“When you earnestly resolve to [seek Truth], the Devil in your nature cries out at you:
Don’t go in that direction! Think again, oh misguided one! For you will become a prisoner to distress and poverty. You will become destitute. You will be cut off from friends. You will be despised. You will regret it!”
From fear of the outcry of that accursed Devil you flee away from certain truth into error.
Ever wondered what official state propaganda agencies would be called after the demonisation of Joe Gœbbels for being head of the Third Reich’s Ministry of Propaganda?
It was always going to be tricky, after they slagged off Joe for making sure the German people were kept enthused, informed, and confident during the war that was waged against them by World Jewry using proxies.
And it was going to be even harder after George Orwell’s book 1984.
Calling their departments for information-control 'The Ministry of Truth' would be too obvious.
Sweden has gone with 'Myndigheten för Psykologiskt Försvar’ (Agency for Psychological Defence):
Myndigheten kommer att leda arbetet med att samordna och utveckla myndigheters och andra aktörers verksamhet inom Sveriges psykologiska försvar, lämna stöd till sådan verksamhet och bidra till att stärka befolkningens motståndskraft. Myndigheten kommer att ha dessa uppgifter både i fredstid och under höjd beredskap.
En viktig del i myndighetens arbete kommer vara att stärka den samlade förmågan att identifiera och möta otillbörlig informationspåverkan och annan spridning av vilseledande information riktad mot Sverige.
Core Mission: To direct, lead, synchronize, integrate, and coordinate efforts of the Federal Government to recognize, understand, expose, and counter foreign state and non-state propaganda and disinformation efforts aimed at undermining or influencing the policies, security, or stability of the United States, its allies, and partner nations.
Vision: A data-driven Mission Center leading U.S. inter-agency efforts to proactively address foreign adversaries’ attempts to use disinformation and propaganda to undermine U.S. interests.
A decade before the quasi-religous, obligatory ‘Holycaust’ belief-system took hold of western society, a British philosopher was warning against the majority forcing its views upon everyone.
He was directing his comments at religions and their control over freedom of expression.
Little did he know what was coming with the elevation of a racist, anti-German, pseudo historical hate-trope that distorted the WW2 Jewish experience, that became a compulsory, thought-controlled ‘belief’ starting with the illegal kidnapping, illegal transporting and world-televised sham trial of Adolf Eichmann in 1961.
"The fact that the majority of a community dislikes an opinion gives it no right to interfere with those who hold it.
And the fact that the majority of a community wishes not to know certain facts gives it no right to imprison those who wish to know them.
These propositions may seem mild and unadorned, yet, if accepted, they would absolutely revolutionise human life."
~~ Bertrand Russell, Sceptical Essays (1958), Essay. XIII: Freedom in Society, p. 151
Blast from the past (1999). A small excerpt from an excellent article by Brian A. Renk exposing the fraudulence, dishonesty and credulity of ‘holyco$t’ historians:
...Holocaust ‘historians’ present their thesis as being essentially "unquestionable" and converge on their exclusionist colloquia, all the while contradicting one another's theses on the most salient of points, and making claims that are not supported by the documents they cite – if they cite any at all. They posture themselves in manners that reek of credulity and dishonesty. Above all, they become stone-cold silent when they are confronted with evidence which does not fit their theses. My exchanges with Fleming and, more recently, Browning, confirm that. (I will present the exchange with Browning a little later in this talk).
This is not what should be expected from the world's authorities in any discipline, let alone one of the most controversial topics of our time, a subject which is desperately in need of honest appraisal and revision, albeit with a certain amount of humility and respect for victims of persecution — and I speak now of past victims and of today's victims of persecution: the scientists and scholars who are asking the right questions, undertaking the right studies for history — the men and women who are uncovering the distortions of the past and the ersatz "history" of the present based on those distortions, which no longer serve to protect the victims of the past.
It is my conviction that, shorn of its political umbrage, revisionism-in-itself is a humanistic undertaking, a discipline which, in its pure form, can foster greater understanding between individuals and nations which were bitter enemies in times past. The guardians of the "shrine of truth" have become the jailers of truth, the enemies of open discussion and reconciliation. We must overcome the "bankruptcy of the traditional history" – which has become both morally and scholarly bankrupt – for Revisionism is a Humanism. (If we cannot hold honestly-held opinions which are not borne of hatred, but of intellectual curiosity, then we have lost our humanity, our legacy of Humanism in the western world. We will lose our love of wisdom, our philosophia, we will wither on the vine of wisdom).
Paul Rassinier, is known as the father of Holocaust revisionism. He did a very great service to mankind and the eternal quest for truth and justice. As at the end of the second world war, Rassinier heard stories he KNEW to be FALSE!!! Paul Rassanier was a former French partisan fighter who was captured and became an inmate of Buchenwald and Dora concentration camps. His reaction to hearing stories of the alleged mechanised exterminations of Jews in Buchenwald led him to make the very first critical analysis of the emerging myth of a Jew genocide in gas chambers. That was because the atrocity propagands of a gas-chamber genocide by ‘Nazis’ at Buchenwald he knew to be untrue because he had been there at Buchenwald. It occurred to him that if Jewish camp survivors and the victorious Allied could lie about Buchenwald, what else were they lieing about?
Here is what he wrote about so-called ’eye-witnesses’ of mass-gassings:
"For 15 years, every time that I heard of a witness anywhere — no matter where in the portion of Europe that was not occupied by the Soviets — who claimed to have himself been present at gas exterminations, I immediately went to him to get his testimony.
With documentation in hand, I would ask him so many precise and detailed questions that soon it became apparent that he could not answer except by lying. Often his lies became so transparent, even to himself, that he ended his testimony by declaring that he had not seen it himself, but that one of his good friends, who had died in the camps and whose good faith he could not doubt, had told him about it. I covered thousands and thousands of kilometers throughout Europe in this way."
— Paul Rassanier. The Holocaust Story and the Lies of Ulysses Chapter Thirteen: Witnesses, Testimonies, and Documents