Nessie
๐ฆ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ (Nessies forum)
Posts: 4,834
|
Post by Nessie on Feb 14, 2022 11:45:39 GMT
So, no names of Jews who gave eyewitness testimony of their own free will to the atrocities of Treblinka or links to that testimony. Another weasel dodge from Nessie. Gee, whoda' thunk it? Stop lying, here are the names and links to testimony AGAIN. I made that thread because you lie so often that I do not give you names and links.
|
|
Turnagain
โ๏ธ
๐๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐๐
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Feb 14, 2022 12:29:17 GMT
Wait a minute, are you actually claiming that Wiernik wrote nothing but the truth in his book, "A Year in Treblinka"? Or, are you saying that he may have "exaggerated" a little or used some "hyperbole" to enhance what was essentially a truthful narrative? That Rosenberg gave truthful testimony about the hermetically sealed gas chamber? Or did he just make a "little mistake"?
Going through your laundry list produces an untold number of fantasies and lies and you actually believe them? That is almost beyond belief but your claim that I, a somewhat rational person, should believe them also is one of the most bizarre statements I've ever heard. An excerpt from the USHMM interview with Bomba:
The tales of just Wiernik and Bomba make the fairy tales of the brothers Grimm, the childhood fantasy of Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny seem sober and true narratives. You are either lying about believing such claptrap or you're truly unhinged.
|
|
Nessie
๐ฆ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ (Nessies forum)
Posts: 4,834
|
Post by Nessie on Feb 14, 2022 15:16:49 GMT
Wait a minute, are you actually claiming that Wiernik wrote nothing but the truth in his book, "A Year in Treblinka"? Or, are you saying that he may have "exaggerated" a little or used some "hyperbole" to enhance what was essentially a truthful narrative? That Rosenberg gave truthful testimony about the hermetically sealed gas chamber? Or did he just make a "little mistake"? Going through your laundry list produces an untold number of fantasies and lies and you actually believe them? That is almost beyond belief but your claim that I, a somewhat rational person, should believe them also is one of the most bizarre statements I've ever heard. An excerpt from the USHMM interview with Bomba: The tales of just Wiernik and Bomba make the fairy tales of the brothers Grimm, the childhood fantasy of Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny seem sober and true narratives. You are either lying about believing such claptrap or you're truly unhinged.
Why do insist on using arguments from incredulity, when you have been shown that such arguments are logical fallacies?
You need evidence, not fallacious arguments.
|
|
Turnagain
โ๏ธ
๐๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐๐
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Feb 14, 2022 15:26:30 GMT
Nessie wrote:
Because I don't use "arguments from incredulity" and you've shown no "logical fallacies". Quit your attempting to bullshit.
|
|
Nessie
๐ฆ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ (Nessies forum)
Posts: 4,834
|
Post by Nessie on Feb 14, 2022 15:43:32 GMT
Nessie wrote: Because I don't use "arguments from incredulity" and you've shown no "logical fallacies". Quit your attempting to bullshit. You use arguments from incredulity all of the time. You constantly compare what is claimed to have happened to a boy cycling to the moon. Every time you do that, you are arguing from incredulity.
"Argument from incredulity, also known as personal incredulity fallacy, is a logical fallacy in which someone concludes that something must not be true (or false) since they cannot believe or imagine it being true (or false)."
You cannot believe the gassing, mass graves and pyre claims are true, because you cannot see how they were done based on your very literal interpretation of the witness descriptions.
|
|
Turnagain
โ๏ธ
๐๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐๐
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Feb 14, 2022 17:35:26 GMT
Nessie wrote:
You obviously don't even comprehend what an argument from incredulity means. Little boys don't ride their tricycles to the moon because someone just doesn't believe it. It's a fact that little boys can't ride their tricycles to the moon. I don't believe that the M&H dragline dug the graves because it's physically impossible for it to do so. Not because just for no reason at all except for I don't believe it. Neither do I believe Rajchman when he claims that the air was pumped out of the gas chamber before the engine exhaust was let in. That's not "just because I don't believe it". It's because it's well established that even a partial vacuum will collapse a steel or aluminum tank. "Argument from incredulity" my shiny hiney. Try to comprehend what you read, Nessie.
|
|
Nessie
๐ฆ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ (Nessies forum)
Posts: 4,834
|
Post by Nessie on Feb 14, 2022 19:10:16 GMT
Nessie wrote: You obviously don't even comprehend what an argument from incredulity means. Little boys don't ride their tricycles to the moon because someone just doesn't believe it. It's a fact that little boys can't ride their tricycles to the moon. Correct, they cannot. But the Germans can build gas chambers, dig big pits and set pyres. They could do far more complicated work than that, so what is being alleged is not physically impossible to do. The British could have also worked out how to build gas chambers, dig big pits and set pyres, as their construction and engineering capability was easily capable of such work. The logical conclusion to that is the M&H dragline was not used, not that all the witnesses lied and no pits were dug. Rajchman said that people were still alive after being in overnight, so not much of the air was pumped out, so nothing like a vacuum was created. That he then thought the air was pumped out before the exhaust was pumped in was wrong. You cannot logically conclude he was lying and it did not happen, since he could also just be wrong. Your lack of understanding of logic is why you have fallen for the argument from incredulity. It is a fact that the Germans could build gas chambers, dig big pits and set pyres. You have agreed with that. Your issue is how the witnesses describe what happened. You think that because of the way witnesses describe the workings, those chambers, pits and pyres were impossible and did not happen. You also concentrate on the method that did not work and ignore the method that did. What is being alleged is possible, it is just how they describe what they saw that makes it appear to not be possible.
|
|
Turnagain
โ๏ธ
๐๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐๐
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Feb 15, 2022 7:27:29 GMT
Nessie wrote:
Whether the Germans could build gas chambers, dig big pits and cremate cadavers has no relevance to the events that supposedly took place at Treblinka. Nessie tries to connect the German's capabilities specifically to the hermetically sealed gas chambers, the 12X30X50 meter graves supposedly dug by the M&H draglines and the cremation of hundreds of thousands using only twigs etc. for fuel. Could the Germans dig big pits? Of course they could. What the hell does that have to do with 12X30X50 meter pits being dug with a M&H dragline? Absolutely nothing! Zip, zero, nada.
Nessie then goes on to say:
Arad, CS-C, ARC et al. all claim that the M&H draglines from T-I were used to dig the graves. It's claimed that there are photos of those draglines digging the graves at Treblinka. Nessie and ONLY Nessie claims that some other type of equipment dug the graves at Treblinka.
Nessie knows absolutely nothing about his machine that supposedly dug the graves at Treblinka. He doesn't even know what kind of machine it was. No make, no model, no nada. Just some kind of magical mystery machine that could both excavate and stockpile the ex from the graves. Anyone who doesn't believe Nessie implicitly is guilty of a fallacy of incredulity.
Rajchman said that after 48 hours in the gas chamber that had the air pumped out of it, there were some people who "showed signs of life". Rajchman claimed that the new gas chambers were 7X7 meters and held about 400 people. (That's curious since he claimed that the old gas chambers were 5X5 meters and held 400-500 victims.) There's not enough oxygen in a 7X7 meter chamber to sustain 400 people for two days so we know that Rajchman was lying about people surviving. Was he lying about the air being pumped out of the chambers before the engine exhaust was let in? Of course he was.
Rajchman wasn't "wrong" about how the gas chamber functioned. There wasn't any gas chamber and Rajchman's fantasies are just bullshit. Nessie seems to think that he can pile enough "what ifs", "coulda woulda", "mistakes", "exaggerations" and "hyperbole" on the bizarre lies of the alleged eyewitnesses to make such fantasies believable. Add Nessie's non sequitur of, "The Germans could dig big pits, etc." and we come up with a big, fat, nothing-burger.
