With us or against us. Dec 22, 2021 16:14:09 GMT
Post by Nessie on Dec 22, 2021 16:14:09 GMT
There is plenty of evidence it happened. That you have a series of excuses to dismiss that evidence, is why you think there is no proof. For all academics and anyone who understands evidencing and logic, that evidence proves mass gassings.
There is no evidence at all of the only alternative to gassings. You try to claim the occasional transports reported of people to go to other labour camps in Poland is evidence TII was a transit camp, but that is wrong. It is evidence of the selection process that was also evidenced to have happened at the other AR camps and A-B.
First you claim to have "evidence" and then complain that I won't accept it as proof of mass murder. IOW, you say that little boys ride tricycles and then demand that I accept that as proof that the little boy rode his tricycle to the moon.
False analogy. Your mantra of a boy cycling to the moon, applies to what is physically impossible, under all circumstances, to do. You accept that the Germans could build gas chambers, dig big pits and cremate on pyres, you just do not believe the witness descriptions of how each happened. Your disbelief does not make the witness claims about gassings, burials and pyres happening physically impossible.
As far as me being the only person who doesn't accept your "evidencing" that's complete bull[excrement]. Nick Kollerstrom and Art Butz are just two academics who don't accept your mindless claptrap as "proof" of the holyhoax.
I was not saying it was just you, I said it was anyone who does not understand evidencing and logic, which includes a few academics, who have fallen for the Holocaust denier hoax.
You first admit that Jews did in fact leave Treblinka for other destinations and then declare that it isn't evidence of Jews leaving Treblinka for other destinations. I suppose that makes sense to you.
I have always pointed out that the evidence of Jews leaving TII is ONLY evidence of a selection process, whereby some were sent to work on labour camps in Poland. That makes sense, so you misrepresent what I said, because you cannot argue against my claim. The witness you have used the most, Helen Schwartz, was clear that she was picked along with other girls to go to a labour camp in Poland. You then claim she is not evidence of selections. That only makes sense to you!