Bungled: Germar Rudolf

Discuss the alleged Nazi genocide or other wartime atrocities without fear of censorship. No bullying of fellow posters is allowed at RODOH. If you can't be civil, please address the argument and not the participants. Do not use disparaging alterations of the user-names of other RODOH posters or their family members. Failure to heed warnings from Moderators will result in a 24 hour ban (or longer if necessary).
Post Reply
User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 4916
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh. Swabia
Contact:

Bungled: Germar Rudolf

Post by Huntinger » Sun Nov 10, 2019 5:06 am

A new poster called "Chocolate" is challenging the various individuals at "Klowns". Instead of staying on topic, they of course brag how many books they have read; I think one may understand their continual Habiru arrogance.
"Chocolate" mentioned a book he or she had read called Fail: "Denying the Holocaust": How Deborah Lipstadt Botched Her Attempt to Demonstrate the Growing Assault on Truth and Memory.
Image
The one with the Turkey avatar (which is fitting) asked "Chocolate" if the poster had read the book to which it replied:
chocolate wrote: I haven't. She is not a researcher on the policies of the Third Reich and she refuses to directly engage with those she disagrees.
I found a few moments ago that this book is available on Holocaust Handbooks for free for those interested. This is called
Bungled Denying the Holocaust How Deborah Lipstadt Botched Her Attempt to Demonstrate the Growing Assault on Truth and Memory.

This book is worth discussing. I suggest one chapter at a time.
π•²π–Šπ–π–Šπ–Žπ–’π–Š π•Ύπ–™π–†π–†π–™π–˜π–•π–”π–‘π–Žπ–Ÿπ–Šπ–Ž π–‹π–šΜˆπ–— π–‰π–Šπ–“ π•Ύπ–Žπ–ˆπ–π–Šπ–—π–π–Šπ–Žπ–™π–˜π–‰π–Žπ–Šπ–“π–˜π–™

rollo the ganger
Posts: 6207
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:34 am
Contact:

Re: Bungled: Germar Rudolf

Post by rollo the ganger » Sun Nov 10, 2019 9:35 am

You piqued my interest Huntinger regarding the conversations the poster "Chocolate" was making over at the Klown Show so I decided to take a "peek" myself. Yesterday's conversation there with Chocolate and the Klowns went on for a couple of pages and it sounded as if he had walked in to a forest full of Howler Monkeys screaming in protest at his presence. He tried to get an intelligent conversation going but the Klowns would have nothing of it.

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 4916
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh. Swabia
Contact:

Re: Bungled: Germar Rudolf

Post by Huntinger » Sun Nov 10, 2019 2:31 pm

rollo the ganger wrote: ↑
Sun Nov 10, 2019 9:35 am
You piqued my interest Huntinger regarding the conversations the poster "Chocolate" was making over at the Klown Show so I decided to take a "peek" myself. Yesterday's conversation there with Chocolate and the Klowns went on for a couple of pages and it sounded as if he had walked in to a forest full of Howler Monkeys screaming in protest at his presence. He tried to get an intelligent conversation going but the Klowns would have nothing of it.
One may download the work by Deborah Lipstadt. Free Download.
Obviously this work Chocolate is referring to is a rebuttal by Germar to the work by Untermensch habiru jΓΌdin Deborah Lipstadt.

The world currently faces β€œa perfect storm of antisemitism,” writer and Holocaust historian Deborah Lipstadt told some 250 people at Tufts on September 17. Habiru jΓΌdin Lipstadt continued to say "Antisemitism connects Jews with three key characteristics: money or financial power; the power to use those finances in β€œa nefarious, deleterious, malicious way”; and cunningβ€”intelligence used nefariously".

