Code: Select all
It simply does not work except to allude to the link.
Huntinger wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2019 8:43 pmThe forum policy for url is that they should be enclosed in the code spaces. However, as you know, "You Tube" has taken down most if not all of the content relating to revisionism. One can see this at the bottom posting of the same video. Some of these same videos are found at "archive.org" movies which do play if the url is cut and simply pasted in. eg
If we were to use the
It simply does not work except to allude to the link.Anyway round this dilemma? without offending anyone.
Code: Select all
[url=https://archive.org/details/youtube-mwUJvq53SBo] [color=blue][b]Nancy Wake[/b][/color] [/url]
The above is from TWO years ago.Aryan Scholar wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2017 6:16 pmHow Nessie derails discussions:been-there wrote:Examples of tar-baby trolling / derailing:
This topic about Aktion Rheinhard is now cremation and mass graves.
This one has been derailed into discussing only cremated remains
This one is now also about cremains
This one currently being attempted into a Wannsee derailing
Etc., etc., etc.
- Nessie insert himself in the discussion with a straw man: "In accordance with the denialists, this mean..."
- he then adds a little lie after some responses: "Cremated remains has been found mixed in the ground by the CSC team..."
- Eventually his straw man and/or his little lies draw responses to correct him.
- Mission achieved, thread derailed, the discussion is now about his straw man and his little lies.
Turnagain wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 4:36 am
Off topic but I don't know where else to put this. Scott, would it be possible to post a poll for non-registered guests asking if they are pro-revisionists, pro-holocaust or undecided? I have no idea if it would be possible to prevent sock puppets from skewing the poll so a poll may not be a good idea. Some feedback on the debate would be interesting if possible though. Thanks.
The way to find out what the Holocaust is, is from the evidence, not arguing against the evidence.Scott wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2019 8:01 pm
Well, you have to define what is meant by "Holocaust" first. That puts the ball into the Believers' court, but they never like to do that. They want the Big-H to be whatever they say that it is, and whenever said─no more, no less.
That is why the Holocaust is basically a myth, a religion, a monolith, but one with feet of clay.
Real History, however, is not monolithic. It is very nuanced, and has many points of view.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 4 guests