Open Thread for COMMENTS questions in new subforum

This board is open for all subject matters. Post information and discussion materials about open-debate and censorship on other boards (including this one) here. Memory Hole 2 is a RODOH subforum for alternate perspectives.
Post Reply
User avatar
Scott
Site Admin
Posts: 2238
Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 2:43 am
Location: USA, West of the Pecos
Contact:

Open Thread for COMMENTS questions in new subforum

Post by Scott » Mon Apr 11, 2016 7:02 pm

Post questions comments regarding the new RODOH subforum upstairs.

Formal Propositions in Holocaust History

:)

“Now we have forced Hitler to war so he no longer can peacefully annihilate one piece of the Treaty of Versailles after the other.”
~ Major General J.F.C. Fuller,
historian – England

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 26797
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Open Thread for COMMENTS questions in new subforum

Post by Nessie » Mon Apr 11, 2016 9:47 pm

Is it OK to post a topic that is being/has been covered elsewhere?
Can we see who has moderated a comment?
Will there be moderation of been-there?
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

User avatar
Scott
Site Admin
Posts: 2238
Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 2:43 am
Location: USA, West of the Pecos
Contact:

Re: Open Thread for COMMENTS questions in new subforum

Post by Scott » Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:05 pm

Some of the details are still being worked out but I don't think there is any limit on the topic type and whether it has been dealt with before elsewhere as long as it follows Been-There's rules. He will not simply approve it for posting until he is done working out the moderation details with the poster.

The new subforum has a very high bar of inclusion/exclusion, unlike the rest of the board. It is not a robust back-and-forth and no ad hominem is allowed.

This new sub-forum has been almost two years in the making from discussions with Been-There. Basically, the simpler, more focused and more concise the submission the better, otherwise the post should go into other parts of the forum with different standards or it may never see the light of day.

The rules and posting or moderation regarding any of the existing subforums have not been changed. Any comments or other discussion about the Formal Propositions subforum can go here.

:)

“Now we have forced Hitler to war so he no longer can peacefully annihilate one piece of the Treaty of Versailles after the other.”
~ Major General J.F.C. Fuller,
historian – England

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 26797
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Open Thread for COMMENTS questions in new subforum

Post by Nessie » Tue Apr 12, 2016 1:12 pm

Scott wrote:...as long as it follows Been-There's rules.......
:roll:
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

rollo the ganger
Posts: 6205
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:34 am
Contact:

Re: Open Thread for COMMENTS questions in new subforum

Post by rollo the ganger » Tue Apr 12, 2016 2:34 pm

Nessie wrote:Is it OK to post a topic that is being/has been covered elsewhere?
Can we see who has moderated a comment?
Will there be moderation of been-there?
GO FOR IT NESSIE!!!

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 26797
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Open Thread for COMMENTS questions in new subforum

Post by Nessie » Tue Apr 12, 2016 4:37 pm

Not until someone else has posted there to show what will be accepted and been-there can show he will be fair and even handed with his rules. Considering he has regularly hurled insults and relied heavily on logical fallacies to support his arguments, it does not bode well that he will be able to do that.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

User avatar
Scott
Site Admin
Posts: 2238
Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 2:43 am
Location: USA, West of the Pecos
Contact:

Re: Open Thread for COMMENTS questions in new subforum

Post by Scott » Tue Apr 12, 2016 8:19 pm

You don't have anything to lose by trying. Just keep it simple and concise and to the point and it should be fine when published in the new subforum.

This new "Propositions ..." subforum will be a nice collection of different ideas without ad hominems for a change.

:)

“Now we have forced Hitler to war so he no longer can peacefully annihilate one piece of the Treaty of Versailles after the other.”
~ Major General J.F.C. Fuller,
historian – England

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 26797
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Open Thread for COMMENTS questions in new subforum

Post by Nessie » Tue Apr 12, 2016 8:45 pm

A few words from our new moderator;

"More evidence that you are unintelligently trolling and this is yet another of your ill-informed, knee-jerk instinctive, stubbornly-ignorant replies. You KNOW nothing at all about the subject, do you?"

"You are again showing your hasbara tactic is to just deny all evidence that exposes the fallacies of your belief-system and that you do that without even understanding what it is you are attempting to refute."

"That is your own stubbornly stupid miscomprehension and argument from willful ignorance."

"I have not written any personal attack against you."

Do you think he will let posts be published where his arguments are described as unintelligent, trolling, ill-informed, knee-jerk, stubborn, ignorant, fallacious, ignorant etc? According to him such descriptives are acceptable and in in the rules since they are not a person attack.

You should just make Hannover a moderator and be done with it :roll:
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

User avatar
Scott
Site Admin
Posts: 2238
Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 2:43 am
Location: USA, West of the Pecos
Contact:

Re: Open Thread for COMMENTS questions in new subforum

Post by Scott » Tue Apr 12, 2016 9:00 pm

Just give it a chance. You are not debating him or with him in this case. And ideas are not confined to that subforum either. The rest of the board is not being changed.

:)

“Now we have forced Hitler to war so he no longer can peacefully annihilate one piece of the Treaty of Versailles after the other.”
~ Major General J.F.C. Fuller,
historian – England

User avatar
Charles Traynor
Posts: 2937
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 8:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Open Thread for COMMENTS questions in new subforum

Post by Charles Traynor » Tue Apr 12, 2016 9:41 pm

Grow up, Nessie. Your fear of honest debate within controlled guidelines is laid bare for all to see with this latest bout of whinging.
Kitty Hart-Moxon (1998): "Believe me, I came into Auschwitz in a much worse condition than I actually left it."

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests