Nessie
đŚ
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż (Nessies forum)
Posts: 4,834
|
Post by Nessie on Jan 8, 2022 17:24:40 GMT
What can't you comprehend about gallons of gasoline poured over a huge pile of bodies would result in a massive explosion? I've posted the "Redneck bonfire" video numerous times. Haven't you watched it? A guy empties a five gallon can of gasoline over a pile of refuse and then sets a some debris alight and tosses it onto the pile of gasoline soaked refuse. Instant explosion. Why can't you understand the connection between the gasoline and the explosion? Why can't you understand that pouring gallons of gasoline over the pile of bodies would give the same result? There are lots of videos of Rednecks setting bonfires on fire, by splashing petrol all over the place and then immediately setting it alight, to create that effect. A more controlled use of petrol, which has been allowed to soak in, will not flare up like that. If you accept a body will be cremated just with some fuel and its clothing, you are accepting it is possible to create with less fuel than the likes of the Hindu pyres use. A small amount of petrol to get the Dresden pyres started, would also work. You are contradicting yourself. You admit careful and controlled use would cremate corpse, but then pretend it is not possible to also be careful and controlled with a pyre. You have no evidence the Dresden bodies were cremated individually, just lying about the ground at the Altmarkt. You ahev ignored the photos that show piles of ashes next to the pyres. |
|
Turnagain
âď¸
đđźđťđźđżđŽđđđ
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Jan 8, 2022 18:25:18 GMT
Nessie wrote:
Gasoline fumes are heavier than air and will sink to the spaces below it. So, prove your asinine claim.
The bodies would be charred as in for hygienic purposes. The officials were afraid of a typhus outbreak not total cremation and pulverizing for body disposal.
\
Irving said "gallons" as in multiple gallons of gasoline. Roberto Muehlenkamp once estimated that it would take over 60,000 liters of gasoline to cremate the cadavers at Dresden.
You claim that the piles are burned bones. Prove it. Suppositions and speculations aren't enough.
|
|
Nessie
đŚ
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż (Nessies forum)
Posts: 4,834
|
Post by Nessie on Jan 8, 2022 19:07:52 GMT
Nessie wrote: Gasoline fumes are heavier than air and will sink to the spaces below it. So, prove your asinine claim. You have accepted it is possible to use petrol to safely start a fire, with your claim that individual bodies were cremated that way! Start a fire safely with gasoline
He pours some on and then lets it sit for a few minutes, then lights it. You are ignoring that you have claimed it is possible to safely light a fire with petrol. You have no evidence they set fire to individual bodies for hygiene purposes. That does not mean they poured gallons on to each pyre. They cremated c6800 corpses, in pyres of around 100 per pyre, going by the photos. It is the right colour and consistency to be burnt cremains and ashes. If suppositions and speculations are not enough, why do you use them so often? |
|
Turnagain
âď¸
đđźđťđźđżđŽđđđ
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Jan 9, 2022 0:24:18 GMT
Nessie compares someone using about a quart of gasoline on a brush pile to who knows how many gallons being poured on a pile of fully clothed bodies. As usual, Nessie weasel dodges the issue.
Nessie then states:
Nessie has no proof of what the piles of material is but as usual, comes up with another weasel dodge.
|
|
Nessie
đŚ
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż (Nessies forum)
Posts: 4,834
|
Post by Nessie on Jan 9, 2022 12:40:25 GMT
Nessie compares someone using about a quart of gasoline on a brush pile to who knows how many gallons being poured on a pile of fully clothed bodies. As usual, Nessie weasel dodges the issue. Nessie then states: Nessie has no proof of what the piles of material is but as usual, comes up with another weasel dodge. Piles of lighter material, next to pyres, in a place where cremations were reported, whereby the ashes were transported to local cemeteries, and you claim there is not enough evidence. The more evidence i produce, the more you move the goalposts and claim, not enough!
Yet you happily believe in so much there is no evidence for at all 
The evidence of the pyres at Dresden is supporting evidence that the very similar method described by multiple witnesses at the AR camps, can be made to work.
|
|
Turnagain
âď¸
đđźđťđźđżđŽđđđ
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Jan 9, 2022 13:01:05 GMT
Nessie wrote:
Uh-huh, an improbability supports an impossibility. Life in holyhoax la-la land.
|
|
Nessie
đŚ
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż (Nessies forum)
Posts: 4,834
|
Post by Nessie on Jan 9, 2022 16:38:04 GMT
Nessie wrote: Uh-huh, an improbability supports an impossibility. Life in holyhoax la-la land. No, evidence from photos, documents and witnesses beat your suppositions and speculations. Remember, you said that you need proof, not suppositions and speculations. Proof comes from contemporaneous evidence and you have none. |
|
Turnagain
âď¸
đđźđťđźđżđŽđđđ
Posts: 2,302
|
Post by Turnagain on Jan 9, 2022 21:05:29 GMT
Nessie demands that I believe his bullshit.
|
|
Nessie
đŚ
đđđ§đđŤđđđ˘đĽđ˘đŹ đŽđąđˇđđąđśđ°đŽđđźđż (Nessies forum)
Posts: 4,834
|
Post by Nessie on Jan 10, 2022 8:45:37 GMT
Nessie demands that I believe his bullshit. The difference between us, is I can evidence my "bullshit", whereas your "bullshit" is unevidenced speculation based on arguments using logical fallacies. |
|