In this the Habiru jΓΌdin is most likely correct as it does have a good insight into its fellow Juden. It is one of the reasons why anti semitism is on the rise. Jude like it have overplayed their hand; people are seeing through their web of deceit. However, exposing Juden is not the topic of this thread.
Image
The book written by the Habiru is not a great seller by any stretch of the imagination, ranking very low even amongst the holocaust books so loved by those who inhabit the Klowns lounge. Germar says in his book:
The reason for the book’s importance is not so much its
contents but rather its political and historical impact. One of
the persons whose political background, motivations and
methods Lipstadt briefly mentions in the book is the British
historian David Irving. Lipstadt depicts him in her book as a
racist, anti-Semitic Holocaust denier. David Irving, who was
once considered the most successful historian of contemporary
history in the world due to having the most editions of his
works in circulation, didn’t like his reputation smeared by Dr.
Lipstadt, so he decided to sue her for defamation.
This is the first point, is Mr Irving what this habiru says. Mr Irving has changed his stance and claims he is not a "denier" which sadly has put him in the middle no mans land where Blake resides.
π•²π–Šπ–π–Šπ–Žπ–’π–Š π•Ύπ–™π–†π–†π–™π–˜π–•π–”π–‘π–Žπ–Ÿπ–Šπ–Ž π–‹π–šΜˆπ–— π–‰π–Šπ–“ π•Ύπ–Žπ–ˆπ–π–Šπ–—π–π–Šπ–Žπ–™π–˜π–‰π–Žπ–Šπ–“π–˜π–™

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 4916
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh. Swabia
Contact:

Bungled: auxiliary theories

Post by Huntinger » Sun Nov 10, 2019 5:51 pm

In Germars book he speaks of people creating auxiliary theories. This is where Occams razor comes in, where the simplest hypothesis or theory is probably the most likely one. In the case of the alleged holocaust we have either:
  1. 7 million growth in jΓΌdisch population in 40 years from the years 1900-1940, when for the next 40 years the growth is less than 2 million (1950-1990) or
  2. The Zionists in charge of collating and publishing those figures, who also declare war on the people affected by those figures faked them or misrepresented them in some other way.
It is so unlikely a is true the simplest explanation is of course b

Obviously some Jude went missing, in a war where 80 million perished. It is calculated 1.2 million Juden being a percentage of the dead population would have perished along with other races and religions. Using Occams razor again.
  1. Jude were murdered by gassing and bodies burned in miraculous times with methods unknown by science today
  2. Jude perished by disease due to war related conditions; these are loss of water, food, medicine, hygiene due to a break down of the infrastructure due to allied war efforts.
Once again the most likely answer and most simplest is b.

There is the issue of "where did they go", this is related to the above question but some were evicted.
  1. Juden were gassed in special extermination centres with magical methods of body disposal leaving no trace
  2. Evicted into Soviet Territory so that they became an issue for the Soviet Government.
The simplest and most likely is of course b. If one wishes to call eviction resettlement so be it.
π•²π–Šπ–π–Šπ–Žπ–’π–Š π•Ύπ–™π–†π–†π–™π–˜π–•π–”π–‘π–Žπ–Ÿπ–Šπ–Ž π–‹π–šΜˆπ–— π–‰π–Šπ–“ π•Ύπ–Žπ–ˆπ–π–Šπ–—π–π–Šπ–Žπ–™π–˜π–‰π–Žπ–Šπ–“π–˜π–™

rollo the ganger
Posts: 6207
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:34 am
Contact:

Re: Bungled: Germar Rudolf

Post by rollo the ganger » Mon Nov 11, 2019 11:05 am

The reason for the book’s importance is not so much its
contents but rather its political and historical impact. One of
the persons whose political background, motivations and
methods Lipstadt briefly mentions in the book is the British
historian David Irving. Lipstadt depicts him in her book as a
racist, anti-Semitic Holocaust denier. David Irving, who was
once considered the most successful historian of contemporary
history in the world due to having the most editions of his
works in circulation, didn’t like his reputation smeared by Dr.
Lipstadt, so he decided to sue her for defamation.
As I have stated before; why David Irving believed he could ever prevail in a British Court on this issue, no matter what evidence he presented, is beyond belief. Hindsight is always 20/20 but Irving should have challenged Lipstadt to publicly provide proof of her accusations and invited her to debate the matter. She would have, of course, declined and a victory would have been had for Irving.

As for Lipstadt, her prevailing in Court looked to her as an opportunity to advance her career, fame, fortune, and future prospects but it turned out she was a total flop. Her book was a flop. That thing called a "movie" was one of the biggest duds ever and the truth is; she is insignificant. If Irving had simply ignored her, Lipstadt would have been even less significant than she is now.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], MSN [Bot], Tai_Chi_Minh and 31 guests