been-there wrote: ↑
Fri Jun 14, 2019 3:38 pm
The people who were accused of witchcraft in Salem WERE
accused of flying on broomsticks, casting spells etc.
So again you have been arguing from a position of wilful ignorance.
I have no idea what the alleged witches at Salem were accused of doing. I am not claiming that they were or were not accused of flying brooms or spells or anything.
You don't believe they were witches presumably BECAUSE there is no physical evidence that people can fly on broomsticks, cast spells, etc. Right?
Not just no physical evidence, no evidence at all. If something did not happen, then there will be no evidence of it happening. Just like there is no evidence of mass daily departures from the AR camps or A-B kremas, which is evidence it did not happen.
So I am asking you to provide evidence of 'no witches in Salem'.
I am asking you to do that because you cannot do it. It is not possible to prove the absence of a thing like that. Just as no-one can prove there are no unicorns or fairies or leprechauns, etc.
Rubbish. Proving no unicorns, fairies etc is done by failing to find any evidence of their existence.
Just like denial cannot find any existence of the millions of people claimed not to have been gassed and who had to have been transported back out of the AR camps and A-B as those camps could not have accommodated millions of people between them.
We who don't believe in such things DO NOT HAVE TO provide evidence supporting our skepticism.Those who maintain such things are the ones who are required to prove they do exist.
This is basic logic.
It is the non sequitur fallacy, whereby deniers claim that because they do not believe the evidence for gassings, therefore no gassings took place.
E.g. In exactly the same way, asking those who doubt there are mass graves with tons of cremains and millions of human teeth in the ground at Treblinka are NOT the ones who are making a claim. That is a moronic misrepresentation.
The claim that there are no mass graves and tons of cremains, including teeth is for that claimant to evidence and prove.
A claim has been made that over 700,000 people were buried at Treblinka and then disinterred then cremated.
We who doubt that claim because of the lack of evidence for it, need not prove there is no evidence for it. It is the prerogative of those who are making the claim that there is, to just provide it.
If deniers just doubted the evidence then they would not go around making claims of no gassings and Holocaust.
If there was just doubt, then there would be a sceptical examination to find out what did happen instead of gassings. But deniers refuse to do that.
And the reality is that after seven years research at Treblinka, a University of Staffordshire archeological team appear to have failed to find that evidence. The reality is that they haven't produced it, anyway. They have produced evidence, but NOT any that proves the 'extermination of 700,0000' claim. They failed in their intended mission.
It was not the intended mission to prove gassings, mass graves and cremations purely through a physical examination of the camp. The Nazis did such a thorough cover up of the camp that they made proving what happened by physical evidence alone impossible. That in itself is evidence of criminal conduct, as criminals often try to cover up their crimes.
And further evidence of that is that Caroline Sturdy Colls pulled out of a lecture that was open to the public after she heard there were people who were going to turn up and question her about this lack of evidence.
Q1: Why would someone bottle out of that challenge IF
they had the physical evidence to support the T2 extermination camp claim?
You are a total dimwit and that is not an insult that I regard as a statement of proven fact of many years. In my view you should be banned from this forum because you add NOTHING to any discussion. You can't understand basic logic. You only create irritation and frustration with your obvious idiocy.
I do not know anything about C S-C pulling out of a lecture. You want me banned because you know my argument is correct and the burden of proof of no Holocaust is on deniers and that deniers cannot find any evidence to back up their claims. Instead, you are reversing the burden of proof. You claim TII was not a death camp and then demand others prove you wrong.