The economic case that immigration is good for the economy;Werd wrote:Proof?
http://business.time.com/2013/01/30/the ... s-and-why/
http://www.oecd.org/migration/OECD%20Mi ... ro%202.pdf
Both studies agree immigration of skilled workers benefits the economy. This is not the unfettered immigration that Werd pictures which happened for a shirt period in parts of Europe. No one is saying let everyone and anyone in as Werd is trying to make out. The USA is the worlds best example of immigration boosting an economy. There has been wave after wave of immigrants and they are the only reason why the USA is the biggest economy. What Werd wants is white only immigration, that is because he is a racist.
Strawman, made up crap. Even the wealthiest economies have people in relative poverty. People have problems brought on by illness, mental health problems, addictions, fecklessness, lack of an education, criminality. They can be condemned to a life time of problems. Then others experience short term issues due to periods of unemployment and then get back on their feet again. Who do want to care for you in hospital? A trained, educated, skilled Syrian doctor or an untrained, uneducated, unskilled white American.Werd wrote:No whites are homeless/dead from starvation and lack of help/employment. Gotcha!
If I was Swedish I would want the government to act and temporarily stop all male Muslim immigration and deport any Muslim male even suspected of rape even if that means they go back to war torn Syria or Afghanistan. Sweden has gone too far in its welcoming and toleration and that has given Muslim males the impression they can do what they want. Not all Muslim males are rapists and to stop all immigration is going too far the other way.Werd wrote:Muslims know the law but don't care. Just like the white men who rape but not as much as muslims. How about we just don't let them in in the first place and deal with the white rape problem? Oh yeah because as dangerous as it is (you admit it), we still need them to take the place of a dying population. Brilliant!
Schengen has been in place since 1985. It has gradually expanded as the EU has expanded. It has had to be stopped because of a refugee crisis caused by the Arab spring and western action in Afghanistan and Iraq. Borders have closed at different times and rates and not all borders have been blocked off. That proves there is no one group in over all control of everything as there has been no consistency and open borders came long ago before the present crisis. Your abuse evidences how weak your argument is and how it needs propping up with fallacies.Werd wrote:Um, how'd they get in, in the first place then, jackass? The new world order elite families want a race war. They open up the country, AND THEN shut it. The fact that the opened it up in the first place proves me correct and shows you for the idiot you are.