the Genesis Philanthropy Group and the Russian Jewish Congress, is the co-founder of Alfa Bank, which is the largest private bank in Russia, and he continues to sit on its board. Forbes listed him as the 11th richest man in Russia in 2020. … The Genesis Philanthropy Group gives to a long list of causes in Israel and across the Jewish world, including Yad Vashem, the Birthright-Taglit organization that provides free, 10-day trips to Israel for Diaspora Jews, Hillel international and Friends of the IDF.
Conclusion Can Putin be reined in by ‘his’ Jewish oligarchs if they start to feel a financial pinch? This remains to be seen, but early indications are that they certainly don’t fear him. Haaretz reported on February 28 that “Jewish billionaires Mikhail Fridman and Oleg Deripaska have become the first Russian oligarchs to publicly express unhappiness with President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine.” I think this is extremely telling.
A starving Jewish boy in rags lies alone on the streets of the Warsaw ghetto as well-dressed, well-fed Jewish children pass him by. Believed to be September 19, 1941.
Another photo showing Jewish children dying alone in the streets of the Warsaw Ghetto as other wealthier Jewish children stand around and pass by.
The Warsaw Ghetto was the largest of all the Jewish ghettos in Nazi-occupied Europe during World War II. It was established in the Polish capital between October and November 16, 1940, in the territory of the General Government of German-occupied Poland, with over 400,000 Jews from the vicinity forcibly residing in an area of only 3.4 km2 (1.3 sq mi). A largely unmentioned aspect of the European-Jewish wartime experience is the wicked, cruel and self-serving treatment of Jews by other Jews.
Remember when internet users were getting so fed up with Jewish-owned, internet-controlling, pro-Israeli company GOOGLE’s blatant limiting of what could be found on the .net — PLUS were spying on what it’s users were searching for — that they started boycotting GOOGLE and using other search engines?
Oneof the search engines that became available was called DuckDuckGo.
Well recently DuckDuckGo's founder and CEO, Gabriel Weinberg (Jewish?) has admitted he has started messing with what his search engine’s users are permitted to see.
So, how did Gabriel Weinberg get started? Well, he somehow raised $6million start-up money to start his alternative search-engine as a competitor to GOOGLE. The result? He now owns the third largest search engine in world today and has a reputed 2.3 billion dollar personal fortune.
Hmmmmm? Interesting... Was his family rich? Er, no. His father is a doctor. Where did he get such investors? Well... Weinberg admitted: ”We had users before we even had a product”.
Hunh? 🤔 But... How did you get people using a product that didn’t yet exist?
As Lenin said, if you want to control the ”opposition” create it yourself.
“The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.”
~ Lenin ~
1. Hulbee (now redirected to Swisscows.com) Hulbee offers total privacy regarding both your search terms and location history. Plus, it does not record or store any of the data that can identify you. The privacy-oriented search solution gets that done using encryption, which prevents information leakage. It also lets you select a region for more relevant results. Besides, the semantic map of this privacy-first engine enables you to have an interactive research experience. This private alternative is an ideal search engine for the family as its search results never include sexual or pornographic content.
2. Yippy.com Yippy allows you to filter the results manually according to various categories and mark any result as inappropriate. Unlike other search engines, with Yippy, you can look up content of a very diverse nature, such as web, news, images, government data, jobs, blogs, etc. It neither records your searches nor shows custom ads. (That is the reason why it is on this list). However, similarly to Google (in a good way), it does allow users to view the cached pages.
3. StartPage.com It is a platform that defines itself as the most private search engine in the world since “it does not register, track or share your personal data.” StartPage makes its users browse through a proxy server, thus protecting them from sites tracking their location or IP addresses. In October 2019, System1, a US ad-tech firm, acquired major shares in Startpage via its subsidiary Privacy One Group Ltd. This raises the question, “is StartPage safe?” Answering this thing in detail on their website, Startpage confirmed operating under the EU data privacy laws. While this sounds relieving, another problem with this firm is its base in The Netherlands – a part of the Nine Eyes alliance. So, even though StartPage makes it to this list of the best anonymous search engines, I recommend you remain a bit cautious when using it. That’s because of the new Startpage owners and board members’ underlying risk of potentially collecting users’ personal data as they are an ad-tech company. But yes, its “Anonymous View” feature, the private browsing mode of this search engine, is a pro that outshines most of the cons.
4. Gibiru.com This search engine encrypts user data and prevents it from falling into the hands of third parties. It works faster than most encrypted search engines. That’s because it uses “Google Custom Search” to provide quality service while eliminating all tracking methods that Google applies. So, Gibiru itself is not a custom-built privacy-focused search engine. Instead, it is a web tool based on Google but with privacy concerns eliminated from it. Gibiru was launched in 2009 with a community effort, and it remains so as it has not made the transition towards seeking any external funding.
Here is an extremely detailed article exposing the shenanigans of Ghislaine Maxwell, her last boyfriend Jeffery Epstein, her late father Robert Maxwell and a host of others.
There is a wealth of detail here. Yet curiously the author never mentions the fact that these three are/were all zionist Jews. The ‘Jewish’ self-identification appears to be a taboo topic. And yet it explains so many connections and shared loyalties/motivations that otherwise are inexplicable.
To continue to claim that Ghislaine Maxwell’s activities were only performed to please Jeffrey Epstein who only sought to financially extort certain individuals for his personal gain is dishonest when faced with the facts of the matter and the context in which their operations took place.
...the continued cover-up of their complex dealings means that justice will never be served for their enablers, while the names of those they unduly influenced will never become public.
It is a revelation that those in power must prevent the public from understanding at all costs, lest Americans realise that the United States has long been a country ruled by backdoor dealings, illicit intelligence operations, and blackmail.
This was news to me. Though it is news from last January. It is a Jewish newspaper in Britain, bragging about Jewish control of the BBC.
Richard Sharp set to become BBC's third Jewish chairman Sharp was an adviser to Boris Johnson during his time as London mayor
JANUARY 06, 2021
The BBC is set to appoint its second Jewish chairman after Sir David Clementi [Jewish] steps down from the role next month. Reports on Wednesday said the government was preparing to announce the appointment of Richard Sharp, a former banker at Goldman Sachs, as the new chair later this week.
The son of Lord Sharp of Grimsdyke, the new BBC chair was one of three children born to parents who were members of Westminster Synagogue.
...Lord Michael Grade, who is Jewish, chaired the corporation between 2004 and 2006.
Mr Sharp married an American, also named Victoria, in 1987 in Connecticut. He has spent most of his career in banking, starting with the city banker JP Morgan, and then spent more than 20 years with the Wall Street giant Goldman Sachs. He was an adviser to Boris Johnson during his time as London mayor. At Goldman Sachs he was said at one stage to have been Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s boss. Mr Sharp was on the Bank of England's Financial Policy Committee for six years until 2019. Mr Sharp has previously donated money to the Tory Party...
A post from Gibson on Jewish involvement in starting WW2:
When I point out the Jewish angle, I'm not saying that tells 100% of the story. I'm offering it as a corrective, as that important part of the story is generally omitted. It is [Jews] who [prefer to] view things through the lens of "Jew-blindness," an a priori refusal to notice any unsavoury Jewish role in historical events.
Here is what Charles Lindbergh said in his famous Des Moines speech on September 11, 1941.
National polls showed that when England and France declared war on Germany, in 1939, less than 10 percent of our population favored a similar course for America. But there were various groups of people, here and abroad, whose interests and beliefs necessitated the involvement of the United States in the war. I shall point out some of these groups tonight, and outline their methods of procedure. In doing this, I must speak with the utmost frankness, for in order to counteract their efforts, we must know exactly who they are.
The three most important groups who have been pressing this country toward war are the British, the Jewish and the Roosevelt administration.
Behind these groups, but of lesser importance, are a number of capitalists, Anglophiles, and intellectuals who believe that the future of mankind depends upon the domination of the British empire. Add to these the Communistic groups who were opposed to intervention until a few weeks ago, and I believe I have named the major war agitators in this country. The second major group I mentioned is the Jewish.
It is not difficult to understand why Jewish people desire the overthrow of Nazi Germany. The persecution they suffered in Germany would be sufficient to make bitter enemies of any race.
No person with a sense of the dignity of mankind can condone the persecution of the Jewish race in Germany. But no person of honesty and vision can look on their pro-war policy here today without seeing the dangers involved in such a policy both for us and for them. Instead of agitating for war, the Jewish groups in this country should be opposing it in every possible way for they will be among the first to feel its consequences.
Tolerance is a virtue that depends upon peace and strength. History shows that it cannot survive war and devastations. A few far-sighted Jewish people realize this and stand opposed to intervention. But the majority still do not.
Their greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio and our government.
I am not attacking either the Jewish or the British people. Both races, I admire. But I am saying that the leaders of both the British and the Jewish races, for reasons which are as understandable from their viewpoint as they are inadvisable from ours, for reasons which are not American, wish to involve us in the war.
We cannot blame them for looking out for what they believe to be their own interests, but we also must look out for ours. We cannot allow the natural passions and prejudices of other peoples to lead our country to destruction.
The issue, as Lindbergh notes, is that we have a clear instance of divergent interests. Here is how I [see it]: 1) Jewish interests are in conflict with those of the majority. 2) For this reason, Jews generally conceal their machinations from the public.
The Lindbergh episode is also a classic instance of #2. There was a huge uproar over this factually accurate speech and the Jews mobilised against him immediately and vociferously.
Lindbergh's wife wrote in her diary that her husband's crime was merely to "name" the Jew. Q: But what's so bad about accurately describing what Jews are doing and accurately identifying them as Jews?
A: Because doing that pulls back the curtain and the egregious conflict of interest is revealed.
Jews were never going to be upfront and say, "Hey, we're Jews and we hate Hitler because he's mean to Jews so we want you to fight and die over in Europe to get rid of him for us". They knew that wouldn't work.
This definition demonstrates how this racist, slanderous anti-German narrative is not a genuine ‘history’.
“... any attempt to negate [correct or even question] the establishedfacts [legally-protected, compulsory belief claiming] the Nazi genocide of European Jews is regarded as ‘Holocaust denial’...”
There we have the proof that this drive, led by Jewish organisations, has declared there NOW to be certain basic, cult-like beliefs that it is forbidden to make ANY attempt whatsoever to question, critically analyse or doubt.
When we KNOW with absolute surety that many, many Jews defintely DID “exaggerate”, the following statement is further proof that the use of the anti-semite ad hominem smear is a calculated deception to deter genuine investigation:
...H denial and distortion generally claim that the Holocaust was invented or exaggerated by Jews as part of a plot to advance Jewish interests.
Here is another clear deceit:
...H denial and distortion are forms of antisemitism, prejudice against or hatred of Jews...
This is another brazen lie. Sure, there definitely ARE some who doubt the accuracy of this WW2 atrocity narrative and hold a prejudice against and dislike people because they are perceived as being ‘Jewish’. But that does not mean that everybody who doubts this narrative has that attitude! This is an extremely simple point of logic.
And the proof this also is false, is the film of Ernst Zündel being interviewed by two Jews from Israel. His whole bearing towards them, the things he said, they way he responded to their accusations would convince any honest, fair-minded person that Ernst had absolutely no enmity, ill-will or prejudice against them.
And anyway, so what if some H-skeptics DO harbour a racist prejudice?
It is as though the flat-Earth society declared that the planet Earth was defintely flat because all who believed otherwise were paedophiles, misogynists and drug abusers.
Well surely some are. But that OBVIOUSLY doesn’t prove the world isn’t a sphere!