|
|
Post by ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐๐ด๐ป๐ธ on Sept 17, 2023 6:38:56 GMT
Quote him saying he saw an execution. Why did he not report seeing trains leaving the camp packed full of people? I said he had evidence of executions not that he saw one. Are you having issues with comprehension LCS? Why should a judenlager attached to T1 have trains of people leaving? As this was a judenlager that applies. I think I made it abundantly clear the 100% correlation of the association between extended train stops and Jewish labour camps while on route to the Treblinka station with only some on the transport arriving at Treblinka station. |
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,210 
|
Post by Nessie on Sept 17, 2023 9:19:16 GMT
Quote him saying he saw an execution. Why did he not report seeing trains leaving the camp packed full of people? I said he had evidence of executions not that he saw one. Are you having issues with comprehension LCS? You said that he saw evidence of legitimate executions, so quote him to establish if your claim is a reasonable conclusion. You missed out the inconvenient part about him not talking about mass transports back out of the camp. There is not a 100% correlation between stops on the way to TII, and a labour camp. You have not gone through every stop and directly linked it to a named labour camp that you can evidence took people from those trains. |
|
|
|
Post by ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐๐ด๐ป๐ธ on Sept 17, 2023 9:39:42 GMT
There is not a 100% correlation between stops on the way to TII, and a labour camp. You have not gone through every stop and directly linked it to a named labour camp that you can evidence took people from those trains. I have correlated every Fplo and every stop with either Labour camps or junctions to other labour camps. As trains were the only method of transportation it is obvious that this is the method to get people to labour camps. |
|
|
|
Post by ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐๐ด๐ป๐ธ on Sept 17, 2023 9:47:09 GMT
You said that he saw evidence of legitimate executions, so quote him to establish if your claim is a reasonable conclusion. You missed out the inconvenient part about him not talking about mass transports back out of the camp. If one says he knew that executions occurred, he somehow saw that evidence, whatever that evidence may be. There is some reliance on this mans integrity which is more than people like yourself can say about atrocity witnesses you promulgate. It is explained that the current TII was a judenlager not the place you think it was. If there was a death camp of horror it was not there. I gave you an outage and put in Podlaski which you refuse to acknowledge despite the elders of the town pin pointing that location. If you refuse to investigate but just try and throw in blocks then get lost. You simply troll to support a lost cause. |
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Sept 17, 2023 9:55:51 GMT
There is not a 100% correlation between stops on the way to TII, and a labour camp. You have not gone through every stop and directly linked it to a named labour camp that you can evidence took people from those trains. I have correlated every Fplo and every stop with either Labour camps or junctions to other labour camps. As trains were the only method of transportation it is obvious that this is the method to get people to labour camps. You have not. You have not stated the name of each stop, the name of the corresponding labour camp and shown evidence of people leaving the train and going to that camp. You have instead cobbled together some evidence of transports from ghettos of workers, to labour camps, which are unrelated to the AR camp transports. |
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Sept 17, 2023 9:57:17 GMT
You said that he saw evidence of legitimate executions, so quote him to establish if your claim is a reasonable conclusion. You missed out the inconvenient part about him not talking about mass transports back out of the camp. If one says he knew that executions occurred, he somehow saw that evidence, whatever that evidence may be. There is some reliance on this mans integrity which is more than people like yourself can say about atrocity witnesses you promulgate. It is explained that the current TII was a judenlager not the place you think it was. If there was a death camp of horror it was not there. I gave you an outage and put in Podlaski which you refuse to acknowledge despite the elders of the town pin pointing that location. If you refuse to investigate but just try and throw in blocks then get lost. You simply troll to support a lost cause. To get back on topic, this is an example of why you have fallen for the denier hoax. You want it to be true, to you imagine the evidence is in your favour, but when asked to show that evidence, you cannot. |
|
|
|
Post by ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐๐ด๐ป๐ธ on Sept 17, 2023 10:01:06 GMT
You are not reading all the reports given. You are just doing anything to support a failed belief system. On the balance of things the labour camp investigation is solid. If you have nothing to add that is new best to say nothing. You are not giving new information but acting like a teen age girl in heat.