|
|
Nessie
๐ฆ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ (Nessies forum)
Posts: 4,834
|
Post by Nessie on Feb 15, 2022 9:34:01 GMT
Nessie wrote: Whether the Germans could build gas chambers, dig big pits and cremate cadavers has no relevance to the events that supposedly took place at Treblinka. Nessie tries to connect the German's capabilities specifically to the hermetically sealed gas chambers, the 12X30X50 meter graves supposedly dug by the M&H draglines and the cremation of hundreds of thousands using only twigs etc. for fuel. Could the Germans dig big pits? Of course they could. What the hell does that have to do with 12X30X50 meter pits being dug with a M&H dragline? Absolutely nothing! Zip, zero, nada. Nessie then goes on to say: Arad, CS-C, ARC et al. all claim that the M&H draglines from T-I were used to dig the graves. It's claimed that there are photos of those draglines digging the graves at Treblinka. Nessie and ONLY Nessie claims that some other type of equipment dug the graves at Treblinka. Nessie knows absolutely nothing about his machine that supposedly dug the graves at Treblinka. He doesn't even know what kind of machine it was. No make, no model, no nada. Just some kind of magical mystery machine that could both excavate and stockpile the ex from the graves. Anyone who doesn't believe Nessie implicitly is guilty of a fallacy of incredulity. Rajchman said that after 48 hours in the gas chamber that had the air pumped out of it, there were some people who "showed signs of life". Rajchman claimed that the new gas chambers were 7X7 meters and held about 400 people. (That's curious since he claimed that the old gas chambers were 5X5 meters and held 400-500 victims.) There's not enough oxygen in a 7X7 meter chamber to sustain 400 people for two days so we know that Rajchman was lying about people surviving. Was he lying about the air being pumped out of the chambers before the engine exhaust was let in? Of course he was. Rajchman wasn't "wrong" about how the gas chamber functioned. There wasn't any gas chamber and Rajchman's fantasies are just bullshit. Nessie seems to think that he can pile enough "what ifs", "coulda woulda", "mistakes", "exaggerations" and "hyperbole" on the bizarre lies of the alleged eyewitnesses to make such fantasies believable. Add Nessie's non sequitur of, "The Germans could dig big pits, etc." and we come up with a big, fat, nothing-burger. It does not matter that you do not believe the witness descriptions. That is not how to accurately determine if what they described happened or not.
|
|
Turnagain
โ๏ธ
๐๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐๐
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Feb 15, 2022 10:55:43 GMT
Nessie wrote:
Right, the little boy rode his tricycle to the moon and it doesn't make any difference whether you believe it or not. Like Church dogma, "Believe so that you may understand".
|
|
Nessie
๐ฆ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ (Nessies forum)
Posts: 4,834
|
Post by Nessie on Feb 15, 2022 12:50:00 GMT
Nessie wrote: Right, the little boy rode his tricycle to the moon and it doesn't make any difference whether you believe it or not. Like Church dogma, "Believe so that you may understand".
You are happy to believe that the AR camps and A-B Kremas were only used for transit purposes and c2.5 million people were transported elsewhere, without any evidence of that happening. You believe in something incredible, which is not evidenced, which is the definition of a religious faith.
|
|
Turnagain
โ๏ธ
๐๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐๐
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Feb 15, 2022 19:06:06 GMT
Nessie wrote:
Nessie can't seem to comprehend that it isn't true that the Germans murdered Jews as official government policy. He takes that as a given. The basis for that accusation was the Hoess "confession" and that confession is as fraudulent as any confession extracted from a victim of the Spanish Inquisition. It's an article of faith with Nessie that the Hoess confession was a genuine from the heart confession, freely given and the justification for the persecution of those "eeevul Narzis". Was the holyhoax a great crime? It was indeed but it wasn't perpetrated on the Jews.
|
|
Nessie
๐ฆ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ (Nessies forum)
Posts: 4,834
|
Post by Nessie on Feb 15, 2022 19:36:30 GMT
Nessie wrote: Nessie can't seem to comprehend that it isn't true that the Germans murdered Jews as official government policy. He takes that as a given. Are you also denying the mass shootings by the EG in the former Soviet occupied territory? Like gassings, mass shootings are evidenced. I have never used Hoess as evidence. His confession is not the basis of the Holocaust claims.
|
|
Turnagain
โ๏ธ
๐๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐๐
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Feb 15, 2022 20:17:32 GMT
That partisans were shot isn't a question. Your claim that Jews were shot for being Jews is bullshit. Were there excesses? Of course there were but there was no official government policy that Jews were to be shot.
Is it credible that the Jews were gassed with either Zyklon B or CO from the exhaust from an ICE? Of course not. Nessie declares his make believe "evidence" is proof that holyhoax actually occurred. Nessie is full of more [excrement] than a Christmas goose.
Nessie wrote:
Lemme' see I have have this straight. The Hoess confession had nothing to do with amy of the subsequent prosecutions of alleged war crimes. Is that what your claiming?
|
|
Nessie
๐ฆ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ (Nessies forum)
Posts: 4,834
|
Post by Nessie on Feb 15, 2022 20:22:01 GMT
That partisans were shot isn't a question. Your claim that Jews were shot for being Jews is bullshit. Were there excesses? Of course there were but there was no official government policy that Jews were to be shot. The EG OSRs listed the number of Jews shot separately from the Communists and partisans. The Jews were as much an enemy as the Communists and partisans. What is better, evidence or opinion? The Hoess prosecution was not a test case to see if other prosecutions should be brought against the Nazis. Even without hos confession, there is overwhelming evidence of mass gassings at A-B.
|
|