Mattogno, Kues & Graf put it this way in their book "Extermination Camps" (The “Extermination Camps” of “Aktion Reinhardt”
An Analysis and Refutation of Factitious “Evidence,” Deceptions and Flawed Argumentation of the “Holocaust Controversies” Bloggers
Orthodox Holocaust historians face a dire dilemma: Either they choose not to respond to the revisionists, which is tantamount to unconditional surrender, or they try to refute them, thus initiating a debate which they are bound to lose.
It seems that orthodox holocaust historians are mortally afraid of debating the situation with a qualified revisionist.
Claims by such people as Roberto Muehlenkamp
who apparently believes that 703 persons, or more, can fit into an area of 25m2
were alive back then. Such claims were the order of the day at the trials. One should not bring up the soap, the shrunken heads, the lampshades, Jew Kababs and flammable blood, as I was told they were not responsible for the mass executions.
Likewise, the pedal powered head knocker had to be discounted along with the tree climbing as that was not responsible for enough "production line" executions.
an other wrote:
Flammable blood? Is that a killing method?
To the Nazis accused they were caught off guard with no adequate legal defense. Eichmann was probably laughing as he gasped his last breath and so were all the others. Probably fatty died laughing and so did Himmler;( hidden from the public as suicide as the cause of death was laughing?)