|
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Sept 17, 2023 18:46:05 GMT
You are not reading all the reports given. You are just doing anything to support a failed belief system. On the balance of things the labour camp investigation is solid. If you have nothing to add that is new best to say nothing. You are not giving new information but acting like a teen age girl in heat. This thread is about how the hoax works. It works because you have decided you want to believe it and you cobble together evidence that supports your belief. |
|
|
|
Post by ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐๐ด๐ป๐ธ on Sept 29, 2023 6:03:15 GMT
Evidence contrary to Nessie's belief system must be default be wrong or unimportant. Speaks volumes.
|
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Sept 29, 2023 7:29:13 GMT
Evidence contrary to Nessie's belief system must be default be wrong or unimportant. Speaks volumes. Can you give me an example of such evidence? |
|
|
|
Post by ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐๐ด๐ป๐ธ on Sept 29, 2023 7:32:48 GMT
Evidence contrary to Nessie's belief system must be default be wrong or unimportant. Speaks volumes. Can you give me an example of such evidence? Olszuk |
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Sept 29, 2023 10:55:51 GMT
Can you give me an example of such evidence? Olszuk Just because he did not see anything he thought suspicious, does not therefore mean TII was not a death camp. He provides circumstantial evidence of the mass graves, due to the terrible smell, the burning of clothes, which is consistent with people being killed and he fails to mention anyone being transported back out of the camp, so he does not support denier claims. |
|
|
|
Post by ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐๐ด๐ป๐ธ on Sept 29, 2023 18:05:57 GMT
ust because he did not see anything he thought suspicious, does not therefore mean TII was not a death camp. He provides circumstantial evidence of the mass graves, due to the terrible smell, the burning of clothes, which is consistent with people being killed and he fails to mention anyone being transported back out of the camp, so he does not support denier claims. A camp where it is claimed thousands were burned each day, he saw nothing, certainly not mass arrivals. A single bad smell means nothing; the stench would be more permanent if the claim were true. The point is that Olszuk is dismissed when he states he saw no evidence of mass murder. A guy who worked in close proximity and could see through the camp. Claiming that this camp was not a place of mass murder does not make one a denier; there was a camp down the road at Podlaski that the town elders claim was the location of a death camp. Delusionists like yourself fail to take heed of that evidence. |
|
Nessie
โ๏ธ
๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ
Posts: 5,210
|
Post by Nessie on Sept 30, 2023 7:31:48 GMT
ust because he did not see anything he thought suspicious, does not therefore mean TII was not a death camp. He provides circumstantial evidence of the mass graves, due to the terrible smell, the burning of clothes, which is consistent with people being killed and he fails to mention anyone being transported back out of the camp, so he does not support denier claims. A camp where it is claimed thousands were burned each day, he saw nothing, certainly not mass arrivals. A single bad smell means nothing; the stench would be more permanent if the claim were true. The point is that Olszuk is dismissed when he states he saw no evidence of mass murder. A guy who worked in close proximity and could see through the camp. Claiming that this camp was not a place of mass murder does not make one a denier; there was a camp down the road at Podlaski that the town elders claim was the location of a death camp. Delusionists like yourself fail to take heed of that evidence. Olszuk is not being ignored. Faurisson failed to ask him key questions, primarily about transports, so we do not know what he saw. You are lying when you suggest he could "see through the camp". The little Olszuk did speak about is still consistent with TII as a death camp. Please name and quote a town elder who said Podlaski was a death camp. |
|
|
|
Post by ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐๐ด๐ป๐ธ on Sept 30, 2023 18:31:27 GMT
Olszuk is not being ignored. Faurisson failed to ask him key questions, primarily about transports, so we do not know what he saw. You are lying when you suggest he could "see through the camp". The little Olszuk did speak about is still consistent with TII as a death camp. Please name and quote a town elder who said Podlaski was a death camp. This has been discussed prior. link The elders gave the location of a death camp south of their town, whereas the current TII is somewhat north. Podlaski is the extermination camp also mentioned by the CIA and fits in with the location. Podlaski would be considered a Treblinka camp. I think the poster has issues with basic comprehension. The issue is that people like the poster constantly brings up transports. Most people interested and not trying to proselytize when faced with the extended transport stops at labour camps etc would consider that "hey something else is going on". All the poster above does is say "prove they didn't get off". He is well aware that the labour camp transports and the Fahrplananordnung documents are one and the same in all probability. Of course as the readers know, the poster above is not "most people" but definitely one of a kind. |
|
